Nobody can accuse Hillary Clinton of going out without a fight. Even as pundit after pundit declares her candidacy DOA, she’s still hanging onto the hem of Obama’s garment with all her claws:
Senator Clinton’s campaign is charging Senator Obama with hypocrisy for denouncing independently funded advertising campaigns which supported his opponents in Iowa but saying little about similar efforts being mounted now on his behalf in Ohio.
However, Mrs. Clinton’s own position on the appropriate role for so-called 527 organizations is murky, a fact which complicates her attempt to tarnish Mr. Obama concerning the issue.
“In Iowa, he criticized this kind of spending but in Ohio he is largely silent,” a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Howard Wolfson, said. “Senator Obama has a pattern of making promises, making statements that are not backed up by his actions… That is not change you can believe in.”
How much money has Hillary spent on her campaign? Can’t she hire somebody who’ll do more than take whatever Obama’s saying and snottily reverse it? Have they tried “No He Can’t” yet? That’d wow ‘em. How about, “You can’t spell ‘Mama’s boy’ without ‘Obama’”? Nah, that one would probably get her in more trouble than she’s in already.
She could be right and he’s a big hypocrite, but I’m not sure I could stay awake long enough to look into it. He’s prettier and newer than she is, and doesn’t have a voice that makes you want to poke out your own eardrums with knitting needles, and it looks like that’s enough. Plus he’s better at the “How Dare You” game than she is. Oh, and also, she’s Hillary Clinton.
If she wanted to be mean…
http://www.leconcombre.com/concpost/fr/postcard4/alfred_e_neuman.jpg
Just add a little color. You needn’t worry about the ears.
By the way when he was running for senate here a few years ago, I kept seeing signs in people’s windows, especially in Chicago that I thought supported Osama. It was at a glance and not long after 9/11. I know it was just a trick of the eye but seemed really bad at the time.