If you don’t feel like listening to Mike Huckabee drone on for that whole clip, you can fast-forward to about 3:50. He’s talking about how, unlike the Bible, the U.S. Constitution was designed to be amended. Here’s what he says:
My point was that the Constitution was a document, it’s a living, breathing document written in order that it could be changed. The Scriptures, however, were not written so that we would change them to adapt them to ever-changing cultural norms.
This is why he’s against gay marriage, apparently. But wait, what does he say on his site about judges trying to legislate from the bench?
I firmly believe that the Constitution must be interpreted according to its original meaning, and flatly reject the notion of a “living Constitution.” The meaning of the Constitution cannot be changed by judicial fiat.
Which is it? Either it’s a living, breathing document or it isn’t. Unless it’s some sort of… zombie Constitution? That would be pretty cool. I actually might have stayed awake in class if the Constitution were trying to eat people’s brains.
(Hat Tip: Hot Air)





