Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
04
Feb
09

Pam Anderson Poses With Puppy and Leather in New Ads

pam_vivienne_westwood_09

The ads for Vivienne Westwood’s spring line are out, and boy must PETA be pissed.

As you may remember from a few months ago, Pam Anderson signed a six-figure deal to star in the new marketing campaign — despite the fact that the designer is best known for her genius leatherworking.

So it should come as no surprise that a male model Viv’s husband Andreas Kronthaler is wearing what appears to be a leather tuxedo jacket (so versatile!) in the above ad’s background.

Not to mention the shoot made use of a dog, which is strictly verboten in the PETA gospel. (See also: PETA praising Britney Spears for not using elephants in her upcoming Circus tour.) That Great Dane didn’t sign a contract to be exploited for the sale of designer duds! How dare they objectify that glorious beast! Etc.

But chances are they won’t say a word. Pam and PETA are practically synonymous, and they’re not about to shoot themselves in the tit over a little leather. Right?

(Hat tip to reader Constance!)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

38 Responses to “Pam Anderson Poses With Puppy and Leather in New Ads”


  1. 1 Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg Feb 4th, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    Sweet Be-Jebus. Sign her up for the Anna Nicole Smith treatment…STAT!

  2. 2 Fortunate Son Feb 4th, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    Was watching a Katie Couric interview at the airport recently and a physician sitting next to me opined that Katie Couric was using anabolic steroids, specifically synthetic testosterone.

  3. 3 MC Mom Feb 4th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    Wow, I feel like I need a tetanus shot just *looking* at that picture. What are they trying to sell here, the glamorous life of people living on the street in Venice Beach?

    No comment on the whole PETA/Pam Anderson hypocrisy thing. I mean, what else is new?

  4. 4 Pastafarian Feb 4th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    So the ad is for the clothes they’re wearing? If it is yech!!!

    It looks like some douchey nightclub guy’s vision of what a post-apocalyptic world might look like. Sort of like an atomic bomb detonated over “Crobar”. PULL YOUR DAMN PANTS UP HIPPIE!!

  5. 5 Jrod Feb 4th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    I think I understand what standards are now…I’ll pass.

  6. 6 Chronic Malanga Feb 4th, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    I would protest the dog’s presence there only because it’s too classy for the likes of these people, despite the fact that it can lick its own butt. What the hell are they? An escort service in Thunderdome?

    And yeah, Pam is a hypocrite. Nothing new there, though it is fun pointing out each instance of her sad, pathetic, public hypocrisy and association with terrorists like PETA. It doesn’t get old. I wonder, assuming she can read, if she’s ever seen this web site.

  7. 7 bigmama Feb 4th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    The dog looks a hell of a lot better than any of the humans.

  8. 8 Pastafarian Feb 4th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    Is the pasty faced ghoul on the left Vivienne Westwood? Johnny Rotten should’ve saved us all a lot of trouble and killed her when he had the chance. They all look like characters from some bad (is there any other kind?) Rob Zombie movie.

  9. 9 Chicklet Feb 4th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    “Not to mention the shoot made use of a dog.”

    Which dog are you speaking of?

  10. 10 Anagram Feb 4th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    that looks more like a silk suit jacket than leather, either way it’s made from an animal product.

  11. 11 StrawberryGirl Feb 4th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    Whatever they’re selling, I don’t want it!

  12. 12 manda Feb 4th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Pastafarian–my thoughts exactly! Frightening!!!

  13. 13 Rocco Lore Feb 4th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    So is PETA planning to firebomb the company that Pam posed for?

  14. 14 Minnow Feb 4th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    Geeze, the allegory going on in this photo is overwhelming my senses.

    Is Pam the desiccated aloe plant?

    The gray muzzle dog with surgically altered ears?

    The work truck with a bed full of crap?

    The smelly gigolo?

    Or the hobo vampire?

    My head is spinning.

  15. 15 Habanada Feb 4th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    I am so confused as to what I’m supposed to want to buy after looking at this thing. Somebody fire the guy who came up with that. Sheesh. Granted, I don’t know if P.A. is trashier than the setting or not . . . it’s a close call . . .

  16. 16 Kristine Feb 4th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    Pasta got it right when he said Rob Zombie… I knew I was having flashbacks of people turning into fish *shudder*.

  17. 17 jlynn Feb 4th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    Makes sense to me, Pamela Anderson is one of the most recognizable walking leather corpses in Hollywood. She should have just posed nude for this ad.

  18. 18 Constance Feb 4th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    Well, good to know the Deceiver crew reads emails! :D

    I laughed so hard when I saw the ads come out this morning. The hobo chic look is back in? I too was very confused at what exactly was being sold? None of the garments, aside from that leather jacket, look worth trying on.

    Poor Pammy, all you can say when you look at her is haggard.

  19. 19 Anni Feb 4th, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    She’s hideous and desperate looking. Does anyone else see that, too? More and more, I think these women would look better without makeup at all. There’s so much, they’d be better off flaunting any “flaws” they might have.

  20. 20 visfxguy Feb 4th, 2009 at 10:20 pm

    How do you spell Pam Anderson? H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E.

    I’m going to go out and eat a big T-bone steak while anally electrocuting a mink just to punish her.

  21. 21 Jannah Feb 4th, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Boy, you guys said it!!

    And what demographic group are they trying to sell these clothes to? Over-the-hill Goths? Coney Island circus freaks? The undead? It boggles the mind!

  22. 22 letinstar Feb 4th, 2009 at 11:50 pm

    hep meds cost money…pammy needs money…especially since her looks are long gone and it appears the aging rockers don’t want her like they used to…

  23. 23 Les Paul Feb 5th, 2009 at 12:49 am

    Good grief!

  24. 24 rob Feb 5th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    The rough jungle of a west coast parking lot, indeed.

  25. 25 Jannah Feb 5th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    And Pammy needs lots of money since she began the construction of her self-designed mega-mansion recently. She’s probably lost a lot of bucks in that venture since it began and the economy slumped.

  26. 26 Sue Feb 6th, 2009 at 4:56 am

    God, she does look disgusting!

  27. 27 Beige Feb 6th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    Hee. They’re hobosexuals.

    And also: I bet Vivienne Westwood can’t even take a nap without someone crossing her arms and laying lilies on her chest. Because, DANG. It’s a good thing she’s got the duckies, or that bearded crash-test dummy next to her would bail, and then who’d make her Metamucil?

  28. 28 Jannah Feb 7th, 2009 at 9:26 pm

    Hahahaha, hobosexuals!!! X-D OK, I’m gonna have to steal that line. :-)

  29. 29 Matt Feb 9th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    ever heard of pleather? welcome to the 21st century f*cktard.

  30. 30 Holly Won't Feb 9th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    I have heard of pleather, actually. Have you heard of Vivienne Westwood?

  31. 31 Parley Feb 12th, 2009 at 12:38 am

    I would think PETA would also be upset that the Great Dane’s ears have been cropped.

  32. 32 Christina X Feb 12th, 2009 at 3:11 am

    I’m so tired of PETA letting this dumb bitch off the hook repeatedly but then criticizing people who have never even supported PETA once as if THEY owe them an apology.

    They will target people like Britney Spears who (to my information) has never campaigned for PETA as if there’s some unwritten f*cking contract between them, but let Pammy break another rule, it’s okay.

    But at least Pamela Anderson and PETA has something in common: that they’re both self-serving traitors. Pam Anderson is apparently willing to “exploit” animals or use them for her own vain purposes, and PETA is intrinsically one of the most two faced organizations I can think of.

  33. 33 Jade Mar 7th, 2009 at 2:44 am

    You know, I actually contactyed them to see if they would mention a word about this. I provided ample links about it- plenty of proof. I haven’t heard back after the intial ‘we need proof’ e-mail. They haven’t posted a damn thing about it.

  34. 34 Beige Mar 7th, 2009 at 8:14 am

    Jade, they’ll get back to you when they’ve dropped off the last load of puppies to be killed. First things first, you know.

  35. 35 Jason Nov 20th, 2009 at 7:52 am

    What a hideous photo… Whatever they are selling, I dont want it.

  1. 1 DECEIVER MADNESS Round 1: “Humane Society” vs. “Actress” | Deceiver.com Pingback on Mar 9th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
  2. 2 CelebFace: All the gossip, juicy rumors and scandals! Pingback on Apr 16th, 2009 at 11:01 am
  3. 3 Ungodly Rich Fashion Designer Condemns Consumerist Culture at Deceiver.com Pingback on Feb 22nd, 2010 at 3:11 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




February 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Kelli: There’s a difference between being...
    • bubbasmom: Courage and Michael Vick? In the same...
    • Fortunate_Son: Sidebar: Happy 46th Birthday, Rielle...
    • JollyGreenMidget: Oh, and thanks Deceiver for not leaving...
    • JollyGreenMidget: Anyone going to make a crack about him...
    • California Dave: Fried chicken is something I’ve...
    • Commander PopTart: Pearce, And round out that menu with a...
    • Pearce: Yeah, things that come in “tall”...
    • Pearce: Or you could go with the “lock yourself in...
    • Pearce: Someone should introduce her to fried Twinkies.
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella