Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
27
Jun
08

Larry Craig Wants to Keep People Like Larry Craig from Marrying Other People Like Larry Craig

According to the Carpetbagger Report, a group of Republican senators has reintroduced the Federal Marriage Amendment, AKA the “Omigod, What Does Sulu Think He’s Doing?” Act. And wouldn’t you know it, two of the sponsors are Larry “The Toilet Tapdancer” Craig and David “Pays Women Other Than His Wife for Sex” Vitter. Consider the institution of marriage saved from the brink!

Remember when Mick Jagger and David Bowie teamed up to do that cover of “Dancing in the Street,” and it was like rockstar-squared? This is kind of the same deal, except with hypocrisy instead of music. And even gayer.

Bad Boys and GirlsAnimal FilesHypolitics 2008

10 Responses to “Larry Craig Wants to Keep People Like Larry Craig from Marrying Other People Like Larry Craig”


  1. 1 Pastafarian Jun 27th, 2008 at 3:25 pm

    I don’t think ANYTHING could be gayer than Mick Jagger/David Bowie’s “Dancing in the Street”.

  2. 2 Hurricane Jun 27th, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    Pasta took the words right outta my fingertips! Damn you!

  3. 3 Golliwog's Cakewalk Jun 27th, 2008 at 4:38 pm

    When are these sorry excuses for Senators going to realize that they should stop trying to legislate morality? Stick to things you’re good at, like picking our pockets, outfitting our troops with faulty body armor, and mucking up our foreign policy.

    Leave moral issues to the state governments! At least that way if we don’t like California’s gay marriage law, we can move to Utah! Yeah, that’s the ticket …

  4. 4 llamasrule Jun 27th, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Nothing to add, really, I just want to say the title of this is hilarious. wonder if Larry Craig googles himself….

  5. 5 Chronic Malanga Jun 28th, 2008 at 4:37 am

    That video was very gay…

    But yeah, I’ve with Golliwog and would be even more thrilled if morality were not legislated at all.

  6. 6 llamasrule Jun 30th, 2008 at 6:20 pm

    Well actually morality has always been legislated in a very vague, broad sense. It is against the law to kill (sometimes) or steal (unless you are a politician). Right or wrong? Who decides? I personally think it is more ok than not for a starving person to steal an apple, but the law would disagree. But yeah, methinks they try to go too far sometimes.

  7. 7 Chronic Malanga Jun 30th, 2008 at 7:01 pm

    You said it better than I could have llamasrule.

  8. 8 Drd Doug Jun 30th, 2008 at 11:44 pm

    Of course, Of course, two guys who are married but don’t honor marriage trying to pass a law telling others what to do concerning marriage.

  9. 9 obloodyhell Jul 4th, 2008 at 1:41 am

    Hey, regardless of what you think of the basic concept, I’ve read the police report for Craig’s arrest (it’s over at The Smoking Gun, IIRC). I have rarely in my life seen a bigger crock of sh** excuse for an arrest than that one. If the officers in question weren’t bitchslapped by the court, they should have been. So using that against the man is a very cheap shot.

  1. 1 Hot Air » Blog Archive » Super: Co-sponsors of Federal Marriage Amendment are Larry Craig and David Vitter Pingback on Jun 27th, 2008 at 4:29 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




June 2008
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella