Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network

Archive for September 16th, 2008

16
Sep

Britney Spears! Live and Uncensored! (My ears hurt.)

Before you press “play” on this video, you may want to consider the future health of your hearing. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

For context, this appears to be a live “board tape” of Britney Spears’ microphone track (without any digital processing) from a 2001 Las Vegas show, which HBO later aired as a broadcast special. Someone then synced up the audio, which was first leaked to a file-sharing fansite in Poland (don’t say we didn’t do our research…), with selected bits of the HBO video to make the finished product.

The final video illustrates a number of things, not the least of which is why big stars have backup singers, and how unrealistic it is for teens and ‘tweens to expect their favorite “singers” to dance and make any kind of noise worth paying to hear at the same time.

So without further ado, this is what Brit-Brit really sounds like when she’s on stage.

It’s her world, folks. We just live in it.

YouTube Preview Image

Apologies if you’ve seen this before, but I was entertained.

A hat tip goes to Deceiver reader Henrik, who wrote all the way from Sweden to share the video.

16
Sep

Sam Malone Cries “Mayday” For Fish, But Keeps On Eating ‘Em

Remember Ted Danson? He’s a very, very old and washed-up TV actor who used to play a bartender named Sam “Mayday” Malone on a popular show called “Cheers,” back when Shelley Long was famous and Kirstie Alley was attractive. Then he started dating Whoopie Goldberg, completely lost it, and appeared on stage in blackface at a Friar’s Club “roast” of the aforementioned dreadlock-comic.

Smooth move, Ted. Spike Lee was not impressed, and his career never really recovered. (The slide into obscurity was, of course, greased by “Becker,” a TV series whose only redeeming feature was not Ted Danson.) But since then, Ted has reinvented himself as an environmental advocate, crusading for ocean protection.

How’s that going?

Here’s Danson, in a column published yesterday by the BBC in London:

[P]ollution isn’t the biggest problem facing the oceans, though it is certainly important.

It’s overfishing. We’re just taking too many fish out of the sea.

Since 1950, 90% of the big predator fish – your swordfish, your shark – have disappeared … Even as a lay person, not a scientist, it’s abundantly clear to me that overfishing is pushing our oceans towards an irreversible collapse.

That’s some scary stuff, Ted. Irreversible collapse, you say? Overfishing? No more fish in the sea? I bet you don’t eat fish, right? ‘Cause — you know — that would be highly irregular. Hypocritical, some might say.

London’s Telegraph newspaper gave him a perfect platform to argue for saving the oceans from overfishing this morning, but all he wanted to talk about was saving sharks. Saving sharks? I guess he’s never seen “Jaws.” That big Great White sucka would eat Sam Malone, Diane Chambers, Coach, Woody, Norm, Cliff, and Carla if we gave it half a chance.

Mr. Danson said current controls on shark fishing in Europe are “grossly inadequate”.

However the actor did not urge Brits to give up on their national dish altogether, just to check that rock salmon is not in the ingredients and to join the campaign to try to increase controls on shark fishing around Europe.

He added: “I love fish and I love fish and chips. I am not going to stop eating fish and chips. Not eating fish and chips is not going to have an impact necessarily. What is needed is to become an activist to try to get the policy changed on shark fishing.”

Gotcha. Sam Malone says we’re killing the oceans by eating too much fish. But we’ve gotta keep it up. ‘Cause fish-and-chips are just so deeeeeelicious!

Thanks for clearing that up, Sam! (I liked you better in blackface.)

Bonus Points, just for fun: The whole “Cheers” theme song and opening credits. Weren’t the ’80s fun, back before Ted Danson got all serious about himself?

16
Sep

Senate Records: Obama Talks “Pay Equity” But Walks Somethin’ Else

Update: I heard an Obama radio ad this morning that targeted this very issue, and voila! There’s a YouTube version with video. This takes balls. I’ll give him that.

YouTube Preview Image

I could probably write a page and a half here about why the National Organization for Women endorsed Barack Obama and Joe Biden this morning, instead of the ticket that includes … I don’t know … a woman …?

Can you imagine the NAACP not endorsing Obama? Or the Veterans of Foreign Wars not endorsing McCain? Or the Global Association of Political-Speech Plagiarists not … well, you get the picture.

Oh, right. I forgot. A University of Chicago religion professor decided (in Newsweek, no less) that Sarah Palin isn’t actually a woman — but merely offers the “pretense that she is a woman.” You can look it up. So I guess that makes all the identity-politics wrangling moot. Gosh, I feel better now.

But back to why I put this issue in play. Here’s Barack Obama’s website on the issue of Pay Equity:

“Despite decades of progress, women still make only 77 cents for every dollar a man makes. Throughout his career, Barack Obama has championed the right of women to receive equal pay for equal work.”

Here’s Obama, talking two weeks ago in Toledo about GOP vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin:

“[She] seems like a very engaging person, nice person. But I’ve got to say, she’s opposed, like John McCain is, to equal pay for equal work. That doesn’t make much sense to me.”

And now, here’s the interesting part. Scripps-Howard columnist Deroy Murdock took a look at the Senate staff salaries of both Barack Obama and John McCain, thanks to LegiStorm, a nonpartisan watchdog service that offers the raw data to anyone who wants to dig through it. Guess what Murdock found?

Obama’s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama’s average male employee earned $54,397. Obama’s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average … on average, Obama’s female staffers earn just 83 cents for every dollar his male staffers make …

McCain’s payment patterns are the stuff of feminist dreams. McCain’s 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878. On average, according to these data, women in McCain’s office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes.

Can anyone think of a living American feminist icon who’s not openly supporting Barack Obama? Just wondering.

16
Sep

McCain: Mac Moron or Microprocessor Maven?

Detente is over! We did it: one whole week without mentioning all that dumb political stuff. And now, back to boring you with tedious details about the people who want to run our country. Not to mention the politicians they hate.

Hey, you know how John McCain is a clueless old fart who doesn’t know Steve Jobs from Steve Austin? Jacob Weisberg at Slate.com sure does. On Aug. 23, he said:

McCain represents a Cold War style of nationalism that doesn’t get the shift from geopolitics to geoeconomics, the centrality of soft power in a multipolar world, or the transformative nature of digital technology. This is a matter of attitude as much as age. A lot of 71-year-olds are still learning and evolving. But in 2008, being flummoxed by that newfangled doodad, the personal computer, seems like a deal-breaker.

What a throwback that McCain is, huh? “Kids these days, with their dungarees and their social networking!” Which totally backs up what Weisberg himself said at Slate on Feb. 11, 2000:

In the first “Net Election” column back in September, I made the prediction that the Internet probably would not have a decisive impact on the 2000 presidential race. The best shot at proving me wrong now belongs to John McCain. If McCain survives South Carolina and goes on to defeat George W. Bush for the Republican nomination — still a very big if — the Internet may eventually be judged not just a contributing factor, but an essential, enabling condition of his victory.

Six months ago, no one would have pegged McCain as the most cybersavvy of this year’s crop of candidates. At 63, he is the oldest of the bunch and because of his war injuries, he is limited in his ability to wield a keyboard. But McCain’s job as chairman of the Senate commerce committee forced him to learn about the Internet early on, and young Web entrepreneurs such as Jerry Yang and Jeff Bezos fascinate him.

What a fuddy-duddy. Nice try, old man!

And remember Rielle Hunter? Seems like ages. Well, here are a few tidbits on that story that have fallen through the cracks here at Deceiver:

  • John & Rielle literally saw each other across a crowded room. And when they met:

    Face to face, their connection was instant. They spoke briefly, and could have left it at that. But they didn’t.

    Good point. More on this timeless love story at the LA Times. That’s right, I said the LA Times!

  • The WSJ Law Blog reports on givethemoneyback.com, which is saying that everybody who’s received money from Fred Baron should… take a guess.
  • Gob Bluth lookalike Andrew Young, who at last report had not withdrawn his claim to be the father of Rielle’s baby, is building a nice new house at the end of a private drive in North Carolina. Presumably he and his wife Cheri can afford it! Maybe he saved up all the money he hasn’t been paying Rielle for child support. Allegedly.

And I suppose now I’m obliged to cover the latest Palin scandal. Tell you what: Why don’t you pick whichever earthshattering contretemps they’re talking about at the time you’re reading this, assuming it hasn’t been debunked already, and discuss it amongst yourselves. I can’t keep them all straight. (Today it’s something about a tanning bed, right? That’s what took down Nixon, ya know.)




September 2008
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Emerson: Great, if you want to define “Real”...
    • Tom: SJSnarker, Yikes that is some stomach turning tax...
    • Imabear: While I enjoy food, I don’t consider...
    • Wow: John, because you’re being an obnoxious dick.
    • angry army wife: John, All the posts are delayed for...
    • John: I will ask again Why am I censored
    • John: why am i censored
    • John: “After this year, I think the Ed Block folks...
    • John: After this year, I think the Ed Block folks may...
    • jenny: @Pearce….. So sad for your loss. My...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella