Comments on: Brad Pitt Likes (Approved) Gays

By: johnna

johnna — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:20:43 +0000

i definitely think this post is a stretch. it’s just a stupid skit they did. plus, the reason larry craig was so persecuted was not because he was a “bad-behaving” gay, but that he had supported so much legislation against the gays…and turned out being one.

and i happened to like fight club, burn after reading, troy, se7en, and true romance. i don’t think he’s that poor of an actor.

By: Poor & Destitute

Poor & Destitute — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:38:50 +0000

I think Brad & Angelina should instead pledge not to fly private jet, or first class, or stay in penthouses in fancy motels until the rest of us are allowed to. Or how about not eating fine dining until hunger is abolished.

Oh wait, you just won’t get married since it is so sacred to you anyway (how did your previous marriages work out?)…..

Love the logic Hollywood has….

By: May

May — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:26:44 +0000

Nice, Mickey, comparing gay people to pedophiles. Yeah, it’s TOTALLY the same thing! One is about mutual desire and sometimes even love between two consenting adults, and the other is about raping little kids and messing them up for life. Great comparison.

Whatever – I commend Brad Pitt for donating money to cause that needs support, and as for that sketch, it was meant to be humorous, it wasn’t disparaging to homosexual people. Besides, he mocked a man who is a hypocrite, and who blocked legislation to give equal rights to all people – the fact that he’s actually gay himself only makes his decisions and votes that much ridiculous. Love is love, and if it’s against your religion, then fine! Don’t marry someone who’s of the same sex as you! But why should your moral and religious views get in the way of somebody else’s happiness? Separation of church and state indeed. I fail to see how his donation via this old sketch he played in lands Brad a spot on deceiver. There are bigger hypocrites than a man who gave a considerable amount of money to a good cause.

By: Mickey Blue Eyes

Mickey Blue Eyes — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:43:04 +0000

I was kinda wondering about that. Brad Bitt and his baby-momma Angelina have been popping out bastard babies and said they will not marry until everyone can marry. Well, now the gays can marry so what’s the hold-up?

Maybe when Brad said “everyone” he didn’t mean JUST the gays, but also pedophiles, beastialiphiles (sp?), necrophiles, and every other sexual perversion one can think of?

Maybe only when a man can marry a toddler, a goat, and a corpse, will he make Angelina an honest woman?

By: StrawberryGirl

StrawberryGirl — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:02:40 +0000

Brad’s just sucking up to half of his fan base.

By: Syd

Syd — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:02:47 +0000

I suspect he could never do enough to gain Dayna’s approval.

It’s a nice gesture on his part. Comedy gets a pretty big pass from me on most issues…as long as it’s FUNNY.

By: Jrod

Jrod — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:22:41 +0000

Fortunate Son – Comment of the year.

By: Fortunate Son

Fortunate Son — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:20:21 +0000

Robert DeNiro keeps on getting into trouble, good candidate for Deceiver of the year.

DeNiro campaigns (2:30 of video) about “leaving millions of our friends and neighbors in poverty.. …families denied basic medical care and decent education…”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akApqZPnyf4

yet gets sued for stealing employees tips???:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080919/lf_nm_life/newyork_restaurants_tips_dc_2

His 2007 Tribeca film festival was co-sponsored by “Save Our Selves, Campaign for Climate Change, yet all three of DeNiro’s restaurants were busted for serving endangered Tuna:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/09/06/eatuna106.xml

By: Dayna

Dayna — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:15:55 +0000

Well considering the millions they got paid for simply posing for a People magazine cover, and the millions they shell out jet-setting around the world..not to mention that 100,000 is less than even what they pay to live in their fancy chateau..well, i’d say $100,000 bucks is pretty much just pocket change, and a little something to keep them in the news and make them look like honest, decent, liberal people. I mean, if you are so intent on the right to marry that you refuse to even marry yourself until all marriage is equal in the eyes of this country, then wouldn’t donating more than 100 grand possibly be more appropriate? Like maybe donating time and effort to the cause instead of just throwing out a lowly amount that’s a joke to you? C’mon, Brad!

By: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg

Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:04:45 +0000

” It’s funny that you compare marriage (a voluntary transaction that benefits both parties [at least under the law]) to paying taxes (a wholly involuntary transaction backed up by threats of violence.)”

Not acording to Joe Biden. Up to this point I’m an uber-patriot!