Well, that didn’t take long.

Desperate to salvage her — ahem — kredibility, after we reported that she’s not really a PETA-friendly anti-fur animal rights junkie, Khloe Kardashian’s handlers have her trying to wipe the “oops” off of her face — with a closet full of leather.

The always funny Brit satirists at Anorak have named Khloe “PETA’s dumb animal of the month.” And Perez Hilton got in on the act yesterday. He was a little late to the dance, but we appreciate the hat-tip. (What? Perez ripped us off and didn’t even drop a link? Shocker…)

Anyway, Khlo-Khlo claims in her blog that “I have changed my ways.” Apparently she wore fur in March, and then decided not to wear fur in December. Right around the time PETA offered to put her giant naked butt on a Hollywood billboard.

Hmmmm…

Anyone want to bet me $10 that the little famewhore goes right back to fox jackets and mink stoles the minute the billboard comes down? It’s not like she doesn’t own her own furs… Let’s see… Here’s a coat from last January. Here’s a stole from last December. Paparazzi can’t fire up Photoshop without tripping over a shot of Khloe in dead animals.

I just love some of the comments from readers of Khloe’s little blog konfession:

• “Sorry Khloe, this was just a cheap publicity stunt. Just admit to it. You wanted to get naked and get free press.!!”

• “Why are you such a liar? You never said this when you first posted about PETA and the ad. Why don’t you just say that you wanted some press? The Kardashians don’t turn down a thing! Uggggh I hate PETA for approaching you to do this. You are a fraud.”

• “Kardashians will do anything for some press or to get their names out there. You are no different, kill the innocent act!”

• “I agree with the people stating that you just did this as a publicity stunt! I’m quite certain that you just wanted to get naked in front of the camera like your sister … What’s next, a sex tape? By the way, what exactly are any of the Kardashians famous for? It’s not talent, that’s for sure. The only true celebrity in your family is Bruce Jenner.”

As we reported last week, Khloe’s press statement was about being fashionable “without killing animals.” I guess leather boots, jackets, and handbags don’t count. The photo above is just nine days old. And these photos are from two days ago. Here’s one I like:

I don’t know which biker gang made the boots, but the purse is a $1,650 Jimmy Choo number. Yep — nothing but the finest cow skin for this phony PETA camera-magnet.

Choo makes a version of this bag with real snake-skin trim. I’m a little surprised Khloe didn’t splurge for it.

Related posts:

• The Inkredible Shrinking Khloe Kardashian Filling the void vacated by Jennifer Love Hewitt and her...
• Oprah. Fur. Leather. (Thankfully, It’s Not What You Think.) Welcome Farkers. Look around! We’ve got lots more lunacy. When...
• Khloe Kardashian Throws Down With Donald Trump Granted, I haven’t watched The Apprentice since college, but my...
• Angelina Adopts Leather We’ve been through this before: PETA attacks fur wearers...