Wow, dogsniff. For someone who knows virtually nothing about the woman, it’s nice to see you not reflexively retreating head-long into elitist, liberal stereotyping.

We’ll all pay dearly when she goes toe-to-toe against Joe Biden’s superior *cough* IQ, won’t we?

To end Sarah’s turmoil I’ll say again, “Sarah Palin reminds me of the type of woman whose sofa is covered in tater chip dust and smells of Hamburger Helper and Motor oil” – and for Brucie I’ll add the lingering stench of a Grizzly Carcass that died violently at the end of a gun for no other reason but to decorate said smelly couch.

That’s what type of woman she reminds me of.

What it reminded a certain other reader of – or so she/he says – are “white trash”.

I can’t help you any further, dear. I have enjoyed you trying to put words in my mouth – but not that much.

Forgive the boring discourse – I shall try to avoid using “poetic” descriptions of Sarah’s personal furniture in the future.

http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/palin-republican-party-infiltrator-damning-video/#comments

Of course, this could be another youtube joke. I can’t watch it at work.

Please point out the part where I was calling names. No?

Can I ask a *third* time what you meant by “type of woman”? Gonna ever say what the heck that was about? No?

So the fact I was asking what on earth you meant by that random and rather poetic first post means you “hit a ‘truth’ nerve” ? Nope. Although it must be fun to live in a world that anytime someone asks what you mean, that means what you said is true.

I did read your comments. And this is a blog! Congratulations on recognizing that, that’s the first sign I’ve seen so far that you understand basic communication. Did you read my comments? Where all I did was ask what you meant? Awesome how that means I was conservative and name calling. Did ya read the one where I said I wasn’t and asked again what you meant? Awesome, apparently that meant that you spoke the “truth” and I didn’t like the lower middle class working people getting all undone about it.

I am liberal, lower middle class working people, and am amazed at your mastery of misdirection. Since you seem to revel in assuming completely random and non factual things, I’m going to make a few assumptions. I’ll hafta assume from now on you’re either just trolling or are actually just incapable of communicating what you mean and got lost in a fog of “nuh-uh, you are!” retorts. Either way, you have my sympathy. But after two tries to ask you what on earth you’re talking about, I’ve hit my limit.

But I admit I’m curious as to how you’ll respond to this as further proof that I am in fact Sarah herself in all her Republican glory…as proven by my name calling and aversion to the truth of your words. Or whatever else you’ll pretend I said.

Disparaging Sarah Palin is out (because people notice she is more qualified than Obama – and it makes them look insane) and attack McCain is in.

Oh … and panic is the new emotion:

“In the new poll, taken Friday through Sunday, McCain leads Obama by 54%-44% among those seen as most likely to vote.”

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-07-poll_N.htm

Just a sec, gotta wipe the tater chip dust off my keyboard…

You kind of need to read my original post, Phoenix. Nobody is calling names but you… Bruce said she had a grizzly carcass on her couch.

We are commenting here, yes? (I just pinched myself and looked at the monitor through the Hamburger Helper and Twinkie grease film – and sure enough – these are comments on a blog.)

Looks like I hit a “truth” nerve somewhere – and that SOMEONE sure doesn’t like lower middle class working people to get all undone about it?

I am not conservative. I did not call her white trash. I asked why you are using every white trash stereotype to refer to her. They are white trash stereotypes. That’s your problem for using them, not mine. Me asking you what you are implying is not “slinging it”, nor is it name calling.

I asked you a question. What “type of woman” are you referring to? If you had answered that instead of pretending that I am the one slandering her, your post might have had some actual content.

Not everyone who calls you on your completely baseless, facetious description of meaningless details of someone’s life is necessarily conservative and mud slinging. Disagreeing with what you say doesn’t make me the embodiment of everything you hate. But I know realize that is very hard to understand for some people, so if you need to think the entire world is wrong for questioning you, fine. Just know that the rest of us can see through the projectionist tactics you’re so poorly employing.