Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
31
Jul
08

Condé Nast Is Behind the Times

An intrepid, possibly soon-to-be-axed reporter for Condé Nast Portfolio magazine let it slip that his employer empties their corporate recycling bins into a dumpster.

But that hasn’t stopped them from signing on to the Magazine Publishers of America’s campaign to get subscribers to recycle their old issues.

Jeff Bercovici on the Mixed Media blog writes:

At a certain major magazine publisher — because I work there, I won’t reveal its name other than to say it makes up the first two words in the name of my magazine — it’s an open secret that the ubiquitous blue recycling bins actually get emptied into the trash. I’m still waiting to hear back from a spokeswoman about just why it is this company, which is known for lavishing money on its top editors and executives in the form of clothing allowances and no-interest loans, and which always has a line of Town Cars idling outside its 43rd Street entrance, can’t seem to find a way to recycle the tons upon tons of paper it discards every year, as its two main competitors, Hearst and Time Inc., already do. And seeing as this company is a member of MPA, and thus a de facto sponsor of its “Please Recycle This Magazine” campaign, it would seem just a tad hypocritical not to address this matter in short order.

Truly, no snark here. It is really pathetic that in this day and age, they can’t figure out how to recycle paper.

Bad Boys and GirlsAnimal FilesHypolitics 2008

5 Responses to “Condé Nast Is Behind the Times”


  1. 1 Pastafarian Jul 31st, 2008 at 5:13 pm

    Where is this strange universe where people still read magazines?

  2. 2 Phoenix Jul 31st, 2008 at 5:49 pm

    My theory is that the folks there can write, but can’t read. They can put out a magazine and talk about how you should recycle it, but can’t read into municipal recycling programs…or read their own rhetoric. That coupled with chronic lack of common sense and an epidemic of what-I-just-preached amnesia could explain all the green hypocrisy.

  3. 3 Joe Shadows Jul 31st, 2008 at 5:59 pm

    Its like this at my corporation as well. I think its actually kind of universal, at this point- for some reason Facilities is required to provide recycle bins, but the office cleaners aren’t required to separate out the recycling and regular trash. No one in the office even bothers anymore.

    I think that this is a quirk of Corporate America at this point.

  4. 4 Rocko Jul 31st, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    I notice this about a lot of places. Same treatment with glass and plastic and cans, all in the same trash usually. It just makes me wonder about what happens to sensitive information. Maybe we should start calling them Conde Nasty, huh, huh? How about that one? You like that wordplay Holly? I think you might have an appreciation for puns.

  5. 5 Hi Heels Lo Life Aug 4th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

    “Conde Nasty”
    I think that one has been around since the Algonquin Round Table, when the people there actually wrote for Conde Nast in person …

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella