Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
23
Jan
08

V for Vacuous

demi_moore.jpgDemi Moore posed (almost) nude for V magazine’s upcoming issue, and with it gave an interview that’s about as real as her face.

A couple of noteworthy moments:

But mother-of-three Demi protests that on this occasion stripping off wasn’t her idea.

The Charlie’s Angels star posed in the bathing suit for V magazine, but she insists she was persuaded to strip off by the late Princess Diana’s favourite photographer Mario Testino.

Demi said she was against being pictured in a bathing suit but the charismatic photographer wore her down until she agreed to remove her clothes.

She said: “Mario’s idea was all swimming suits and I got him down to just one.”

Right, because she’s always been so modest.

Demi spent a vast sum [rumored to be close to $400,000] on head-to-toe surgery four years ago, including a procedure on her sagging knees.

Despite her youthful looks, she has complained that there are not enough Hollywood parts for older women.

She is 45 years old! Hollywood isn’t going to cast her to play a 20-something ingenue because she couldn’t pull it off, and they’re not going to have her play someone’s mother because what other mom of three looks like she does? What she’s really complaining about is that there aren’t enough starring roles for cosmetically altered drones.

Bad Boys and GirlsAnimal FilesHypolitics 2008

2 Responses to “V for Vacuous”


  1. 1 C. Jan 24th, 2008 at 11:01 am

    She’s kind of right that there’s not enough roles for older women, but she’s also kind of wrong that she’s not getting hired because she’s older. She’s getting older because her face can’t convey emotion any more and she can’t pull off either age spectrum. But there are a lack of good roles for older women - look at Diane Keaton. It’s sad.

  2. 2 Pastafarian Jan 24th, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Man she’s smokin’ though. Most mother’s of ONE don’t look like her.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




January 2008
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella