Comments on: What About Bob? http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/ The two-faced and famous have something new to worry about. Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:09:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Yet Another Rielle-Related Site Vanishes at Deceiver.com http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-8018 Yet Another Rielle-Related Site Vanishes at Deceiver.com Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:39:53 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-8018 [...] now the site has gone down the memory hole, along with Rielle’s site, Bob McGovern’s resume and contact info, and who knows what else. If John Edwards is telling the whole truth, why does information about [...] [...] now the site has gone down the memory hole, along with Rielle’s site, Bob McGovern’s resume and contact info, and who knows what else. If John Edwards is telling the whole truth, why does information about [...]

]]> By: Deceiver.tv at Deceiver.com http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-8007 Deceiver.tv at Deceiver.com Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:23:09 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-8007 [...] show The B-Cast (archived here), they devoted their first 30 minutes to the deleted-but-recovered Bob McGovern/Being Is Free material that I haven’t shut up about for weeks, what it means in the context [...] [...] show The B-Cast (archived here), they devoted their first 30 minutes to the deleted-but-recovered Bob McGovern/Being Is Free material that I haven’t shut up about for weeks, what it means in the context [...]

]]> By: John Edwards - Is He Still Lying? « think on these things http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-7974 John Edwards - Is He Still Lying? « think on these things Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:32:00 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-7974 [...] Robert McGovern, who Rielle calls “savior, healer of all healers.”  See:  http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/ and [...] [...] Robert McGovern, who Rielle calls “savior, healer of all healers.”  See:  http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/ and [...]

]]> By: SteveB http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-7884 SteveB Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:20:31 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-7884 I believe JEdwards took the huge risk going to the hotel to visit Hunter and his baby, because there were VERY important purposes for him. He had to convince her (perhaps indirectly) NOT to sell their entire story to the Enquirer for huge bucks, how she tricked him into her getting pregnant, all the sordid details, and he had to convince her NOT to take a paternity test for the baby, which would obviously prove him the father. As any skillful lawyer would, he probably convinced her that he really cares for her, perhaps loves her, and wants to take care of her and his baby but he has to respect Elizabeth -- and therefore can't do anything publicly. And if they can ever live together happily ever after, Hunter would have to respect Elizabeth as well for awhile, and keep the "fatherhood" issue private -- which was already done with stage 1 re the fatherless birth certificate. Then maybe they can get together. And therefore he'll be able to shout proudly to the media that he'll be happy to take a DNA test -- knowing full-well Hunter won't let it happen with the baby. But for all this to work, JEdwards would have had to stress to her over and over that he'll take care of her and his baby financially.......with more bucks and longer time-period than the Enquirer ever would. This all must've happened at the hotel.......it just makes too much sense with all the timing. But it could all come crashing down for JEdwards if he can't deliver on the future money to Hunter......and of course with reporters analyzing the money trail from every possible angle now.......it's possible the money trail will dry up and Hunter will have to sell the story........but this could be months or years. ? What do you think about this, Simon\ ? -SteveB I believe JEdwards took the huge risk going to the hotel to visit Hunter and his baby, because there were VERY important purposes for him. He had to convince her (perhaps indirectly) NOT to sell their entire story to the Enquirer for huge bucks, how she tricked him into her getting pregnant, all the sordid details, and he had to convince her NOT to take a paternity test for the baby, which would obviously prove him the father. As any skillful lawyer would, he probably convinced her that he really cares for her, perhaps loves her, and wants to take care of her and his baby but he has to respect Elizabeth — and therefore can’t do anything publicly. And if they can ever live together happily ever after, Hunter would have to respect Elizabeth as well for awhile, and keep the “fatherhood” issue private — which was already done with stage 1 re the fatherless birth certificate. Then maybe they can get together. And therefore he’ll be able to shout proudly to the media that he’ll be happy to take a DNA test — knowing full-well Hunter won’t let it happen with the baby. But for all this to work, JEdwards would have had to stress to her over and over that he’ll take care of her and his baby financially…….with more bucks and longer time-period than the Enquirer ever would.
This all must’ve happened at the hotel…….it just makes too much sense with all the timing. But it could all come crashing down for JEdwards if he can’t deliver on the future money to Hunter……and of course with reporters analyzing the money trail from every possible angle now…….it’s possible the money trail will dry up and Hunter will have to sell the story……..but this could be months or years. ? What do you think about this, Simon\ ? -SteveB

]]> By: Pajamas Media » Edwards: It’s the Cover-Up, Stupid http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-7876 Pajamas Media » Edwards: It’s the Cover-Up, Stupid Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:07:23 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-7876 [...] Edwards at the Beverly Hilton — which found Hunter escorted by her longtime New Age mentor, Bob McGovern, while Edwards dodged Enquirer reporters downstairs — only confirmed the truth her California [...] [...] Edwards at the Beverly Hilton — which found Hunter escorted by her longtime New Age mentor, Bob McGovern, while Edwards dodged Enquirer reporters downstairs — only confirmed the truth her California [...]

]]> By: Mainstream Media Uses Blogosphere as Unpaid Research Wing in Edwards Scandal | DBKP - The Worldwide Leader in Weird http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-7764 Mainstream Media Uses Blogosphere as Unpaid Research Wing in Edwards Scandal | DBKP - The Worldwide Leader in Weird Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:36:55 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-7764 [...] this. Pay particular attention to the date on [...] [...] this. Pay particular attention to the date on [...]

]]> By: Simon Scowl http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-7761 Simon Scowl Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:58:01 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-7761 Please point out the word "liberal" -- or, if you like, "librel" -- at any point in my post. Also, this story was true. It was loaded with facts that easily could have been checked by other reporters. They just didn't feel like it, apparently. Please point out the word “liberal” — or, if you like, “librel” — at any point in my post.

Also, this story was true. It was loaded with facts that easily could have been checked by other reporters. They just didn’t feel like it, apparently.

]]> By: civilact http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-7760 civilact Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:50:21 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-7760 The stoopid MSM is too librel to report on the National Enquirer's scoops! Like when the Enquirer reported Bush was drinking again after Katrina! That shoulda been front page of your local paper and all over CNN and maybe even Fox, but nooooooooo. Damn librels. And then the Sun reported that George and Condi were humping like bunnies. Did the librel MSM pick up on that one? Nooooooo. Damn librels. The stoopid MSM is too librel to report on the National Enquirer’s scoops! Like when the Enquirer reported Bush was drinking again after Katrina! That shoulda been front page of your local paper and all over CNN and maybe even Fox, but nooooooooo. Damn librels. And then the Sun reported that George and Condi were humping like bunnies. Did the librel MSM pick up on that one? Nooooooo. Damn librels.

]]> By: Sunday reading: Barackroll | President-Obama.com http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-7755 Sunday reading: Barackroll | President-Obama.com Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:21:19 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-7755 [...] friend and intermediary Bob McGovern’s job description is [...] [...] friend and intermediary Bob McGovern’s job description is [...]

]]> By: Kneave Riggall http://deceiver.com/2008/07/31/what-about-bob/#comment-7739 Kneave Riggall Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:14:45 +0000 http://deceiver.com/?p=1630#comment-7739 @ Doe Jul 31st, 2008 at 5:33 pm Doe, that's beautiful analysis. It seems that Rielle and McGovern (and/or another "friend" of Rielle) are running a version of the Badger game, with National Enquirer supplying the cash and the photographers. Very clever. Rielle will "support" John's stupid story -- as long as he (or his finance chair) continue to "support" her financially. Meanwhile, McGovern can sneak out the back door with baby pictures, meeting times, etc., to keep the pot boiling. Actually, the same thing happened to Alexander Hamilton in the 1790s, I believe. Some strumpet wound him up and then tried to blackmail him. The differences were: No baby and Hamilton confessed all when confronted by (as I remember) a Congressional committee. History doesn't just repeat itself; it never changes. @ Doe Jul 31st, 2008 at 5:33 pm

Doe, that’s beautiful analysis. It seems that Rielle and McGovern (and/or another “friend” of Rielle) are running a version of the Badger game, with National Enquirer supplying the cash and the photographers. Very clever. Rielle will “support” John’s stupid story — as long as he (or his finance chair) continue to “support” her financially. Meanwhile, McGovern can sneak out the back door with baby pictures, meeting times, etc., to keep the pot boiling.

Actually, the same thing happened to Alexander Hamilton in the 1790s, I believe. Some strumpet wound him up and then tried to blackmail him. The differences were: No baby and Hamilton confessed all when confronted by (as I remember) a Congressional committee. History doesn’t just repeat itself; it never changes.

]]>