Comments on: Chris Brown Is a Popular Fella, Ella, Ella, Eh, Eh, Eh

By: Nati

Nati — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:39:02 +0000

Beige, I wouldn’t attribute the never attempted (well, as far as we know) knockin’ of barbra’s head off to josh’s self-control. I think he was just afraid. Cause she’s scary, u know…even seeing her onscreen gives me the chills. I can’t imagine what it might be like to be face to face with her…on a daily basis. and to have her as a family member…hell, i’d be sitting on the door step of the nearest nuthouse begging to be commited. if i were josh brolin. but i’m not. thank god. what an asshole…he was basically playing himself in planet terror.

By: Beige

Beige — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:35:48 +0000

@Nati: Anyone who can be within slapping distance of Babs, and NOT knock her head off, has enough control going on to keep his mitts off Diane Lane. I’m just sayin’.

By: Nati

Nati — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:51:12 +0000

in response to josh brolin comments: the man who has barbra streisand for a stepmom cannot be held accountable for his actions. just put him in 1 of those nice quiet places where nurses are known to be generous with detomidine. i’m even willing to cough up my taxpayer money to keep him locked up indefinitely in a gov’t facility if stepmommy dearest doesn’t shell out the $$$ for a private clinic

By: Ferd

Ferd — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:33:26 +0000

@Scott F. – Preach it, brother! That was an awesome post.

@Letinstar – You’re right. Why didn’t the media push the Brolin/Lane thing? Josh Brolin is a talentless left-wing hack who was doing things the media liked (W. The Movie, Milk) so they left him alone in an effort to support these two failed movie attempts. And before you respond again with, “but he got an Oscar nomination! That proves he’s awesome!”, check yourself. Oscar is political, plain and simple. It also goes (mainly) to crap nobody in the real world sees, or wants to see.

Blame the media for not covering Josh Brolin’s brave beat-down of Diane Lane. Too bad he didn’t try this on a guy. We’d be discussing Josh Brolin’s ass-kicking, and how he and his daddy are a couple of pansies.

By: Anni

Anni — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:44:34 +0000

You know, Kaylee’s post doesn’t surprise me one bit. When it was mentioned on the radio during my forty five minute commute home, the radio decided it would be relevant to ask other women to call in and offer insightful comments and advice to women about what to do with abuse in their past. I cannot count the number of times women called in defense of Brown, said that she probably deserved it because God knows she obviously did something to “make him do it” (that’s always been my favorite excuse, YOU made me do it), and played down the severity of her physical injuries to make them seem not that bad.

It’s been a long time since I’ve been that disgusted with people and other women. You’re no better, Kaylee. Have you ever been abused, love? Probably not. I didn’t come away feeling that there was anything I could do to deserve having the crap beat out of me. (If you have, however, you clearly need some counseling to undo whatever damage was done psychologically.) If Rihanna was really that much of a bitch, you know what he could’ve done instead that would’ve been much more efficient? He could have dumped her. What a concept, I know, to break it off with people you’re not compatible with, but I hear it works . . .

Also, he’s a talentless hack and doesn’t deserve any awards for anything anyway.

By: jlynn

jlynn — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:20:43 +0000

The award is for Outstanding Artist of the Year, not for his image. Sounds like that has something to do with his music career.

By: Katy

Katy — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:21:24 +0000

MC Mom – That’s exactly it! It’s an “image award”, not a Grammy or an Oscar. Yes, people win huge awards even when they do things like abuse drugs or assault people, and that is a decent point, but as stated by MC those awards are to judge a person’s performance in that field. Rotten people sometimes get praise, and that can be hard to swallow, but if someone excels in their field that is what those awards are meant to acknowledge. To those of you that are defending Brown’s right to this award, remember that it is supposed to be an award for his image, and his image is pretty terrible right now. Maybe he was nominated before all this happened (sorry, no, not happened – before he did what he did) but get realistic.

By: Crow Jane

Crow Jane — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:59:38 +0000

Oh, it was a “personal incident”. I thought he beat the sh*t out of her.

By: MC Mom

MC Mom — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:01:19 +0000

Call me crazy, jlynn, but you’d think that something called an “NAACP Image Award” would have something to do with an artist’s behavior. People supposedly win Grammys for the quality of their musical performance. I don’t think you can lump those two into the same category.

By: jlynn

jlynn — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:47:04 +0000

So what, he shouldn’t get the award he was probably nominated for months ago because of a personal incident with his girlfriend that happened last week?
Awards, whether it’s an NAACP, a Grammy, or an Emmy, have nothing to do with an artists behavior. It has to do with thier career. Chris Brown, up until now, has been insanely popular and has had a successful career at a very young age.
Remember when Natalie Cole said Amy Winehouse shouldn’t have won her Grammys because of her drug and alchohol abuse?
He probably won’t even win now, not because he doesn’t deserve it, but because of how uncomfortable it will be for the people who make the final decision as to who gets the award to give it to someone who is so publicly despised right now. The same person they thought worthy of the award when he was nominated.