Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
09
Feb
09

In Which a Reader Cogently Defends Ashley Judd

Letters, we get letters! The following is presented in full and without alteration:

from:   Shane Grogg <E-mail redacted>
to:   tips@deceiver.com
date:   Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:20 PM
subject:   are you a republican? must be…

Cuz after not bothering w/ your page for months, I click on it and what do I find? The usual Obama-bashing(letting terrorists run free-c’mon) and, of course,Ashley Judd is a bitch cuz she had the nerve to criticize your frigid goddess Palin.
is your site sponsered bt Foxnews?
btw-Perez Hilton and Dlisted have got all this s*** covered-you are useless.

wolf-blitzerThanks for the reminder about Ashley Judd’s ill-informed campaign against caribou preservation in Alaska, Shane! Since you bring it up, it sounds like another state is having a similar problem with their wolves:

Idaho Fish and Game officials say the state’s wolf population is moving south and getting into trouble.

Fish and Game Director Cal Groen told the Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee that Idaho’s estimated 824 wolves are impacting the state’s deer and elk population.

He says big game populations are decreasing by as much as 15 percent a year. Without the wolves, Idaho’s deer and elk herds would be increasing 7 percent a year.

Groen says the wolf packs have become overcrowded and wolves have begun to kill each other.

(Hat tip: QandO) Ya mean they’re not just big fluffy puppies? But don’t worry, Shane:

Federal Endangered Species Act protections were nearly lifted from the predators in the northern Rocky Mountains in January; the decision is currently under review by President Barack Obama’s administration.

State officials say Idaho needs to be able to manage the wolf population through hunting to protect the state’s big game animals.

Let’s hope Obama protects those innocent wolves from us mean ol’ humans… so they can kill each other instead.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

39 Responses to “In Which a Reader Cogently Defends Ashley Judd”


  1. 1 Fortunate Son Feb 9th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Just a headsup, Shane Edward Grogg is a spammer. By posting his message you are helping him sell Tshirts.

  2. 2 jlynn Feb 9th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    btw Shane- if Perez Hilton is posting about it, it’s only because he rips off other sites! That includes Dlisted!
    If you’d rather get your information from an overrated, celebrity a** kissing hypocrite, then by all means, go to his site. You can post all the stupid comments you want with the rest of the morons who don’t know how to type.
    FIRST!!!

  3. 3 Beige Feb 9th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    So…Shane checked the site and wrote in to tell you that he doesn’t usually check the site or write to you. Because you’re so irrelevant, he just had to tell you. And because you don’t suck Ashley Judd’s toes, you’re a hoodwearing fascist. Good to know.

  4. 4 bigmama Feb 9th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Ok, let’s have the wolves run free in Malibu or Hollywood. Let them snatch up a couple of those yip-yap rat-like dogs all those celebrities seem to carry and see how long before people living in those areas want them shot. And btw Shane, nature is a bitch. Try living out in the wilderness and see how long you last. There’s a reason our cavemen ancestors didn’t live much past thirty and there’s a reason why people criticize misinformed people like Ms. Judd.

  5. 5 angry army wife Feb 9th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    Seems like Shane would not mind it if the terrorists ran free. Where does Shane live? Hopefully they can be adopted by his city. And Shane, use spellcheck.

  6. 6 tammie Feb 9th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    He should live with the wolves
    in a wolf suit
    with a bull’s-eye on his back…

    I officially <3 Beige!

  7. 7 Joshua Feb 9th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    Scientific America recently wrote up some of the science and history of shooting wolves.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=palin-shooting-wolves

    And everyone KNOWS their sponsored by Fox News.

  8. 8 Rocco Lore Feb 9th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    I hope a wolf goes on to Shane Gregg’s property!

  9. 9 Minnow Feb 9th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Terrorists run free here?

  10. 10 Ed Feb 9th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    Seriously though, you shouldn’t have published his email address. You guys have (rightfully) gone after Perez Hilton for publishing personal information about someone he had a beef with.

    http://deceiver.com/2008/07/15/perez-hilton-lard-order/

    Just because he doesn’t agree with you doesn’t mean you can give people the information to flame him.

  11. 11 Beige Feb 9th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    You’ve never seen Tori Spelling shop, have you, Minnow?

  12. 12 Fortunate Son Feb 9th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    [Overboard. -- MGMT.]

  13. 13 Pastafarian Feb 9th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Whoa, don’t piss off FS. Talk about grabbing a tiger by the tail. Yikes.

  14. 14 angry army wife Feb 9th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    Dang, that is a lot of information. Remind me to stay on your good side. So what you are saying is that Shane is definitely he just who Obama campaigned to. :)

  15. 15 david Feb 9th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    i do agree with ed. you shouldnt have published his email address even though you dont agree with him. say what you want, but deceiver is the defender of all things republican and sarah palin. very fox news-esque and ill expect some slight snarky comment back from one of you but it is true. just saying.

  16. 16 Tuly Mars Feb 9th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    Not only does he not pay taxes, I am sure ‘Fan-Boy’ does not pay to use the images he steals.

  17. 17 Pastafarian Feb 9th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    That is not true david. Why for instance would saying Al Gore is a hypocrite for using 10 times, or whatever it is, power of the average American be something only a republican would say? Why is saying Ashley Judd is full of crap and the people she supports are wrong is something a republican would say?

    Some lefty types have said the same things about Penn & Teller, John Stossel etc. Some people are starting to see through that ridiculous accusation.

  18. 18 Katy Feb 9th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    Cuz nothing gets a point across eloquently like using chatspeak w/ unnecessary abbreviations.

  19. 19 Simon Scowl Feb 9th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    say what you want, but deceiver is the defender of all things republican and sarah palin.

    I humbly apologize for correcting misinformation.

    very fox news-esque and ill expect some slight snarky comment back from one of you but it is true.

    Glad to oblige.

  20. 20 Simon Scowl Feb 9th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    Seriously though, you shouldn’t have published his email address. You guys have (rightfully) gone after Perez Hilton for publishing personal information about someone he had a beef with.

    …and then complaining when his personal information was given out. That’s what that was about. But point taken.

  21. 21 D---- Feb 9th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    david – this site is about hypocrisy and not abour political views or do you actually believe if you have liberal views you cannot be a hypocrite?

  22. 22 Fortunate Son Feb 9th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    C’mon David, we crawled through every inch of Sarah Palin’s dirty laundry, including her business partner’s sealed divorce file record #3PA-07-01581CI, and her daughter’s fake Louis Vuitton purse:

    http://deceiver.com/2008/09/05/john-edwards-publicly-admits-hes-a-political-liability/

    http://deceiver.com/2008/10/22/wtf-is-piper-palin-doing-with-a-fake-lv-an-update-on-the-previous-post/

  23. 23 Fortunate Son Feb 9th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    And don’t forget “Ten signs Sarah Palin may be an Orthodox Jew”.

  24. 24 Minnow Feb 9th, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    So participate more here David.

    Most of the comments left here seem to be short and witty rather than long, drawn-out conservative manifestos. While many of the most vocal seem to fall on the conservative side, what unites us is the ability to laugh at ourselves and others, plus we all enjoy a well delivered snark.

    I know that I’m not the only one here who appreciates a reasoned argument that forces one to rethink their parameters.

    The only people who get shouted at are those who barge in loudly with a chip on their shoulder or those who can’t seem to reason in a straight line. You however, sound like you could hold up your own end of a debate.

    Take your shoes off and stay a’while.

  25. 25 fozzy Feb 9th, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    Minnow, no. Don’t ask him to participate more. Reading comments from someone with a broken shift key and poor punctuation is a pain.

  26. 26 Queen Bee Feb 9th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    “Minnow, no. Don’t ask him to participate more. Reading comments from someone with a broken shift key and poor punctuation is a pain.”
    Agreed. One of the things I love about this site is, even if we don’t always see eye to eye, almost everyone uses correct grammar, punctuation and doesn’t abbreviate every freakin lol wrd. I know this betrays my age, but I can’t stand that . I didn’t fully read the original email because that bull makes my head explode.
    Oh, OMG and WTF.

  27. 27 D--- Feb 9th, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    omg i didnt realise i waz on a sight with a bunch of grammer nazis

  28. 28 Habanada Feb 9th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    Don’t worry ;) The best Grammar Nazis (like me) don’t pick on people we like. Just idiots.

    David’s clearly a newbie. Expecting snarky comments from one of us? Try most of us . . . I can’t think of a single Deceiver regular who would accept that kind of nonsense, no matter where on the political scale we fall.

    It’s not Deceiver’s fault if the vast majority of practicing hypocrites are left-wingers. I’ll take a line Simon usually does and point to the tips@deceiver.com button . . . if you can find a conservative hypocrite, let’s get their buns up here!

  29. 29 winewife Feb 9th, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    Umm…am I the only one not having a problem with putting this nutjob’s email address up for all to see? I’m pretty sure he sent the email in the hopes that it would get published. I mean what else could be his motivation? To hurt their feelings? He could have commented at any point on any thread and communicated his feelings the way the rest of us do. But he chose to send hate mail instead. Well, more like mildly irritating mail but that’s beside the point. Doesn’t he sort of forfeit his rights at that point? I’m assuming no one was holding a gun to his head; he didn’t have to disclose his private info. Just sayin’.

    And ditto on the punctuation/spelling thing. It’s just rude and lazy to not make an effort. I fully embrace my “grammer nazi-ism”. ROFLMFAO.

  30. 30 Holly Won't Feb 10th, 2009 at 12:13 am

    It’s not Deceiver’s fault if the vast majority of practicing hypocrites are left-wingers.

    I’m sorry, but LOL. “Left-wingers” certainly don’t have a lock on hypocrisy. But with Democrats in control of Congress and the White House, you’re gonna be likely to see more posts about people of the liberal persuasion simply because that’s the party currently with all the power. When conservatives are behaving badly, we nail them to the wall too. Need proof? Brush up on the Sarah Palin archive.

  31. 31 Minnow Feb 10th, 2009 at 10:58 am

    Geeze, can’t a girl blow a little sunshine once in a while?

    You gotta admit we don’t see many cogent libs here.

  32. 32 Habanada Feb 10th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    I won’t debate on the legitimacy or non-legitimacy of the posts claiming Sarah for a hypocrite, but I will defend my position. I never said there are no conservative hypocrites and certainly didn’t mean to imply it. But it is true that most of the people who keep getting on Deceiver are liberals, which is resulting in Deceiver being labeled “conservative.”

    I don’t have a problem with liberals; I have lots of liberal friends and it doesn’t make any difference in our relationships. I do have a problem with them when they have a problem with me, and I don’t think it’s my political affiliation that has me seeing more liberals than conservatives saying one thing and doing another. Like I said before, I am eager to be corrected; find conserative deceivers and put them up.

  33. 33 Aleric Feb 10th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    Don’t you love people that have no concept of hunting or the cycle of life on this little blue ball we call the earth?

    I blame Al Gore.

  34. 34 MC Mom Feb 10th, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    I was about to disagree with you, Minnow, and call myself a cogent lib, but then I remembered that I’m not as liberal as I used to be. Or as cogent. I chalk both up to getting old.

  35. 35 ahabers Feb 11th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    After reading Shanes lukewarm (and frankly not very well written) hate mail I couldn’t wait to add Deceiver to my favorites. “Obama-bashing(letting terrorists run free-c’mon) and, of course,Ashley Judd is a bitch cuz she had the nerve to criticize your frigid goddess Palin.
    is your site sponsered bt Foxnews?” If someone that stupid hates you I’m going to love it here. Thanks!

  36. 36 Beige Feb 11th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    I also don’t get “frigid” vibes from Palin’s persona. Maybe it’s all the reproducin’ n’ whatnot. Or was Shane referring to the fact that she lives in Alaska? In that case, the word he was no doubt looking for was “Alaskan”. See? Wasn’t that hard.

  37. 37 Habanada Feb 12th, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Maybe that type of liberal writes her off as frigid because of her moral standards. I run into a lot of youngsters today who confuse being frigid with having some kind of ethical backbone. “What do you mean, you won’t drop into bed with me when we’ve only known each other a week?”

  38. 38 Pastafarian Feb 12th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    Where do you run into these youngsters again?

  39. 39 Simon Scowl Feb 12th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    Yeah, she’s got 5 kids, including one who’s less than a year old, so it’s obvious she never has sex.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




February 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Catharine: Ya know, I’m surprised PeTA...
    • David Maggard: Lets get it clear they feel animals are...
    • Pearce: fallingstar, I’m 6′, 125 lbs, and...
    • Mfrag: Sadly to me it looks like she had a stroke in that...
    • Hurricane: “Help me! I’m melting! I’m...
    • chrocs: “Rumor has it Chris Martin has become as...
    • Fortunate_Son: I suggest all his coworkers immediately...
    • Fortunate_Son: I hope she washed her hands and utensils...
    • demonterius: i food fried chicken
    • Fortunate_Son: I must say that Holly is a true industry...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella