Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
12
Jan
09

Subprime mortgage billionaires still “should be shot”

subprime-shark

Remember the founders of the Center for Responsible Lending? Those subprime-mortgage billionaires Herb and Marion Sandler, the “people who should be shot”?

The “responsible” Sandlers got rich selling out the little guy, then pressured NBC into editing the online archive of a “Saturday Night Live” sketch that body-slammed their profiteering with a subtitle suggesting that, well … they “should be shot.” NBC has apparently also removed references to the Sandlers from the sketch as it airs in SNL reruns. You know — those Sandlers. The ones who should be shot.

Well, apparently the Sandlers (who, by the way, totally should be shot) weren’t done throwing their weight around.

The New York Times has quietly “corrected” the headline of its page-A1 Christmas Day feature on the Sandlers. The story was originally called “Once trusted mortgage pioneers, now pariahs.” (It’s still intact at the Times‘ European affiliate paper, the International Herald Tribune.) But in New York, “pariahs” has been changed to “scrutinized.”

The Times dissembles explains:

A headline on Dec. 25 with an article about Herbert and Marion Sandler, bankers and philanthropists whose World Savings Bank originated a type of adjustable-rate mortgage called Pick-a-Pay that has led to many foreclosures as the real estate market and the economy collapsed, described incorrectly the consequences to the Sandlers of the criminal and legal investigations of the practices of the bank, which they sold to Wachovia in 2006. As the article noted, the Sandlers were once trusted mortgage pioneers and now face scrutiny, but they are not “pariahs.”

ORLY?

pa⋅ri⋅ah
/pəˈraɪə/ [puh-rahy-uh]  –noun

  1. an outcast.
  2. any person or animal that is generally despised or avoided.
  3. (initial capital letter) a member of a low caste in southern India and Burma.

I’m not saying these loan sharks (who should be shot) are from India or Burma. But if they’re not pariahs, Oprah’s a size-six vegetarian Republican.

I’ve never heard of the Times correcting a page-A1 headline before. Factual errors, yes. But a headline? I’m sure it has nothing to do with the fact that Times Managing Editor Jill Abramson sits on the Journalism Advisory Board of ProPublica, a journalism “integrity” charity founded and bankrolled by Herb Sandler …

… who should be shot.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

12 Responses to “Subprime mortgage billionaires still “should be shot””


  1. 1 letinstar Jan 13th, 2009 at 12:03 am

    not only should these people be shot but they should also have their money invested with madoff….ugh…

  2. 2 Queen Bee Jan 13th, 2009 at 12:49 am

    No, they should have to live in poverty – like the people they screwed.

  3. 3 Queen Bee Jan 13th, 2009 at 12:51 am

    Oh, and maybe have their assets sold off to repay the people who lost their money. And then be jailed. They aren’t the only people who should have to pay for screwing the American investors.

  4. 4 Jrod Jan 13th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    Who knew the NY Times was bought and paid for…oh wait, EVERYONE knows that!

  5. 5 Aleric Jan 13th, 2009 at 9:43 am

    When they are done shooting them they need to turn the gun on Barney Frank and Chuck Schumer.

  6. 6 Rocco Lore Jan 13th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    The Sandlers are big George Soros supporters. Surprise anyone?

  7. 7 Lisa Jan 13th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    I don’t agree with what these people did, the lies they spew forth, or the preditory lending practices. However, no one should hear/see on tv – even as a joke – they should be shot.

    There are a lot worse out there and you never saw SNL making that kind of “joke”.

  8. 8 Pastafarian Jan 13th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    Hey remember when SNL was funny? Yeah neither do I.

  9. 9 MC Mom Jan 13th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    Holy cow, when you have billions (whether ill-gotten or not), you can buy anything. What a nice Christmas gift for the Sandlers. I wonder how the author of the article enjoyed having that word change shoved down his/her throat?

  10. 10 Rocko Jan 13th, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    The Times needs the money people! If only the Seattle Post Intelligencer and Chicago Tribune had written critical articles about the Sandlers then they could’ve gotten bought off as well.

  11. 11 California Dave Jan 14th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    SNL was funny…back in the days of Ackroyd – Belushi – Chase – Curtin et al.

  12. 12 Jon Feb 16th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    I wonder when the Sandlers will throw their weight in getting this post corrected? They never sold subprime mortgages…apparently you didn’t even read the NYT piece that you talk about.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




January 2009
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • CroppyBoy: With all due respect to the dead, Ms. Paltrow...
    • skippy: I think it’s acceptable to euthanize an...
    • skippy: Whenever a celebrity starts spouting off about...
    • skippy: This commercial has been irritating me, too....
    • bigmama: Eat less junk food and move more=best way to...
    • bigmama: I don’t care about Twilight so I have no...
    • Stan: They should put the used undies in a special pile...
    • Vince: South Carolina boy here, so I know my fried...
    • JollyGreenMidget: AllyKat, so right. If the PETArds value...
    • Tamishia: Unfortunately we have all witnessed many...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella