<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Starbucks &#8220;Drip&#8221; Is Actually A Wasteful Gusher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/</link>
	<description>The two-faced and famous have something new to worry about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:55:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kelli</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11618</link>
		<dc:creator>kelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11618</guid>
		<description>They are purposing this idea here in New Zealand. Its such a waste of water when so many countries in the world don&#039;t have access to fresh water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are purposing this idea here in New Zealand. Its such a waste of water when so many countries in the world don&#8217;t have access to fresh water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastafarian</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11596</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastafarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11596</guid>
		<description>We could still invade Canada. It&#039;s Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could still invade Canada. It&#8217;s Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minnow</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11580</link>
		<dc:creator>Minnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11580</guid>
		<description>Pasta: They can&#039;t fight it out, Canucks are pacifists.



Too bad we&#039;re knee deep in massive bloodshed and war-mongering, or we could invade Canada.

For their wisdom and water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pasta: They can&#8217;t fight it out, Canucks are pacifists.</p>
<p>Too bad we&#8217;re knee deep in massive bloodshed and war-mongering, or we could invade Canada.</p>
<p>For their wisdom and water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastafarian</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11564</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastafarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11564</guid>
		<description>We should let California, and Canada fight it out. Of course you&#039;d have to count out the FRENCH Canadians.

Sorry. I didn&#039;t have enough time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should let California, and Canada fight it out. Of course you&#8217;d have to count out the FRENCH Canadians.</p>
<p>Sorry. I didn&#8217;t have enough time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott F.</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11560</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11560</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, I was wrong!  There are MORE people in the state of California than in the entire nation of Canada.  

Pop of California: 36,553,215 
Pop of Canada: 33,394,000

Kinda amazing we manage to get water to all those people isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, I was wrong!  There are MORE people in the state of California than in the entire nation of Canada.  </p>
<p>Pop of California: 36,553,215<br />
Pop of Canada: 33,394,000</p>
<p>Kinda amazing we manage to get water to all those people isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott F.</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11559</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11559</guid>
		<description>Yeah Blue - we haven&#039;t had ANY water legislation in the US until recently!

It&#039;s not like they pissed off most of the country by making it impossible to buy anything but low-flow toilets decades ago.  It&#039;s not like we&#039;ve got one of the most efficient water purification and reclamation systems in the world (little hint, you might ask those Canadian engineers who&#039;s system they modeled theirs after).

Before you go ripping into the U.S., take a minute to engage the logic centers of your brain.  We are the 3rd largest nation in land area in the world, after Russia and Canada.  We are third in population after China and India.  There are 300 million people in the U.S., Canada has 33,394,000.  So your country is bigger than ours, and you have 1/10th the people.  There are nearly as many people in the state of California alone.

You have massive fresh water lakes, pure glaciers, and tons of fresh water rivers.  We have no glaciers outside of Alaska.  Also, many of our water-rich states are required to subsidize states that are largely inhospitable desert.  You think they produce much water in Arizona, Utah, Texas, New Mexico, ect.?  Canada doesn&#039;t have that problem.  

Moral of all this?  We provide far more people with water with fewer resources.  I&#039;d call that efficiency, not gluttony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Blue &#8211; we haven&#8217;t had ANY water legislation in the US until recently!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like they pissed off most of the country by making it impossible to buy anything but low-flow toilets decades ago.  It&#8217;s not like we&#8217;ve got one of the most efficient water purification and reclamation systems in the world (little hint, you might ask those Canadian engineers who&#8217;s system they modeled theirs after).</p>
<p>Before you go ripping into the U.S., take a minute to engage the logic centers of your brain.  We are the 3rd largest nation in land area in the world, after Russia and Canada.  We are third in population after China and India.  There are 300 million people in the U.S., Canada has 33,394,000.  So your country is bigger than ours, and you have 1/10th the people.  There are nearly as many people in the state of California alone.</p>
<p>You have massive fresh water lakes, pure glaciers, and tons of fresh water rivers.  We have no glaciers outside of Alaska.  Also, many of our water-rich states are required to subsidize states that are largely inhospitable desert.  You think they produce much water in Arizona, Utah, Texas, New Mexico, ect.?  Canada doesn&#8217;t have that problem.  </p>
<p>Moral of all this?  We provide far more people with water with fewer resources.  I&#8217;d call that efficiency, not gluttony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Scowl</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11551</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Scowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11551</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m sorry if you think there is only one meaning to the word funny.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No need to apologize. You qualify for more than one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m sorry if you think there is only one meaning to the word funny.</p></blockquote>
<p>No need to apologize. You qualify for more than one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueGold</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11550</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueGold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11550</guid>
		<description>If your country has such good hold on it&#039;s water problem, why is your government begging Canada to export it&#039;s water to you when we have our own water problems?

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060101/export_water_060101/20060101?hub=Canada

Minnow&amp;D---

Yes your government has RECENTLY started doing something about your water crisis. In reality they should have done something about it years ago. You know, before it became a crisis. And as you may have water protection in place, it has come very late and is not as strong as it should be. Believe it or not, in this area, the states has much room for improvement.

Simon&amp;Pastafarian

I&#039;m sorry if you think there is only one meaning to the word funny. Very, very sorry.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your country has such good hold on it&#8217;s water problem, why is your government begging Canada to export it&#8217;s water to you when we have our own water problems?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060101/export_water_060101/20060101?hub=Canada" rel="nofollow">http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060101/export_water_060101/20060101?hub=Canada</a></p>
<p>Minnow&amp;D&#8212;</p>
<p>Yes your government has RECENTLY started doing something about your water crisis. In reality they should have done something about it years ago. You know, before it became a crisis. And as you may have water protection in place, it has come very late and is not as strong as it should be. Believe it or not, in this area, the states has much room for improvement.</p>
<p>Simon&amp;Pastafarian</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if you think there is only one meaning to the word funny. Very, very sorry.<br />
<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/funny" rel="nofollow">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/funny</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastafarian</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11546</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastafarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11546</guid>
		<description>A priest, a rabbi, and a midget walk into a bar. The midget says...

...&quot;You know what is funny? There seems to be nothing in place in the states for long-term water conservation!&quot;


You&#039;re right! That is funny! I guess it&#039;s gotta be in the right context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A priest, a rabbi, and a midget walk into a bar. The midget says&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8221;You know what is funny? There seems to be nothing in place in the states for long-term water conservation!&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right! That is funny! I guess it&#8217;s gotta be in the right context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D---</title>
		<link>http://deceiver.com/2008/10/06/new-starbucks-drip/comment-page-1/#comment-11545</link>
		<dc:creator>D---</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deceiver.com/?p=3433#comment-11545</guid>
		<description>BlueGold - I will make the assumption that you have never been to Colorado, California, Nevada, Arizona or New Mexico. All those states have water plans and San Diego California is fast tracking a desalination plant (California&#039;s second I believe)

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20080806-2108-bn06desal.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlueGold &#8211; I will make the assumption that you have never been to Colorado, California, Nevada, Arizona or New Mexico. All those states have water plans and San Diego California is fast tracking a desalination plant (California&#8217;s second I believe)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20080806-2108-bn06desal.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20080806-2108-bn06desal.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
