Your Ad Here
Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
18
Jan
08

Dr. Phil May Be Off the Hook

drphil_3.jpgBoo. Because Dr. Phil McGraw didn’t charge Britney or her parents for his unsolicited professional opinion, he’s probably not going to be disciplined for “treating” her without a license or blabbing about her condition to the media.

A complaint has reportedly been brought against him to the California Board of Psychology, and they are required to investigate the claim.

However, according to state regulations, Dr. Phil would have violated California law only if he had been paid for his services. And it didn’t sound like the Spears were too happy about the visit, so it’s unlikely they paid him for it.

In a taping of his show that will air Monday, he said his visit was appropriate and that his only regret was talking about the visit:

“Was it helpful to the situation? Regrettably, no. It was not, and I have to acknowledge that and I do … I definitely think if I had it to do over again, I probably wouldn’t make any statement at all. Period.”

Too little, too late.

The PeTA FilesGreen PhoniesLove, American Style

2 Responses to “Dr. Phil May Be Off the Hook”


  1. 1 scientolopastogistafarian Apr 30th, 2008 at 4:09 am

    “I definitely think if I had it to do over again, I probably wouldn’t make any statement at all. Period.”

    i DEFINITELY
    THINK
    i PROBABLY wouldn’t
    PERIOD

    Gosh, Dr. Phil, could you possibly sound any less definite than that?

  1. 1 Late Night Links… | Celebrity Fashion Watcher Pingback on Jan 18th, 2008 at 10:39 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




January 2008
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella