<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The House of Mouse Shows Another Child Unbloused</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/</link>
	<description>The two-faced and famous have something new to worry about.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geas</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>Geas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>Why would Disney care if an underage model poses, when the underwear is made by child slave labor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Disney care if an underage model poses, when the underwear is made by child slave labor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reayx5</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>reayx5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 06:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2992</guid>
		<description>Ah, I don't know. The Sunday newspaper ads for Sears, Kohls, etc., have photos like the Chinese Disney billboard. Sure, I can only look at them once, because then the pages are stuck together. Damn, I've got another cramp in my hand! I'll finish this later...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I don&#8217;t know. The Sunday newspaper ads for Sears, Kohls, etc., have photos like the Chinese Disney billboard. Sure, I can only look at them once, because then the pages are stuck together. Damn, I&#8217;ve got another cramp in my hand! I&#8217;ll finish this later&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocko</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2985</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2985</guid>
		<description>When a company goes to China it's like going to Las Vegas and I'm sure these companies wish what happened in China stayed in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a company goes to China it&#8217;s like going to Las Vegas and I&#8217;m sure these companies wish what happened in China stayed in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2966</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2966</guid>
		<description>I could honestly give two s***s and a f*** about what Miley Montana is doing.  I didn't see the big deal behind the pictures, but I also don't give a s*** who is for or against her decision.

Honestly, I felt more creeped out by the picture with her father.  I love my father, and I will always be a Daddy's girl - butt that one just sent chills down my spine.  Yuck.

Either way, I will not start watching Hannah Montana, I will not start giving a f*** what this little brat is doing, and if THIS was such a big deal and she apologized about it right away (which seems really f'n fishy to me, anyone else?) where were the apologies about the pictures of her in her bra?  It just makes no sense to me whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could honestly give two s***s and a f*** about what Miley Montana is doing.  I didn&#8217;t see the big deal behind the pictures, but I also don&#8217;t give a s*** who is for or against her decision.</p>
<p>Honestly, I felt more creeped out by the picture with her father.  I love my father, and I will always be a Daddy&#8217;s girl - butt that one just sent chills down my spine.  Yuck.</p>
<p>Either way, I will not start watching Hannah Montana, I will not start giving a f*** what this little brat is doing, and if THIS was such a big deal and she apologized about it right away (which seems really f&#8217;n fishy to me, anyone else?) where were the apologies about the pictures of her in her bra?  It just makes no sense to me whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastafarian</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastafarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>I remember something about Annette. I thought I heard they found pieces of her contracts in the K-T Boundary. You know. Cuz she's old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember something about Annette. I thought I heard they found pieces of her contracts in the K-T Boundary. You know. Cuz she&#8217;s old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronic Malanga</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Chronic Malanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2963</guid>
		<description>So it's ok to exploit little Chinese kids. ;) 

You mentioned the very example that came to mind Capcom when you mentioned Annette. She was actually not even allowed to appear in those movies wearing a bikini. A navel would have been scandalous. While I feel that those sorts of restrictions are a bit over the top, especially when we're talking about the 60's, it might be sensible in the modern day simply because the trouble these Disney girls get into so publically now go far beyond a bellybutton. I don't even feel Miley has done anything wrong. If anything, they should be more worried about the other pics of her floating around the 'net, not this. However, the Spears sisters and Lindsay have covered pretty much everything from rehab to teenage pregnancy at this point. 

But yeah, Disney wants any publicity, not just the good publicity. Scandal makes money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s ok to exploit little Chinese kids. <img src='http://deceiver.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You mentioned the very example that came to mind Capcom when you mentioned Annette. She was actually not even allowed to appear in those movies wearing a bikini. A navel would have been scandalous. While I feel that those sorts of restrictions are a bit over the top, especially when we&#8217;re talking about the 60&#8217;s, it might be sensible in the modern day simply because the trouble these Disney girls get into so publically now go far beyond a bellybutton. I don&#8217;t even feel Miley has done anything wrong. If anything, they should be more worried about the other pics of her floating around the &#8216;net, not this. However, the Spears sisters and Lindsay have covered pretty much everything from rehab to teenage pregnancy at this point. </p>
<p>But yeah, Disney wants any publicity, not just the good publicity. Scandal makes money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capcom</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2961</link>
		<dc:creator>Capcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2961</guid>
		<description>So true Chronic, about the old contracts. And we all remember Annette and her covered navel in the beach-blanket movies. The telling moment in Disney's reply, is that they knew about the "oversight" (that their huge advert dept conceived of and approved) months ago, but are only now pulling it because it was noticed outside of China. OK.

BTW, this is a great site. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true Chronic, about the old contracts. And we all remember Annette and her covered navel in the beach-blanket movies. The telling moment in Disney&#8217;s reply, is that they knew about the &#8220;oversight&#8221; (that their huge advert dept conceived of and approved) months ago, but are only now pulling it because it was noticed outside of China. OK.</p>
<p>BTW, this is a great site. <img src='http://deceiver.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastafarian</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2950</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastafarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2950</guid>
		<description>No, you're not the only one who doesn't care what Miley Cyrus did or did not wear in some magazine. In fact I don't care about Miley Cyrus at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you&#8217;re not the only one who doesn&#8217;t care what Miley Cyrus did or did not wear in some magazine. In fact I don&#8217;t care about Miley Cyrus at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronic Malanga</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2948</link>
		<dc:creator>Chronic Malanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/2008/04/30/the-house-of-mouse-shows-another-child-unbloused/#comment-2948</guid>
		<description>Why do they let it happen in the first place? Publicity. The more publicity generated, good or bad, the more money they make. You have to wonder if there is something in a Disney slave's contract that prevents them from this sort of thing. I doubt that there is, because when there is a whoooopsie, they are thrust into the spotlight, which is where they want to be. 

When actors in the Golden Age were all under contract to a studio, those contracts outlined exactly what sort of image they were meant to project and would cover up any "wrongdoing" at whatever cost. If Disney were serious about protecting their little money makers, they would do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they let it happen in the first place? Publicity. The more publicity generated, good or bad, the more money they make. You have to wonder if there is something in a Disney slave&#8217;s contract that prevents them from this sort of thing. I doubt that there is, because when there is a whoooopsie, they are thrust into the spotlight, which is where they want to be. </p>
<p>When actors in the Golden Age were all under contract to a studio, those contracts outlined exactly what sort of image they were meant to project and would cover up any &#8220;wrongdoing&#8221; at whatever cost. If Disney were serious about protecting their little money makers, they would do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
