Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
06
Jan
09

Gamers to PETA: “Ethical? You’re doing it wrong.”

UPDATE: PETA responds to the controversy in EDGE, saying that Fable II’s chicken-kicking “is done in a light-hearted manner. I don’t think anyone’s going to go out and start kicking chickens in their yard because of this game.” (Maybe no one will go vegetarian either.)

Wired notes today that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals — did ya ever notice that the “e” for “ethical,” is the only lower-case letter in their Logo? — anyway, PETA has picked a Video Game of the Year.

It’s Fable II, which you XBOX maniacs already know well.

True, eating meat in this game makes you slovenly and portly, and chomping on vegetables makes you lean and quick.

But …. erm, … PETA? It’s a video game. There are no real vegetarians in it. It’s all (*whispered*) imaginary!

Last year Simon blogged about how Mothers Against Drunk Driving was all upset over Grand Theft Auto IV because the game’s characters could drive drunk:

“[W]hen you’re sitting at home pretending to drive drunk in a video game, you’re not out driving drunk. You probably haven’t even left the house for days. You are a menace to nobody but yourself.”

Same deal here.

And besides, if this is “the most animal-friendly video game of the year,” maybe PETA should let that award gather dust for awhile.

In Fable II one of your more interesting weaponry options is a sort of helmet-mounted bottle rocket thingy. Which you strap to the head of your trusty dog, and let fly. Real animal-friendly.

And then there’s the XOBX “Chicken Kickin’” promotion. Did PETA miss this one? As part of the game’s pre-launch hype, players could collect Fable II “gold” by playing an online flash game in which they would — literally — kick a chicken for points.

I’m not making this up. Really. Cinema Blend also notes that killing rabbits is another way to earn points in Fable II.

In fact, the original “Fable” game had a sort of bonus round that consisted of nothing but soccer-kicking future KFC drumsticks all over the magic kingdom of “Dorks Who Can Afford Games Like Fable And Fable II.”

YouTube Preview Image

And the mini-game-within-a-game is back in Fable II. Or so I’ve heard. Really — I’m not a dork.

Moral of the story? We already know that helping defenseless puppies to assume room temperature is a PETA-sanctioned activity. Now punting poultry is also apparently “ethical.”

At least now I know why the “e” is lower-case.

UPDATE: The Escapist questions the value of vegetarian virtue in video-game characters: “My [Fable II] character was grossly overweight and a serial murderer. He ate meat pies by the handful, and killed the grocer who sold the celery … In the end, though, it didn’t really matter (outside of the realm of cosmetics) that my character ate meat because being evil wasn’t a bad thing to him, and Fable 2 doesn’t really punish you for being bad. Or liking steaks.”

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

18 Responses to “Gamers to PETA: “Ethical? You’re doing it wrong.””


  1. 1 Kristine Jan 6th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    I think this all depends on what your definition of is is. However, I do dare this game to use this endorsement in its advertising.

  2. 2 Habanada Jan 6th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    Hmm, never noticed that before–henceforth I shall always call them PeTA. Because P”e”TA is too cumbersome.

    Anyway, maybe PeTA just gets so excited every time something even remotely touches on their dogma that they just pounce and go, “SEE? SEE? WE’RE RIGHT!” Lucky for them, they just blow off the consequences when the world walks up and says, “Ah, no, you’re wrong.”

  3. 3 WUD Jan 6th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    If they were simply happy with the fact that Fable II portrayed vegetable consumption in a positive light, then they could have patted them on the back verbally and left it at that. I mean, we all know PeTA can work a press release. But noooo they’re still too busy trying to get as much exposure as possible, and what better way than to dish out BS awards to make the media perk up its ugly oversized bobblehead. And it worked!

  4. 4 FiniteJest Jan 6th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Actually, I haven’t found a single weapon in Fable 2 that involves strapping things to your dog’s head…and believe me, the nerd in me would have sought it out and FOUND IT hardcore. If you’re referring to the picture posted, that’s actually a Hobbe, and it’s a suicidal type of bad creature that runs at you with dynamite strapped to its back to blow you to kingdom come. Or Fable 3, I suppose.

  5. 5 KFC Lover Jan 6th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    I wonder if PeTA would love this game even more if they offered features like eating ice cream made from human breast milk. Or if they had mini games such as toss bombs, fake blood or flour on anyone seen consuming anything resembling an animal product.

  6. 6 Chronic Malanga Jan 6th, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    PeTA will do anything to pretend they have relevance, won’t they?

  7. 7 Christina X Jan 7th, 2009 at 1:08 am

    If that’s what PETA does to “motivate” vegetarianism, that’s pretty shallow. If PETA wants my respect, instead of basing why you should be a vegetarian on pop culture and shock value, they should at least try to make it a little bit more about animals, and a little bit less about hype.

  8. 8 Habanada Jan 7th, 2009 at 10:20 am

    That update made me laugh until I cried! Virtual chicken kicking is light-hearted entertainment? Sometime they’re going to have to pull that misplaced “e” out of their name. Oh, wait, you know what, I bet they don’t know what “ethical” means. That’s what it is. They wanted to call themselves PTA, but it already was in use, so they said, “Quick, find a word that starts with E!” They would’ve been better off chosing “egotistical.”

  9. 9 Fortunate Son Jan 7th, 2009 at 11:20 am

    It has occurred to me that even writing comments on Peta articles helps them further their goals and raise money, so henceforth I will be ignoring Peta completely. I suggest everyone do the same.

  10. 10 phoenix Jan 7th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    FS, I disagree with you-

    There are still tons of folks who think PeTA is actually a good organization. They donate money to them because they love their pets. The more folks who voice outrage over their hypocritical, self-serving B.S., the better.

    When a media machine like PeTA is working so hard to convince the world they’re worth paying attention to, the rest of us need to work hard to point out their flaws. They’re too big and established to try the “ignore them and they’ll go away” technique.

  11. 11 jenn Jan 7th, 2009 at 11:43 am

    A cosmetics company I deal with now gives a percentage of their sales to PETA. I have contacted their marketing and promotions department a few times regarding this. Finally I sent some links to Deceiver. Someone from marketing then contacted me, said she had read the links and while nothing may change she has shared them with the office. Yay Deceiver!!

  12. 12 Pastafarian Jan 7th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    They’re right. I didn’t need some video game to tell me to kick chickens. Those damn things are running wild by the thousands in my neighborhood. Killing raccoons, people’s dogs, they even pecked the crap out of my neighbors cat. Hoards of the ravenous beasts. I won’t rest until they’re wiped out.

    Hey I’m eating a chicken sandwich right now! So you know I’m serious.

  13. 13 O2Si Jan 7th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    Interesting stuff. PeTA seems to be ignoring the food vendors in Fable 2 that sell “Crunchy chicks” that you buy and bite live. Perhaps those are eaten live in a light hearted manner too.

  14. 14 StrawberryGirl Jan 7th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    You’d think PETA would back “Veggie Tales,” but I guess it’s a little too Christian for them.

  15. 15 Habanada Jan 7th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    Nah, SG–Veggie Tales teaches children NOT to eat their vegetables. I mean, who wants to take a big bite out of Bob the Tomato? After four or five videos, I’m ready to become a total meatatarian! Save Larry–eat chickens!

  16. 16 MC Mom Jan 8th, 2009 at 11:30 am

    Maybe PETA should help create a new set of children’s videos and call it ‘Pork Chop Tales.’ Then kids would get attached to, say, Bob the filet mignon and Luigi the meatball and want to eat veggies instead.

    Hey, it makes as much sense as giving props to a video game where you kick chickens…

  17. 17 Habanada Jan 9th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    Okay, MC Mom, here’s the plan: we’ll pitch the idea to PeTA and get them to kidnap a few really good 3D animators for us. Then we’ll make a series of episodes dedicated to humans’ reign of terror over the t-bones, our sadistic treatment of salami, our cruelty to calamari. Some dialogue we can use: “OH DEAR LORD HELP!!! DON’T EAT ME! NO!” and “TEDDY T-BONE! NO!!!! BARBARIANS!!! *inconsolable weeping*”

    We’ll probably get bashed on Deceiver a couple weeks after the premier–I mean, I know I will, ’cause I love my meats and dairy–but some PeTA drone must make us rich in the process, somehow!!

  18. 18 Albatoss Aug 13th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    PETA please quit leaving your brains in the ditch before you go out to be stupid

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




January 2009
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • turkeyguy: Gee, Meghan, nice twits.
    • Pearce: Deceiver ate my reply. It involved welfare fraud...
    • Pearce: CMS, you can throw all the stones you’d...
    • Pearce: Yeah…I had a pitbull when I lived in a...
    • James Woods: you guys gotta post his other picture from...
    • blue: I just read an article where Rielle claims,...
    • Stan: What no spread eagle shot? What a gyp!
    • Hmmm...: D– “Forgot she wasn’t wearing pants?...
    • skippy: I followed the link to the Rielle pictures...
    • skippy: I was at Home Depot yesterday and saw her on the...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella