Comments on: Will Smith Is Suddenly a Whole Lot Less Scientologist

By: LYTEUP

LYTEUP — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:51:15 +0000

Will Smith is the poor man’s version of Denzel Washington.

By: Oh well

Oh well — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:10:03 +0000

people are obviously watching it no matter reviews say
GO HANCOCO

By: Dear Pot, Love Kettle

Dear Pot, Love Kettle — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:01:49 +0000

It only got 2 1/2 stars in my local paper.

By: That Image.

That Image. — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:24:46 +0000

Just like a city crew, one man “working” and a bunch of others standing around.

By: llamasrule

llamasrule — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:04:26 +0000

“Seems someone has told will it is better to be liked than be a good actor, after all it has worked so well for Tom.”

I knew that Will and Tom becoming BFF would eventually bite WS on the butt. Of course, my first thought was I couldn’t believe he would buy into Scientology, but was not sure that it would really hurt him career-wise. Just in the respect department.

By: Hurricane

Hurricane — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:46:01 +0000

Story had good potential. Cast too. Looks like an early morning, hang over from hell, can’t get off the couch or change the channel movie to watch.

By: Aleric

Aleric — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:18:09 +0000

The problem with Hancock is that they wanted to make a hard edged look at a super hero that was not a nice person. So they crafted a script to showcase all the things Superman would never do and so Hancock was born, but sometime after filming they realized that with all the cussing and inappropriate actions that several things would happen. The movie would get an “R” rating, Will Smith would not be the “Good Guy”, so the cuts began. By the time they trimmed it down to a PG rating and edited it to reflect well on Will, they were left with a shell of what could have been a good movie. Most of the good parts of the movie you are seeing in the trailers.

Seems someone has told will it is better to be liked than be a good actor, after all it has worked so well for Tom.

By: Pastafarian

Pastafarian — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:13:41 +0000

The obvious porno knockoff title is just much too easy. They really should have tried harder. It’s no “Pocahontas” is it now.

By: Carlo

Carlo — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:04:30 +0000

Maybe it’s just a bad movie.

By: Chronic Malanga

Chronic Malanga — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:57:51 +0000

Same here, jlynn. I’ll probably watch it at some point regardless, only because I am always intrigued by bratty kids getting thrown around.