Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network

Archive for August 6th, 2008

06
Aug

Jennifer Aniston’s Strategy: Deny, Deny, Deny

I want to start off by saying I think Jennifer Aniston gets an unfair rap. Unless she’s completely emotionally unstable, there’s no way she’s as obsessed with Brangelina as the tabloids would have you believe.

And I really don’t buy that she’s going to have a revenge baby.

However, OK! magazine decided to run a cover story based on “insiders” and “sources” that she’s planning a big ol’ wedding to John Mayer this year.

And her press rep Stephen Huvane came right back and denied it.

But you know what else Stephen Huvane has denied over the years? Pretty much Jennifer Aniston’s very existence. According to Us Magazine, a review:

1) BRAD AND JEN ARE NOT ENGAGED
After Jen and then-boyfriend **Brad Pitt** took the stage during a Sting concert in November 1999 and Jen flashed a big diamond ring on her left ring finger, Huvane told the media: “She has a ring, but it’s not an engagement ring.” He continued to deny any engagement until the couple married July 29, 2000.

2) BRAD AND JEN ARE OK
Two weeks before Brad and Jen announced their separation on January 7, 2005, Huvane told Us: “They are looking forward to spending the holidays with each other. There is no split. They are fine.”

3) JEN ISN’T MOVING TO HER FORMER BACHELORETTE PAD
In February 2005, Huvane denied reports that Aniston was planning to move back into her former Hollywood Hills home, telling the New York Daily News, “Jennifer is not planning to move back into her home that is leased out to Ali G [Sacha Baron Cohen]. That is another fabrication.” Cohen and his fiance, Isla Fisher, were ousted from the place that same month, Aniston moved back into her old pad later that year, and Vaughn joined her in January 2006.

4) JEN AND VINCE ARE NOT DATING
When pictures of Vince and Jen cuddling on the set of The Break-Up surfaced in July 2005, and rumors circulated that the costars were dating offscreen, Huvane denied the coupling to the New York Post: “There is no romantic interest. Vince is a good friend of Jennifer’s. I think the tabloids are so eager to see her with someone romantically that they just make these false assumptions.”

5) GWYNETH IS NOT DEPRESSED
In 2003, rumors surfaced that **Gwyneth Paltrow**’s depression over her father’s death caused the actress to drop out of the films I Heart Huckabees and Happy Endings. Huvane, who is also Gwyneth’s publicist, denied the reports, saying, “She’s not going through a serious depression, she just needs some time off.”

“I was so depressed about my father,” the actress later said of the time in her life.

What’s the point of having a publicist if you don’t want any publicity?

06
Aug

The John Edwards Anti-Scandal Continues to Not Continue

Note: As I was typing up my latest opus on this subject, the National Enquirer finally posted some of the photos everybody’s been demanding. Cry “Photoshop,” and let slip the dogs of denial!

There he is, allegedly, with his alleged baby. I think the pic in the lower-left corner is supposed to be from when the Enquirer guys, well, cornered him. Allegedly. Either that or he’s being shocked with defibrillator paddles. [Correction: According to a commenter at JammieWearingFool, the caption says: "Earlier this year, Edwards was seen wearing a similar T-shirt with a similar sweat stain at a workout in New York (left).] And the arrows there are comparing the curtains behind him with the ones in the Beverly Hilton. Curtains, how appropriate…

Boy, you skip a day on the John Edwards/Rielle Hunter non-story and you miss a lot of non-news. Let me try to play catch-up here:

First and Foremost: Slate’s Mickey Kaus, Rielle-Hunter #1, lists five good reasons to cover this. (Personally, I only need one: because the people who are supposed to be covering it aren’t.) Kaus slaps down the “He’s not a politician anymore!” argument, points out Edwards’ alleged hypocrisy, and much more. I only had one quibble with it:

If the scandal is true, it almost certainly means that during the campaign Edwards presided over an elaborate coverup involving at least a) having an aide wrongly claim paternity and b) having other aides go out and lie to reporters.

While I appreciate his choice of the verb “preside,” considering Edwards’ obvious White House ambitions, the past tense isn’t really appropriate here. As I’ve tried to show, almost every available scrap of background information on Rielle Hunter and her palm-reading buddies is currently being scrubbed from the Internet. The coverup is ongoing.

Speaking of the Coverup: Those dirty, nasty sleazemongers at the National Enquirer just keep ruining journalism by reporting easily verifiable facts that some people find unpleasant. According to DBKP, the latest issue of the Enquirer claims that Andrew Young, the purported father of 5-month-old Frances Quinn Hunter, has moved from North Carolina to Santa Barbara to be closer to mother Rielle and the child. And guess who he brought with him?

“Young had to pretend to be by [Rielle's] side — but he’s living in a separate home with his wife and young children. The word is that he’s sick of living this lie. His wife Cheri is particularly fed up,” said the source.

Young and his wife are still married, despite his claim that he fathered Rielle’s child, a claim that sources say is absolutely false and part of Edwards’ elaborate coverup.

Reminds me of that old song: “If You Leave Me, Can I Come Too?” DBKP adds:

Now, a reliable DBKP source reports that Young is indeed in Santa Barbara, “living large with no visible means of support.”

If you believe the Enquirer’s earlier report that Young is getting at least $15,000 a month to continue the ruse, then yes, his financial support is indeed invisible as far as the mainstream press is concerned.

Of course, this information is coming from scummy tabloids and miserable blogs. Why would a single “legitimate” journalist in the whole country want to, y’know, check?

Cheri Young Is a Saint: Thank you to Deceiver readers “Fortunate Son” and the ever-reliable Kris for the tip about Cheri Young’s participation in Oprah’s Pay It Forward Challenge back in 2006. Cheri, along with 300 other Oprah audience members, was given $1,000 and told to use it to help the less fortunate. Within a week, she had raised over $35,000 for needy families in western North Carolina:

Continue reading ‘The John Edwards Anti-Scandal Continues to Not Continue’

06
Aug

It’s a Good Thing Pam Anderson Doesn’t Read Deceiver

If she did, she might realize how ridiculous she looks to normal people and quit being so entertainingly brainless. Probably not, but it’s possible. Not to mention that she’d know that the KFC “vegetarian” fake-chicken sandwich she’s chowing down on here was cooked in the same fryer as the dead animal parts. PETA = Pam’s Eating Tallow from Animals!

(Hat tip: Mollygood)

She must have been hungry after traveling back from Australia, where last month she led an anti-KFC rally. That is, when she wasn’t appearing on the Aussie version of Big Brother, which was sponsored by… can you guess?

By the way, does that sandwich contain mushrooms? (Bottom-right corner. Once seen, cannot be unseen.)




August 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress

people like you crave deceiver

  • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

  • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

  • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

  • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

  • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

  • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

  • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

  • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

  • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

  • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

  • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

  • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

  • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

  • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella