Recently Batman made PETA’s “Top 10 Animal-Friendly Superheroes” list — and let’s just stop and think for a second about anyone seeing the need for a “Top 10 Animal-Friendly Superheroes” list — presumably because his costume is not made from actual bats. But now the Caped Crusader is on their guano list! They’ve decided he’s not so animal-friendly after all. Why? Well, it’s all very logical:
Batman is an icon, a superhero genius that beats up gun-toting thugs using only his iron fist of justice-—KA-POW! He looks damn good in pleather while owning the streets, yet in The Dark Knight, he was punching out dogs left and right. Sure, it was self-defense, but doesn’t the man with the James Bond gadgets know anything about peanut butter treats and deflecting devices?
I had my problems with the wildly overrated Batman sequel, but I wasn’t bored enough to think the franchise should have ended with Bruce Wayne being eaten alive by attack dogs.
And hey, it’s not like he abducted them under the pretense of finding them good homes, killed them, and left their corpses to rot in a dumpster behind a Piggly Wiggly. Don’t worry, PETA: the Dark Knight ain’t bitin’ your style.
(Hat tip: Deceiver reader Ben Kalish)
P.S. Besides which, they don’t say a word about all the people, actual human beings, the Joker killed in the movie. Presumably PETA is all in favor of that. Fewer people means fewer threats to all the poor precious animals, right?
P.P.S. Bloggasm talked to Christine Doré, the PETA employee who wrote that blog post, and asked her to explain. She was somewhat less than illuminating.




Why does Perez Hilton spend so much time in court? Maybe the courthouse has a really good cafeteria. The dullwitted, donut-demolishing diva’s latest target is a site called 