Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
30
Nov
07

John Edwards’ Snark Attack

xedwards.jpgPresidential prettyboy John Edwards got a little snarky with Keith Olbermann about the controversy surrounding the use of Democratic “plants” during this week’s CNN/YouTube Republican debate. Dripping with sarcasm, Edwards said:

“Heaven forbid. How could we possibly survive if somebody who is antagonistic or has a different point of view than you do asks you a question? We can’t possibly expect somebody who answers questions from either independents or the other party to get elected President of the United States … This whole discussion is ridiculous.”

But Edwards himself led the charge in boycotting a Fox News Channel-sponsored debate for the Democratic hopefuls earlier this year, the (possibly accurate) implication being that Fox News was too biased to conduct itself properly. Et tu, CNN?

I’m increasingly believing that John Edwards should be seen and not heard.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

0 Responses to “John Edwards’ Snark Attack”


  1. No Comments

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




November 2007
S M T W T F S
    Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Pearce: Some people DO just naturally look stick thin.
    • Deathwina: Who the hell describes fried chicken as...
    • AllyKat: Jolly: I considered it, especially as his...
    • Judy T: Thats the slut calling the kettle cu-t. Why is...
    • Kelli: There’s a difference between being...
    • bubbasmom: Courage and Michael Vick? In the same...
    • Fortunate_Son: Sidebar: Happy 46th Birthday, Rielle...
    • JollyGreenMidget: Oh, and thanks Deceiver for not leaving...
    • JollyGreenMidget: Anyone going to make a crack about him...
    • Strabury: Dear Kirstie, STFU and get a sense of humor! It...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella