Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
12
Feb
09

Senator Judd Gregg Really Ain’t Representin’

During the snoozer of a Barackus Caesar Obamus speech in Peoria, Illinois this afternoon, CNN’s “crawl” flashed the news that Senator Judd Gregg had become the second nominee to withdraw from consideration as a potential Commerce Secretary. Which was kind of a buzzkill, since the President was trying to erect a kickstand under the listing idea that his stimulus plan will, you know, help inspire some actual commerce.

Gregg, of course, is a Republican. So it surprised no one when he cited policy differences as his reason for bailing on the Commerce Department job and sticking with life as a Senator. (Countless Commerce Department employees were heard breathing sighs of relief, since Gregg was best known for wanting their whole agency abolished.)

When the Associated Press asked Gregg to share the results of his soul-searching, this is what he came up with:

“For 30 years, I’ve been my own person in charge of my own views, and I guess I hadn’t really focused on the job of working for somebody else and carrying their views, and so this is basically where it came out.”

If I were an arrogant jackass, this is what I might call “a teachable moment.” You see, it’s a really, really good thing that Judd Gregg realized this deep truth about himself and decided to go back to the Senate, where his job has always been to work for somebody else and carry their views.

You know — his constituents? The people of New Hampshire? Memba’ them?

Not that this is a Republican thing or a Democrat thing, mind you. I just don’t think I’ve seen such a good “Exhibit A” for putting term limits inthe U.S. Constitution in a long, long time. Thanks to Deceiver reader Christopher for bringing it to our attention.

juddgregg

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

15 Responses to “Senator Judd Gregg Really Ain’t Representin’”


  1. 1 Catharine Feb 13th, 2009 at 12:54 am

    Haha you know they (Senators) all think that! He just accidentally let it slip

  2. 2 jennifer Feb 13th, 2009 at 1:04 am

    Well atleast he is sticking to his own party.

  3. 3 jenn Feb 13th, 2009 at 7:02 am

    I like that he is making an issue of the White House census power grab. Another embarrassing turn for Obama (and Rahm Emmanuel)

  4. 4 Sissy Willis Feb 13th, 2009 at 7:19 am

    Interesting point, but I took it somewhat differently, assuming Sen. Greg shares the views of his constituents. Don’t know whether that’s true, given the once proud red-state NH’s invasion from the south of blue men from Taxachusetts . . .

  5. 5 Beige Feb 13th, 2009 at 8:07 am

    This is depressing–not that he dropped off the list, but that his true views, when divulged, are what they are. This is also why I’m veering more and more toward libertarianism and less and less toward being a Republican. The Republicans have thrown their supporters under a series of buses lately, and this is just the latest example.

  6. 6 Hurricane Feb 13th, 2009 at 9:23 am

    Meh- poorly worded but his point is quite clear and not hypocritical.

  7. 7 Carlo Feb 13th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    I thought the big hypocrisy was when he agreed to the commerce secretary nomination even though he advocated its abolition. It should be abolished that is, unless he is there to correct things from the inside.

    Do the people of New Hampshire have a say-so on whether he can return to the Senate after effectively abdicating his seat?

  8. 8 Jannah Feb 13th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    I hear ya Beige!

  9. 9 Bruce Feb 13th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    “where his job has always been to work for somebody else and carry their views”

    The job of a Senator mostly entails raising money for re-election, and pretending to pay attention to his constituents.

    Of course now in Obamanation, the job entails pretending to reading “stimulus” bills and squandering 9 trillion (and counting) … and then giving his/her constituents 13$ a week!!

    I’m actually quite amazed Gregg didn’t take the job even when it became clear he was to to Obamas bumboy on fixing the census.

  10. 10 angry army wife Feb 13th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    I figured he quit because it came to light that he did pay his taxes and Obama decided he was not a good fit for his cabinet.

  11. 11 Minnow Feb 13th, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    Carlo wrote: “Do the people of New Hampshire have a say-so on whether he can return to the Senate after effectively abdicating his seat?”

    I don’t think so since it’s common practice not to tender your resignation until you get confirmation.

    That way you can still attend the prom, even if it’s not on the arm of the football captain.

  12. 12 Kristine Feb 15th, 2009 at 12:34 am

    I agree with Hurricane.

    What he should have said instead was the real reason he resigned… because Obama is taking over the census. http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/39553192.html

  13. 13 Ferd Feb 17th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    Amen to term limits! Both sides have too many people who just take our money and do nothing for it. That reminds me, Congresspeople should pay their own way, like they did back when the nation was founded. Might teach them the value of money.

    BTW, libertarian is not a great option. Look at the Modern Whigs instead.

  1. 1 Judd Gregg Withdraws as Commerce Nominee Pingback on Feb 13th, 2009 at 7:57 am
  2. 2 Publius Forum » Blog Archive » Whatdidhesayagain? Pingback on Feb 13th, 2009 at 9:01 am

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




February 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • tammie: Vince is right, we will fry anything. Even...
    • CroppyBoy: With all due respect to the dead, Ms. Paltrow...
    • skippy: I think it’s acceptable to euthanize an...
    • skippy: Whenever a celebrity starts spouting off about...
    • skippy: This commercial has been irritating me, too....
    • bigmama: Eat less junk food and move more=best way to...
    • bigmama: I don’t care about Twilight so I have no...
    • Stan: They should put the used undies in a special pile...
    • Vince: South Carolina boy here, so I know my fried...
    • JollyGreenMidget: AllyKat, so right. If the PETArds value...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella