Last week we told you about Travis Barker breaking his 25-year vegetarian pledge to help speed the healing of his serious burns. And how the same week he announced it, his ex-wife and reality-show costar Shanna did this PETA ad:
AW-kward! And now faithful Deceiver reader NagelLadyKatie has dug up something from Moakler’s past that might be relevant to the whole thing:
Hey, Shanna! What’s that? Er, over your shoulders. I don’t know when this picture was taken, but I do know that thing is still dead.
(Pic stolen from IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com, which stole it from Stuff Magazine)
Related posts:
- Shanna Moakler: Is This What A Vegetarian Looks Like? Well, this is brazen. (Or maybe I mean braisin’?) Last...
- Shanna Moakler: Paragon of Morality On Tuesday, Miss California Carrie Prejean was allowed to keep...
- Shanna Moakler Keeps on Moaklin’ The paragon of morality took to the airwaves this morning,...
- PETA Founder Wishes PETA Could Be Less Controversial Ingrid Newkirk sat down with Montel Williams yesterday to chat...
- PETA Protests Jay Leno Over McDonald’s Sponsorship PETA is just aghast that “The Jay Leno Show” has...













And you would think that Travis Barker’s experience after the accident and the fact that he has to eat meat to properly recover would prompt her to cut all ties with PETA.
Nice dead animal, too, Shanna.
Well, I’d bet Shanna is photoshopped so why not the fur? That’d be my defense.
It’s ok they were given to her.
Most of PETA’s membership suffer from acute anal-retentiveness. That condition, if gone untreated, will degenerate to a form of obsessive-compulsive disorder which manifests itself in excessive pet collecting and that usually leads to a guest appearance on Animal Planet and to having one’s house torn down in order to rid the neighborhood of the stench of cat piss. The only cure I know of is to force feed the afflicted Big Macs.
at a cockfight.
Not photoshopped. The fur was there for some homeless guy. She was just looking sexy in it to help him in his hour of need. After the photo shoot, she went by KFC to hook him up.
hahaha queen bee! and i love how deceiver says my AOL name, i like my screen name so it works for me lol i just think it was uh.. odd timing? kind of? yeah.
The fur coat was there for some homeless guy? How do we know it wasn’t made out of some homeless guy hmmmmmm? I’ve heard about people from California. They’re fucking weirdos.
Is that a closet full of Furs behind her too? She couldn’t decide which cluster of dead animals to wear?
Bah! I’m sure that fur coat was one that was donated by a newly-converted myrmidon to be given to a goatherder in a third-world country. They simply borrowed the coat for a few minutes before sending it on its way.
“But I didn’t know those furs came from actual animals!”–The Pammy Anderson Defense
people can change their views
eating some meat is healthier than eating none. poor kids.
Another flat-falling attempt to discredit the animal rights movement.
The original post says so itself: “We don’t know when the photo was taken”.
The profile for Moakler on Stuff’s website appears to have been added in 2005. Not able to find anything about when she went veg, but the fact that the pic is nearly 4 years old does cast some doubt on this little exposé, don’t you think?
Not really. That thing is still dead.
Simon Scowl, again, you seem to be missing the point. Guess what? I wore leather shoes & carried leather handbags 4 years ago!!! *gasp*
If you dug up a pic of me with a leather purse, I would not be a hypocrite TODAY, because I don’t own one TODAY.
I’m saying that this little ball of mud is “inconclusive” at best.
Fascinating.
Ohhhh Simon Scowl, is that all you’ve got?
So far you haven’t replied to any of my comments with anything but a sarcastic, yet empty little one or two word comment.
Why waste your time if you have nothing to add?
It’s all that’s necessary.
Simon Scowl – “It’s all that’s necessary” … for what, exactly?
Don’t worry about it.
Wow. Your behavior is really strange, Simon Scowl.
But you know what all of this REALLY makes me think? Man! I really want to head over to the Deceiver store & buy some merch! Beyond any petty bickering, this is just bafflingly stupid business practice. (And this *is* a business, is it not?)
Well, guess what? Congratulations, you’ve managed to turn me away. I’m not one of those sado-masochists who gets on the internet because I enjoy arguing with weirdos.
I predict a “page not found” message for deceiver.com in about 6 months! LOL
Buh-bye now!
(A dollar says Scowl either deletes this comment or won’t be able to shop himself from giving it some psycho reply.)
You’re welcome.
Oh well.
I’m sorry everyone for Simon’s rudeness – he can be a little testy when he stays up too late. You really shouldn’t encourage him… Lord knows nothing I say gets through that thick little skull of his!
Well played, sir.
I fully support PETA.
(P)eople (E)ating (T)asty (A)nimals.
Hmmm, I understand that the point of the website is to uncover hypocrites, but this website seems to do nothing more for vegetarianism than tabloids do for the good of humankind. Maybe the celebrity indulgence is it’s motive, but I think it is important to focus on what people do and can do for ethics/animals/planet etc. rather than what they don’t. Playing the game of “who can be the strictest” is not what vegetarianism or the animal rights movement (which includes meat eaters) is about, it’s about living your life in a manner that is as compassionate as possible. That being said, I understand the disappointment in seeing someone you admire not being true to their cause…it should make you question their motives, but it shouldn’t make you question the good work done by so many others in the realm of animal rights.
Some douchebag wrote:
“Playing the game of “who can be the strictest” is not what vegetarianism or the animal rights movement (which includes meat eaters) is about.”
What? The animal rights movement includes meat eaters? (Other than Pam Anderson?) I’m not buying that load of bull. I think the point is that hardly anyone practices what PETA preaches. Not even the “enlightened” famous drones who get famous claiming to be holier than thou.
Someone really should point out that owning a dog will contribute to “animal cruelty”. Most dogs eat a diet of at least 50% meat, and the dog ain’t catching that meat by itself.
And putting a dog on a vegetarian diet would also be cruel.
So doesn’t that make owning dogs or cats a paradox for vegetarians?
Hi. I’m Mimi J, against PETA. (and for good health)
There are so many good reasons to eat meat, but for me, the wellbeing of my red blood cell count is most important.
I want to be healthy and also for people to understand that when I say no to vegetarianism, I’m saying no to iron-deficiency and anaemia.
We (the doctor and I) talk about iron intake, and she says “You wouldn’t stop eating vegetables, would you? Well then let’s not give up any necessary food group.”
I make the connection between meat products, which contain iron and protein, and all the other food groups that are also necessary to be healthy.
I hope you’ll make the same connection.
I’m Mimi J, and I need iron to live. (and hey, so do you.)