Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
10
Jun
08

Wal-Mart Teams Up With AC/DC for New Album

acdc.jpgEveryone knows about Wal-Mart’s longstanding refusal to carry albums they consider not to be family-friendly.

Victims of the policy include John Cougar Mellencamp, who had to edit out a devil on an album cover; Nirvana, which was forced to change the name of the song “Rape Me” to “Waif Me” (I know, what?); and Sheryl Crow, whose album was summarily banned from the store’s shelves because of the song “Love Is A Good Thing,” in which she sang “watch our children as they kill each other/with a gun they bought at Wal-Mart discount stores.”

But because the nation’s biggest retailer accounts for more than 10 percent of CD sales in the country, most musicians are willing to release a sanitized version to be sold there.

So it comes as a bit of a surprise that the store has signed veteran rockers AC/DC to an exclusive agreement for their upcoming album.

Obviously this can’t be the long-awaited greatest hits compilation. Otherwise we could look forward to such anthems as “Highway to Heck,” “She’s Got Guts,” and “You ***** Me All Night Long.”

Bad Boys and GirlsAnimal FilesHypolitics 2008

14 Responses to “Wal-Mart Teams Up With AC/DC for New Album”


  1. 1 Hurricane Jun 10th, 2008 at 11:02 am

    Big Galas / H-double-hockeysticks Bells / If You Want Red Stuff, You Got It

  2. 2 jj Jun 10th, 2008 at 11:04 am

    Oh boy…but it’s ok for them to sell violent video games like ‘Ninja Gaiden’ where the characters slice each other in half.

  3. 3 Zorg the Defender Jun 10th, 2008 at 11:08 am

    Wow! In 1983 when I was 20, I took my 15 year old brother to see AC/DC at the Meadowlands. My mother was furious. She was convinced I was in a satanic cult and that my brother would become posessed. It was a debauchery fest!! Best “in your face” rock ever. Now they’re accepted at Walmart?! WTF…Satanism isn’t what it used to be.

  4. 4 Chronic Malanga Jun 10th, 2008 at 11:31 am

    As a long time AC/DC fan, I am going to reserve my disappointment for Wal-Mart, a place I refused to shop at in the States even if I had to go out of my way and pay more elsewhere for precisely this issue of sanitizing music for the masses. After all, they are truly the hypocrites here given AC/DC’s music.

  5. 5 Toubrouk Jun 10th, 2008 at 11:53 am

    Damn! I never thought I would see the day where AC/DC would receive the “Family-Friendly” sticker! This brought to my mind the following question: do we became so jaded to not be impress by their music or AC/DC turned into a brunch of pussies?

  6. 6 Morgan Jun 10th, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    And yet, when I was in the walmart in my area for the first time in 2 years (what can I say, I craved a midnight shopping spree) as I was in the checkout, one of the magazines had Stephanie Tanner on it, and in HUGE BOLD LETTERS IT SAID:

    “FROM METH ADDICT TO MOM!”

    Yay, family friendly!

  7. 7 Pastafarian Jun 10th, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    You’re right Zorg. Satanism isn’t what it used to be. I went to Chuck E. Cheese for my friends kids’ birthday party and the animal band was CRANKIN’ King Diamond.

  8. 8 Scott F. Jun 10th, 2008 at 2:02 pm

    I hate to do this, but I’ve gotta disagree a tiny bit. I used to hate Walmart’s censorship stance with a passion, but the more I thought about it, the smarter it sounded to me.

    Walmart sanitizes their music, but still garners a 10% share of the market - and if you think about it, that benefits EVERYONE. Has anyone else noticed that we’re not hearing all the b.s. we did in the 90’s about the government censoring music, film, and video games? Yeah, you see it in certain states and local areas, but not on a national level. Why is that? I firmly believe it’s because of Walmart.

    Those parents that were bitching now have a place to buy their kids music while having peace of mind (regardless of the fact it’s still the same damn music). It shut them the f*** up, and is keeping them from demanding that censorship extend to everyone via the government. Seriously, wouldn’t you rather have the capitalist system working as it is, with some stores offering censored versions and others offering uncut versions, and the market deciding which to buy, instead of the government stepping in and censoring EVERYTHING? Lesser of 2 evils folks, lesser of 2 evils.

  9. 9 Carlo Jun 10th, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    Some other name changes: For Those About to Waltz, We Commend You (cannons replaced with violins); Rock N’ Roll IS Noise Pollution; Odd Jobs Done for a Fair Price; Hoot for Bill; Givin’ the Canine a Snack; Problem Child Should be Punished

  10. 10 Simon Scowl Jun 10th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    She’s Got the Jack (Cheese)

  11. 11 Rocko Jun 10th, 2008 at 5:49 pm

    Scott F. “Hot Coffee” mod ring any bells? That was what, two years ago? They talked all about censoring then.

    But more importantly, why is AC/DC releasing a new record? All anyone wants to hear is the old songs anyway.

  12. 12 Pastafarian Jun 10th, 2008 at 6:00 pm

    Right Rocko. I like AC/DC but after “Back in Black”? Eh.

  13. 13 jlynn Jun 10th, 2008 at 9:50 pm

    Chronic Malanga, why would you just be disappointed in Wal Mart, the deal had to have been mutual. Being an AC/DC fan, wouldn’t you share more of that disappointment with the band? A rock band known for dirty lyrics signing an exclusive deal for an album with a mega chain who’s known for offering clean albums seems much more hypocritical than said mega chain signing an exclusive album deal with artists who are willing to make and sell a Wal mart friendly album. Wal mart hasn’t changed their ways. In my opinion, AC/DC get more of the hypocritical credit.

  14. 14 Aleric Jun 11th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Scott F, the reason you don’t hear all the BS about censorship and labeling records and movies from the 90’s is that TIPPER GORE is no longer in the spot light. Al Gore has her licking envelopes for his Global Warming scam. The Liberals are not there any longer to try and take away your Constitutional rights.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




June 2008
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella