Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
12
Feb
09

Rank Hypocrisy — Coming Up Next On ‘The Factor’

Can you believe Craig Kilborn used to have this show?

Craig freakin’ Kilborn?

Me neither.

Take that, Papa Bear.

Hat tip: PoliGazette

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

30 Responses to “Rank Hypocrisy — Coming Up Next On ‘The Factor’”


  1. 1 Pastafarian Feb 12th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    Love the irony of him making fun of someone else’s relevance.

  2. 2 Amy Feb 12th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    Hey, don’t knock the Daily Show. Who knew a short, crazy Jewish man could be so funny?

  3. 3 Beige Feb 12th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    Stewart is probably the most self-indulgent, obnoxious douchebag on any network, anywhere. Wait–is Keith Olbermann still alive?

  4. 4 kbug61 Feb 12th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    I was amused by Bill O. staunchly defending this “Constitutional Right to Privacey.” Does he realize that the Supreme Court first outlined this right in Roe v. Wade? That it does not actually exist constitutionally but for this landmark case? So Bill O. is pro-choice?

  5. 5 Aleric Feb 12th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    Of course, because a reporter with a microphone asking a senator a question is the same as a hundred papparazzi chasing down a movie star in an airport or out shopping.

  6. 6 Minnow Feb 12th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    “Stewart is probably the most self-indulgent, obnoxious douchebag on any network, anywhere. Wait–is Keith Olbermann still alive?”

    Okay, but Billy O runs a close third.

    Add Nancy Pelosi, Joy Behar, and Al Gore as numbers 4 through 6 on the dinner guest list and it’d be like dining al fresco in the ninth circle of hell.

    Oops, actually they all fall into the eighth circle if I remember the heirarchy right.

  7. 7 MC Mom Feb 12th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Yes, Beige, Keith O. is alive and well and obnoxious as ever on MSNBC and a useless segment on Sunday Night Football. One day my dream will come true and Cris Collinsworth will catch him mid-rant with a short left to the jaw.

    And Minnow, I’d better start praying more so I end up somewhere more like the 3rd or 4th circle rather than down there with those clowns.

  8. 8 Kaylee Feb 12th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Billy is a jacka**! Bill O’Rally and Nancy Grace are a match made in Hypocrisy H*ll.

  9. 9 Carlo Feb 12th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    That was a funny segment.

  10. 10 Beige Feb 12th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    I know Bill O’ Reilly is abrasive. But Joy Behar is, in the words of someone whose name I can’t recall, a “lipsticked manatee”.

  11. 11 bigmama Feb 12th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    I think to get a talk show on TV it’s required that you be a douchebag. Something in their contracts.

  12. 12 Rocko Feb 12th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    I was amused by Bill O. staunchly defending this “Constitutional Right to Privacey.” Does he realize that the Supreme Court first outlined this right in Roe v. Wade? That it does not actually exist constitutionally but for this landmark case? So Bill O. is pro-choice?

    Isn’t that something? A Constitutional right to privacy that’s not in the Constitution. It took the Supreme Court to find it. And without Google even. I mean, the Second Amendment clearly spells out the right of the citizen to own weapons but the Federal government, some states and the cities regularly pass laws that infringe on a right that is in the Constitution. What a topsy turvy world we live in.

    I never liked O’Reilly’s ambushes. I always thought they were bush league. Um, pun not intended. I suppose the difference is O’Reilly sees himself as a journalist but views the paparazzi as the equivalent of the guys who used to wash your windshield with dirty newspaper.

    I preferred the Daily Show with Craig Kilborn, it was funny. I actually stopped watching the show when Stewart took over.

  13. 13 all one word Feb 12th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    7 out of 11 comments calling out Jon Stewart instead of the focus of the post, Bill O’Reilly.
    Can Deceiever make posts about its own commentors?

  14. 14 Kristine Feb 12th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    I work as a journalist and had a high schooler e-mail me a few months back asking me if I thought reporters had the right to go to any measure to get a story (in a nutshell). My answer (in a nutshell) was that going after someone who has done/said something “wrong” is completely different than going after someone whose only crime is being famous (although, when they open their political mouths, they open themselves to the same scrutiny as other people making statements). Is whoever went out sans underwear or who hit whom really affecting my life? No. However, digging around for as much info as I can on a local fourth-grade teacher who got busted two days ago for prostitution serves the public.

    Therefore, the hypocrisy in this post does lie with Jon Stewart.

  15. 15 Simon Scowl Feb 12th, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    7 out of 11 comments calling out Jon Stewart instead of the focus of the post, Bill O’Reilly.
    Can Deceiever make posts about its own commentors?

    Maybe, if you could explain what you’re talking about.

  16. 16 Rocko Feb 12th, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    He’s* talking about his name “all one word” actually being three words, thus making himself a hypocrite. He wants you to write an article about him Simon.

    *change all “he’s” and “his” to “she’s” and “her” if OP is female.

  17. 17 Patrick of Atlantis Feb 13th, 2009 at 12:50 am

    I’ve O’Reilly’s show and I’ve seen Comedy Central and I’ve seen Olberman’s show. O’Reilly’s is better entertainment. He has nice looking women guests on the show quite frequently.

  18. 18 Tara Lynn Feb 13th, 2009 at 12:52 am

    I, too, am a journalist. And Kristine, you are SPOT ON.

    Watching Brittany shop for sunglasses? Irrelevant.

    Catching Al Gore in a 3-vehicle SUV entourage to a global-warming seminar while asking attendees to ride bikes or the bus to attend? Effectual.

    And, well, priceless.

    MasterCard.

  19. 19 Loop the Lup Feb 13th, 2009 at 2:41 am

    Aspiring comedians should learn at least this much from Jon Stewart:

    Saying something loudly doesn’t make it funny all on its own.

  20. 20 Anni Feb 13th, 2009 at 2:41 am

    Don’t knock Jon Stewart. One day, I’ll get to meet him and we’ll have some gorgeous children. I love him. ./swoon

  21. 21 Jannah Feb 13th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    Wow, that’s an insult to the gentle manatees, Beige! :-o

  22. 22 Beige Feb 13th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Jannah: I thought that too. But the physical resemblance is undeniable. Heh.

  23. 23 all one word Feb 13th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    Point I was trying for was that the focus of the story was Bill’s privacy v. ambush journalism credo, and then how the focus was shifted away from the hypocrisy to bash on Jon Stewart, and not even for being hypocritical (which plenty of clips will show he can be), but just for being Jon Stewert.

  24. 24 all one word Feb 13th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    and cuz I’m feeling petty “all one word” isn’t a hypocritical name/phrase. More like an oxymoron, or irony, or a paradox. Eh, semantics.

  25. 25 snapnhiss Feb 14th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    You linked to an article in The Onion, a well known spoof site. You realize that, don’t you?

  26. 26 Simon Scowl Feb 14th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    You linked to an article in The Onion, a well known spoof site. You realize that, don’t you?

    What, you didn’t think it was funny?

  27. 27 letinstar Feb 15th, 2009 at 12:46 am

    o’reilly and stewart are both equally obnoxious…

  28. 28 DR.FUNK Feb 15th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    Funny segment.Douche A slings douche at Douche B.
    BTW-There is no constitutionally protected RIGHT to privacy.Yeah I know…it’s been posted

  29. 29 kbug61 Feb 16th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    I should have clarified in my earlier post that the hypocrisy for me was not the difference between the paps and “ambush journalists,” but the fact that Bill O. was defending a right that, if you think about it real hard, doesn’t actually exist. Constitutionally speaking, your right to privacy doesn’t extend much further than your front door. Your garbage (literally and metaphorically), is public property once it leaves your private property per the first amendment. You, know the one that allows you to say what you want in a public forum and the press the right to call you on it. . . in a public forum. The truth is both shield and sword in libel and slander cases. Not libel or slander? Then it’s only words so suck it up. It is the price of being a public figure. There are many celebs who seem to be able to go relatively pap free by simply not living in L.A. and keeping their mouths shut (and wearing panties when they go out).

  30. 30 Ferd Feb 17th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    @Dr. FUNK! Great post. I will try to use that new phrase this week. “Douche A slings douche at Douche B”. Truly awesome! I had previously been unable to use douche that many times in a single small sentence. This has opened my mind to new possibilities in naming douchery!

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




February 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Aleric: Stupid is as stupid does.
    • the truth: Kelli Mar 16th, 2010 at 1:53 pm And yet, still...
    • Anonymous: Kelli Mar 16th, 2010 at 1:53 pm And yet, still...
    • turkeyguy: Gee, Meghan, nice twits.
    • Aussie Expat: You lot are truly pathetic…talk about...
    • Pearce: Deceiver ate my reply. It involved welfare fraud...
    • Pearce: CMS, you can throw all the stones you’d...
    • Pearce: Yeah…I had a pitbull when I lived in a...
    • James Woods: you guys gotta post his other picture from...
    • blue: I just read an article where Rielle claims,...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella