Your Ad Here
Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
27
Feb
08

V for Very Inconsistent

natalie_portman2.jpgOh readers, how we adore you.

The eagle-eyed Genevieve tipped us off to this part of that recent interview with Natalie Portman when she talked about her vegan shoes:

[S]he has the reputation for being the most elegant of young actresses, and, yes, she has a jade cashmere sweater, skinny blue jeans, a check coat that ties smartly at her tiny waist. But she’s also wearing big, green, deeply inelegant wellies, because she has found the cheaper a shoe is, the more likely it is to be vegan. Hence her launch of a shoe line for Te Casan, with all profits going to the Nature Conservancy.

Cashmere is the wool that comes from cashmere goats and is known for its luxurious feel and high cost — but it’s a decidedly nonvegan source of clothing fibers. You’d think a Harvard grad would know this.

The PeTA FilesGreen PhoniesLove, American Style

11 Responses to “V for Very Inconsistent”


  1. 1 Lady AC Feb 27th, 2008 at 1:31 pm

    I’m pretty sure that “Vegan Studies” are not included in the general education schedule of Harvard or any other university for that matter. Being a “Harvard grad” has nothing to do with one’s aptitude to discriminating what is vegan and what is not.

  2. 2 Pastafarian Feb 27th, 2008 at 2:09 pm

    I didn’t go to Harvard here’s how you discriminate between what is vegan and what is not. Ready? Vegans don’t use anything that comes from animals. Normal people do. There I just saved you $200,000 in tuitions.

  3. 3 Simon Scowl Feb 27th, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    Lady AC is right: being a Harvard grad doesn’t necessarily make you smart or informed.

  4. 4 SillyBilly Feb 28th, 2008 at 4:09 am

    Granted it may not be vegan, but cashmere doesn’t harm the animal it comes from - it’s like any wool, it is shaved and grows back. So it’s not exactly the same as wearing fur or leather, is it?

  5. 5 matt Feb 28th, 2008 at 4:34 am

    I don’t get the hypocrisy here… So she wears non-vegan clothing - so what?
    Did she ever say she only wears vegan clothing or something?

  6. 6 The Oversneer Feb 28th, 2008 at 9:35 am

    SillyBilly — Congratulations. You’ve just articulated a great argument for why self-professed vegans should make an exception for milk and eggs. Good luck trying to convince PETA.

  7. 7 Holly Won't Feb 28th, 2008 at 12:29 pm

    SillyBilly and Matt, part of veganism is not wearing clothing that comes from animals, including wool and silk. So as a vegan, she’s not playing by the rules, but she’s trying to make money off of those who do by selling her vegan shoes.

  8. 8 matt Feb 29th, 2008 at 3:31 am

    But I thought Natalie Portman wasn’t a vegan?

    http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/11/27/natalie-portman-has-no-plans-to-go-vegan/

    So I still don’t see the hypocrisy… If I were to write a vegetarian cook book, while not being a vegetarian myself (say I occasionally eat fish), would that make me a hypocrite, because I’m making money of those who ARE vegetarians? I don’t think it would - unless I claimed to be a vegetarian anyway, or said I’d never eat fish. IMHO.

  9. 9 Holly Won't Feb 29th, 2008 at 8:42 am

    I saw the Ecorazzi post too, but Goveg.com, Happycow.net, and Vegansociety.com all list her on their celebrity vegan pages. So it seems sometimes she is and sometimes she isn’t.

  10. 10 matt Feb 29th, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    OK, fair enough. :)

  11. 11 Errin Mar 25th, 2008 at 9:38 am

    Hey, just because the interviewer noted that he/she THOUGHT the sweater was cashmere does not make it so. There are a lot of synthetic sweaters out there made to look like and feel like cashmere, just like there is synthetic silk for shirts and synthetic leather for shoes. I think this is really a case of the reporter getting it wrong. Natalie Portman seems to be very careful about her diet and her wardrobe, so I think we should look at this as reporter error and not her conscious choice to wear cashmere.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




February 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829  
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella