Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
03
Dec
07

Jennifer Love Hewitt Is a Size 2?

jennifer-love-hewitt-is-a-fatty.jpgJennifer Love Hewitt is engaged. And tromping around Hawaii on the one week this century when heterosexual males have something more exciting to think about than celebrity beach flesh. Good thing for them.

Now, it doesn’t bother me that Jenna the Hutt has enough junk for a Pottery Barn full of trunks. But what drives me batty is the holier-than-thou female empowerment message she posted on her Myspace page after a half-dozen blogs snarked about how she was suddenly larger than life:

“I’ve sat by in silence for a long time now about the way women’s bodies are constantly scrutinized. To set the record straight, I’m not upset for me, but for all of the girls out there that are struggling with their body image.

A size 2 is not fat! Nor will it ever be. And being a size 0 doesn’t make you beautiful

To all girls with butts, boobs, hips and a waist, put on a bikini – put it on and stay strong.”

Maybe — just maybe — she was a size 2 on Party of Five. But now she’s looking more like Party of Ten.

It makes me wonder what kind of Photoshop voodoo was harnessed by Hanes in 2005 to turn out this ad. There’s nothing wrong with growing into your body, Jen. Just be honest about it.

Photo: Splash News

Bad Boys and GirlsAnimal FilesHypolitics 2008

18 Responses to “Jennifer Love Hewitt Is a Size 2?”


  1. 1 Psychotic Ape Dec 6th, 2007 at 12:48 am

    Say what you will but she’s still hot!

  2. 2 justin Dec 6th, 2007 at 9:07 am

    Personally,a woman with a little meat on her is sexy!

  3. 3 Ruby Dec 6th, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    The problem isn’t so much that she has a “little meat on her”. The problem is that she is claiming to be a size 2. She’s right…size 2 isn’t fat but she’s no size 2.

  4. 4 l Dec 7th, 2007 at 1:01 pm

    Where is she claiming to be a size 2? The article clearly and calmly addresses the problem of body image in general. She absolutely is not saying, “I’m a size 2, step off!” She’s saying, Hollywood standards are jacked up, size two isn’t fat.

    See, when you read something AND pay attention at the same time, you actually understand what the author is trying to say! Pretty cool, right?

  5. 5 Stan Hooper Dec 8th, 2007 at 12:08 pm

    Wow. What a difference two years makes. She was HOT in those Hanes ads. Jenny Love has let herself go a bit. Not that there is anything wrong with that. But she’s an actress, and a highly paid one on TV, so she’s has the best resources to hire a trainer to keep her asset, which is her body, in top shape. For her to tell women to love their curves, is all good, but if she’s in denial of her own body and can’t put it behind her, she’s been doing that for some time now, and look how chunky its become.

  6. 6 Seraphina Dec 8th, 2007 at 5:37 pm

    Maybe American sizes are bigger than European, because there’s NO WAY that’s a size 2. I’m a size 4 and my ass is half the size of that. - If she’s going to be so righteous, why not go all the way and tell people the truth about her clothing size? - Unless of course she’s 4 feet tall, then it just might be true.

  7. 7 Poopsie Dec 9th, 2007 at 11:38 am

    You cannot tell how big or small someone is from a photo.

    She does look fleshy in this picture, but you can’t tell really how much flesh is there because there’s no frame of reference.

    I know actresses in the u.s. are looked at as having to have model perfect bodies, but they’re not models.

    They use their bodies to act.

    She is not very tall and it is totally a bad angle, too.

  8. 8 BinkyM Dec 11th, 2007 at 8:32 pm

    @Stan Hooper: Her problem appears to be that she DID put it all behind her! She sits on it! @Poopsie: In other photos taken the same day on the beach with her fiancee, you can see she’s a LOT bigger than he is. She used to be sylph-like, with no cottage cheese in sight. But even without someone else in the photo, this is pretty bad. She might be able to get one of her arms into the leg of my size 2 jeans. It’s a shame; her Hanes ads were *gorgeous*.

  9. 9 Anonymous Dec 12th, 2007 at 12:42 am

    people are trippin, nobody has any right to follow somebody and snapp pictures of there body while there on vaction! i think she is beautiful and nobody has anything on her, they just wish they were her! all girls have there problems .

  10. 10 Size 10 Dec 14th, 2007 at 5:00 am

    to be perfectly honest I was a size twelve and looked smaller than that and thats the honest truth..my daughter is a size 0 to 1 and she is way smaller than that. I don’t think she’s fat at all but just not a size 2 and I did read her reply and it does seem to imply that she’s a size 2…why would she reference that particular size if she didn’t mean herself? Just doesn’t make sense.

  11. 11 Omnivorous Dec 22nd, 2007 at 1:03 pm

    Like my mom said, we can believe she’s size two because of one word.

    Lycra.

  12. 12 eww Jan 18th, 2008 at 6:38 pm

    She is beautiful. Even if she isnt 100 pounds. People are so friggin rude. If you are so worried about weight, then go criticise your own bodies,not someone who is perfect happy with theirs!. Feminist pigs!

  13. 13 Brenna Jan 20th, 2008 at 11:07 pm

    I have no idea what size she is, but the more expensive the clothes, the smaller the size you will be. Maybe she has been in Hollywood too long and doesn’t know what a real size 2 looks like? And, I don’t think she is fat by any means.

  14. 14 Shandey Jan 23rd, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    It’s REALLY hard to tell what size someone is by looking at them, even when you do have a point of reference. It’s all about proportion, and clothes are cut in many different ways to accommodate for different body types. I’d guess the manufacturers label these different cuts according to whichever dimension gives them the smallest size. A standard US size 2 is usually around a 24 inch waist and a 35 inch hip. I can easily believe JLH has a 24″ waist. Her hips are likely bigger than 35″, but since she’d be wearing clothes cut with some give in the hips, she really could buy most of her clothes in a size 2.

  15. 15 Pat Riot Jan 26th, 2008 at 10:17 pm

    all i can say is….she’s a damn fine figure of a woman….a figure 8…size 8…and she’s way ok for me…so, if that fiance’ decides not to follow through i’ll….still be trying to find this picture of her backside on the web…

  16. 16 Frazzled Feb 18th, 2008 at 3:48 pm

    Did she say a size 2 in WHAT ??? lol
    Maybe it was NOT pants ? There is a good chance that she meant something else?
    That wouldn’t make her a liar then right?

    Oh well, who knows for sure.
    Maybe she meant pants, maybe she was remembering what it was like to be a 2 pant size, or maybe it WAS SOMETHING else.

  17. 17 Sanne Feb 27th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    I can’t believe this! Why is everyone making a fuss about it. She’s a beautiful girl, this is a really bad angle! Even if she ain’t a size 2, she ain’t fat. And she definitely ain’t a size 12! How many of you have a picture of yourself from the back, in bikini? I don’t think that makes you look any thinner. And you don’t know the way she looks from the front now. You can’t even be sure it’s her!

  18. 18 Brooke Aug 18th, 2008 at 11:53 pm

    AHAHAHA cow. Okay, no, I’m not beatin’ up on her because she’s gained weight. I always thought she was too skinny before and, well, not hot to begin with. But who does she think she’s fooling? Size 2 isn’t fat…. damn straight it’s not. But your caboose needs a bigger station than what you’re talking about! She probably thought everyone would read that and go “Oh, she’s a size 2? Oh, okay, then I guess she’s not that much heavier.” I’m a size four, and I assure you what cheese there might be on the inner backs of my thighs cannot compare to what she’s flashin’. I wonder if she can clap that thaaang.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




December 2007
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella