Your Ad Here
Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
14
Apr
08

Cartoon of the Week

Granted, there’s nobody terribly famous in the picture … but I figure it’s just a matter of time before Susan Sarandon,  Richard Gere, Danny Glover, and Tim Robbins start kvetching.

china-olypmic-hypocrite-cartoon.jpg

The PeTA FilesGreen PhoniesLove, American Style

11 Responses to “Cartoon of the Week”


  1. 1 db Apr 14th, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    We live in Wal-Mart world and China is its demigod. Certainly $2 pairs of shoes seem like a great buy but they are made from the cheapest resources and cheapest inputs which is synonymous with least humane and environmentally conscious. This is the cycle of consumption in its purest form as people see a great “buy” but you are going to have to buy 10 of the cheap shit ones to last as long as buying 1 good one for a little bit more money. My biggest beef with China are their protectionist trade practices, no such thing as free trade people .. its called taxpayers subsidizing America’s inefficiencies. Now fade-out situation of family with 10 kids and fade-in China taking over the world.

  2. 2 Pastafarian Apr 14th, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    YEAH! Screw Wal-Mart! How dare they sell stuff I can afford, and become successful doing it!! Where were all of these asinine arguments when Sears was the “Worlds Largest Store”?

    If you don’t like Wal-Mart, don’t shop there. It’s easy.

    Actually I’ve only been in Wal-Mart once.

  3. 3 db Apr 14th, 2008 at 5:06 pm

    Pastafarian missed my point completely and is defending a store which he doesn’t even shop at .. this the mindless consumerism I am tryng to fight. Wal-Mart opens a new giant store EACH DAY, can you even understand what that means? Not only do they open their store they always buy up all the immediate area land and make all kinds of use restrictions for any product that might compete with them. This makes it difficult to sell the land but the world is full of Pastafarian’s who will overpay for it. And yes, I, myself, never shop there but the population will and they do not realize they are lining our future enemy’s pockets. The Eagle will join with the Sickle to fight the Dragon in 2012, understand? I thought not.

  4. 4 Simon Scowl Apr 14th, 2008 at 5:37 pm

    Wal-Mart opens a new giant store EACH DAY, can you even understand what that means?

    365 stores a year?

  5. 5 isabella gucci Apr 14th, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    I’d rather celebs speak up about things like this rather than stay quiet and not use their star power to bring attention to these issues.

  6. 6 Rocko Apr 14th, 2008 at 10:13 pm

    Yes. Bring their star power to free Tibet. So I’m sure the Chinese government will have an emergency cabinet meeting because “Hollywood is mad at them!” And presto a free Tibet! Everything will be solved. Just like Hollywood star power solved … mmm …

    What stars should do is say something about things they can do something about, like go help build a house, start a scholarship fund, refuse to do horrible movies no matter how much they pay, encourage us to adopt pets from shelters and get our them spayed or neutered. Hollywood stars and starlets aren’t going to affect a change in international politics unless they are sleeping with one of these power brokers. And in that case, they’d only be effective if the ’suicide’ can’t be properly sold.

    As for WalMart, people don’t like premium prices. They like ‘Everyday low prices.’ Look at all these fast food places with Dollar menus and value meals. Remember those ‘Made in the USA’ ads from the 90s? If you don’t my point is made, if you do, the people that don’t still make my point. Consumerism isn’t going to kill America, ignorance is. Your 2012 conspiracy sentence is all I need to realize you’re one of the ignorant lot.

    Call me Thomas Paine ’cause putting down so much common sense,
    Rocko

  7. 7 JustPoor Apr 14th, 2008 at 10:23 pm

    I happen to shop at Wal-Mart. I’m guessing I’m about what the average American is. I have a college degree, I’ve been working post-grad for the last 11 yrs. and never had a job that afforded me an income of more than $37,000 a yr. and that’s a lucky day for me to earn that much.
    I’ve been through worse times. I happen to be one of those unfortunate American’s that actually BEEN HUNGRY

  8. 8 JustPoor Apr 14th, 2008 at 10:29 pm

    Does anyone that reads this site actually know what that means? To be Hungry In America? And you blame me for “splurging” on a new bra every 6 months, from Wal-Mart at $5.99? I actually bought some new underwear a few months ago too! Gosh, that was a happy day too. No more elastic pulling up on one side, as cotton falls down the cheek, and worrying that my coworkers might be able to see the pinching and pulling or crack-riding panties through my clothes.
    New, clean, underwear! What a joyous day in America for a LOSER LIKE ME. What have I done to be ridiculed by ppl here? I paid my dues, I went through college, I graduated in the top 1/4 of my college class, and I have been Hungry in America. Where is my American dream?

  9. 9 Pastafarian Apr 15th, 2008 at 9:57 am

    I didn’t miss your point db. Your just wrong thats all.

    I just wonder how some people would feel, if it was say a Whole Foods moving into a neighborhood and driving a small “mom and pop” organic store out of business.

    http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/82-hating-corporations/

  10. 10 db Apr 15th, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    Each of us has a valid argument and its not your fault the u.s. gov’t has mandated “free trade”. The point here is that CHINA is wrecking the planet at a rate far worse than the rest of the world and they still get “developing nation status” to jusitfy the unbridled growth of that nation without any specific protocols for the environment or banking for that matter. The irony is that we are essentially addicted to China which supports our cycle of cheap, (perceivably) perfect, now consumption. There is no argument against hunger but their is an argument for quality, diversity, and choice for hard goods and textiles.

  1. 1 Cartoon of the Day: Screaming Contradiction « Red Telephone Pingback on Apr 14th, 2008 at 2:06 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




April 2008
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella