29
Mar
08

Black Is the New Green Is the New Dumb

The official Google blog, 8/9/07:

Reducing climate change by saving energy is an important effort we should all join, and that’s why we’re very glad to see the innovative thinking going into a variety of solutions. One idea, suggested by the site called “Blackle” (which is not related to Google, by the way, though the site does use our custom search engine), is to reduce energy used by monitors by providing search with a black background. We applaud the spirit of the idea, but our own analysis as well as that of others shows that making the Google homepage black will not reduce energy consumption. To the contrary, on flat-panel monitors (already estimated to be 75% of the market), displaying black may actually increase energy usage. Detailed results from a new study confirm this.

Google today:

They know it’s an empty gesture, but they’re doing it anyway. Happy Earth Hour, suckers!

(Hat tip: Valleywag)

P.S. According to Harper’s Magazine, Google is an “energy glutton.” Check out the blueprint of their server farm in The Dalles, Oregon, home of “some of the cheapest electricity in North America.” It’s powered not by magic pixie dust (my longtime theory), but by the Columbia River. Every time you search Google Images for pre-pregnancy Britney pics, God kills a kitten and Google kills a salmon.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:


11 Responses to “Black Is the New Green Is the New Dumb”


  1. 1 ss Mar 29th, 2008 at 9:36 am

    I love Google and everything about it. Yay Google!

  2. 2 Pastafarian Mar 29th, 2008 at 11:42 am

    The people that promote this kind of ridiculousness don’t want to change the way THEY live. They just want you to change the way YOU live. Anyone that thinks humans waste too much energy are free to move to a cave in Idaho and become hunter-gatherers any time they like. Yet they never, ever do. Why? There’s no one to lecture in those types of places.

  3. 3 AndrewGurn Mar 29th, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    Maybe they should have shut down their servers instead.

    Or not, because it would be much harder for me to fulfill my daily animated japanese tentacle intercourse needs. Thank you for not -really- caring, Google. This next fap is for you.

  4. 4 Rocko Mar 30th, 2008 at 1:31 pm

    Really? Black uses more energy? I’m going to go get some darker wallpapers and screen savers.

    Killing the Earth one processor cycle at a time,
    Rocko

  5. 5 Judi Mar 31st, 2008 at 10:38 am

    My father called me from a random hotel on Saturday and wanted to know why the f*ck Google’s screen was black.

    I pointed him in your direction…Deceiver.com is our newest obsession.

  6. 6 Lurker Mar 31st, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    Umm yeah..powered by the Columbia River. Those damn, dirty non-polluting, renewable energy guzzlers!

    [Not a big fan of salmon, eh? -- Mgmt.]

  7. 7 Simon Scowl Mar 31st, 2008 at 3:29 pm

    Umm… non-polluting? Click here.

  8. 8 Pastafarian Apr 1st, 2008 at 5:33 pm

    Facts mean nothing Mr. Scowl. Not when so many have so much tied up emotionally.

  1. 1 Lights out for Google | Theodore Campbell Pingback on Mar 29th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
  2. 2 Locomotive Breath 1901 Trackback on Mar 31st, 2008 at 8:21 am
  3. 3 It’s Been a While Since We Pointed Out That Google Is Full of Crap at Deceiver.com Pingback on Jan 13th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!



Report a hypocrite* at
tips@deceiver.com



* Famous people only. We don't care about your two-timing ex, nosy neighbor, or belligerent boss.


Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Clownfish: Interesting article on Julian Assange’s...
    • James Woods: How does $379,000 match $500,000?...
    • James Woods: I can’t even understand what he was...
    • James Woods: This ties into local governments demanding...
    • James Woods: Peta and the pornstar aren’t worthy of...
    • sex: very muscular body, I really liked having a...
    • Drastic: When does “editorial oversight” end...
    • RNB: ‘Shield.’ S-H-I-E-L-D....
    • Jenn: Heh heh Vince… good one.
    • Vince: Is there an echo in here?
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • “I also really appreciate reading the comments left by Deceiver regulars. I rarely comment myself, but I'm a daily reader. Sometimes I feel like this is the only ‘place’ in the world where people make any sense at all.”

      – reader fallingstar
    • “The running list of PETA faux pas is so long, I've had friends tell me they are funded by special interest groups interested in making vegetarians look ridiculous (I'm not kidding). Read Deceiver.com's hilarious dissection of PETA's latest officious blunder.”

      – blogger Mark Sisson
    • “Look, you have a point deceiver… but you do it in the most douchebaggy way possible.”

    • “I just want to say thanks to the writing staff of both the articles and comments here. You guys keep my sides sore and have collective wit that has more bite than a chinese buffet. The humor delivered at the expense of those who deserve it is almost too much to handle at once. This site cannot possibly be real.”

      – reader quigonkick
    • “If you want to get up to speed on the [John Edwards] accusations and see the supporting materials, the best place I've seen everything laid out so far is on the gossipy blog Deceiver.com. I wish it were Talking Points Memo or Raw Story but nope; Deceiver is all over it.”

      – blogger Lee Stranahan