Well, that didn’t take long.
Desperate to salvage her — ahem — kredibility, after we reported that she’s not really a PETA-friendly anti-fur animal rights junkie, Khloe Kardashian’s handlers have her trying to wipe the “oops” off of her face — with a closet full of leather.
The always funny Brit satirists at Anorak have named Khloe “PETA’s dumb animal of the month.” And Perez Hilton got in on the act yesterday. He was a little late to the dance, but we appreciate the hat-tip. (What? Perez ripped us off and didn’t even drop a link? Shocker…)
Anyway, Khlo-Khlo claims in her blog that “I have changed my ways.” Apparently she wore fur in March, and then decided not to wear fur in December. Right around the time PETA offered to put her giant naked butt on a Hollywood billboard.
Hmmmm…
Anyone want to bet me $10 that the little famewhore goes right back to fox jackets and mink stoles the minute the billboard comes down? It’s not like she doesn’t own her own furs… Let’s see… Here’s a coat from last January. Here’s a stole from last December. Paparazzi can’t fire up Photoshop without tripping over a shot of Khloe in dead animals.
I just love some of the comments from readers of Khloe’s little blog konfession:
- “Sorry Khloe, this was just a cheap publicity stunt. Just admit to it. You wanted to get naked and get free press.!!”
-
“Why are you such a liar? You never said this when you first posted about PETA and the ad. Why don’t you just say that you wanted some press? The Kardashians don’t turn down a thing! Uggggh I hate PETA for approaching you to do this. You are a fraud.”
-
“Kardashians will do anything for some press or to get their names out there. You are no different, kill the innocent act!”
-
“I agree with the people stating that you just did this as a publicity stunt! I’m quite certain that you just wanted to get naked in front of the camera like your sister … What’s next, a sex tape? By the way, what exactly are any of the Kardashians famous for? It’s not talent, that’s for sure. The only true celebrity in your family is Bruce Jenner.”
As we reported last week, Khloe’s press statement was about being fashionable “without killing animals.” I guess leather boots, jackets, and handbags don’t count. The photo above is just nine days old. And these photos are from two days ago. Here’s one I like:
I don’t know which biker gang made the boots, but the purse is a $1,650 Jimmy Choo number. Yep — nothing but the finest cow skin for this phony PETA camera-magnet.
Choo makes a version of this bag with real snake-skin trim. I’m a little surprised Khloe didn’t splurge for it.
Related posts:
- Khloe Kardashian Sells a Whole Farm’s Worth of Leather in Her Boutique The Oversneer has been having such fun mocking Khloe Kardashian...
- Khloe Kardashian Kills Kopious Kritters for her Klothing So it looks like Khloe Kardashian is PETA’s latest anti-fur...
- Khloe Kardashian Would Rather Wear Fur. Sorry, PETA. I just don’t think PETA is trying very hard. After...
Maybe she should give her furs to the cold people in Africa.
Riiiight, that’s gonna happen.
Don’t worry…Perez steals from Michael K. at DListed all the time.
What’s under that white shirt of hers? A friggin’ pumpkin?! Next time instead of spending $2,000 on a purse, buy a treadmill instead. No wonder they’re always in stretch pants. Nothing else fits.
Good God is that her ass???
broxie, it’s her ass or she’s smuggling illegals in that thing.
Man
What a fat ass!
C’mon girl… only primitives find a big ole fat ass attractive lol
I have a big butt too but at least I’m somewhat in proportion. Geez, Sir Mix-A-Lot must stalk her.
the comments LOLOL omg! hilarious. but not like this wasn’t expected. just another PETA tart not knowing what she got herself into.
Wait, though. Seriously. That’s actually her ass?
Sweet Jesus, I hope that ass was photoshopped.