Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
05
Mar
09

Let Sharon Osbourne Serve as a Warning to Rihanna

osbournesMost people have probably forgotten the time Ozzy Osbourne tried to kill his wife in a drug-fueled rage, choking her and pinning her down until she managed to hit a panic button to call the cops. Sharon forgave him, of course, to go on to her own career as the host of VH1’s Rock of Love: Charm School, in which she teaches young groupie/skanks some manners.

Except now she’s getting sued for battery by one of the cast members who says Sharon punched her and pulled her hair:

Megan Hauserman claims Sharon went ballistic during a taping, punching and grabbing her by the hair and refusing to let go, and scratching her to boot. Osbourne opened the can of whoop ass after Megan told Sharon she was famous only because she managed a brain dead rock star.

In a lawsuit filed today in L.A. County Superior Court, Hauserman is suing Osbourne for battery, negligence and infliction of emotional distress.

The irony of a knock-down, drag-out fight occurring on the set of a show called Rock of Love: Charm School is not lost on me. But there was some discussion in the comments the other day about whether Rihanna might go on to abuse someone in turn. Sometimes it happens, folks.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

33 Responses to “Let Sharon Osbourne Serve as a Warning to Rihanna”


  1. 1 manda Mar 5th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    That girl, Megan, was beyond bitch, though. She took joy in being nasty to people and I would have pulled her hair and choked her if I could.

  2. 2 Ducky Mar 5th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    I’m not proud to admit it but I watched that show. I would have hit Megan myself.

  3. 3 Swede0319 Mar 5th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    Saw the vid on youtube, and everybody is correct. Megan brought it on herself with her comments, however true they are about Ozzy. Still doen’t give Sharon the right to bitchslap her though.
    BTW, does anybody think that SO looks like Ms. Chokesondick for SouthPark?

  4. 4 StrawberryGirl Mar 5th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    The most unsympathetic victim since Robert Blake’s wife.

  5. 5 QB Mar 5th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    I don’t blame Sharon for attacking Megan , I would have done more damage.

  6. 6 bigmama Mar 5th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    I watched that episode and I still have a feeling that it was staged. I know the blonde is suing but I still feel someone set something up.

  7. 7 chrocs Mar 5th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    I don’t think Sharon’s attack on Megan was a consequence of her own abuse episode with Ozzy. She might have had the same reaction even if Ozzy never touched her. The probability of a correlation is real but I don’t think that’s the case. Same with Rihanna.

  8. 8 Chronic Malanga Mar 5th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Maybe I just like Ozzy and Sharon too much, despite their shorcomings, but Ozzy’s violence issues were due to drugs, not because he is a generally violent person if I am understanding this correctly. Sharon did leave him at one point due to the drugs and alcohol, and in the end, helped him get cleaned up. They have a very strong relationship, and she definitely wears the pants in that family. I’m not saying that drugs are an excuse to beat the crap out of someone, but from all accounts, Ozzy is not a Chris Brown or Ike Turner, who is inherently violent towards women. He just needed to get off the drugs and grow up.

    I think that Sharon is a force of nature of her own, with or without Ozzy. I wouldn’t be so quick to build a correlation here. I probably would have attacked Megan, and I am not a violent person.

  9. 9 Julie Mar 5th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    Most people become abusers if they were abused as children. This isn’t really true of domestic violence victims as adults. Most of the time the victims are terrified & have low self-esteem and wouldn’t hurt a fly. Generally, they turn the abuse inward, not outward and have a difficult time overcoming the violence without causing more themselves.

  10. 10 Minnow Mar 5th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Anyone seeking etiquette advice from the Osbourne Clan Matron deserves a good kick in the head.

  11. 11 Pastafarian Mar 5th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    Maybe Sharon’s just a jerk. Her father sure was. At least if you ask Ozzy.

  12. 12 Beige Mar 5th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    Dang. For the second time today on Deceiver, I’m seeing a situation in which I utterly do not care who wins; the fight alone is entertaining. That’s low, and I am ashamed.

    It’s still entertaining, though.

  13. 13 Kristine Mar 5th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    Well, I thought her claim was pretty bogus until I read she got scratched. You just don’t go there, bitch, I don’t care if you’re the wife of a man who bites bats in half.

  14. 14 katie Mar 5th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    its kinda odd because yeah, sharon should be teaching the girls manners and such. i didn’t watch this show (nor did i ever wash the piece of trash known as rock of love) but my sister watches it and she showed me the part where sharon poured something on that megan skank and pulled her hair. megan seemed like such an annoying little twat, so i don’t know if i can blame sharon or not haha now apparently megan is getting her own show? good god.

  15. 15 Nati Mar 5th, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    This too could have been filed under “When Douchebags Collide”…could be two douchebag articles in one. Sort of a douchebag double-feature. Or is “When douchebags attack” a better title? When douchebags attack. Other douchebags.

  16. 16 Nati Mar 5th, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    I meant, douchebag-dedicated articles…

  17. 17 Nati Mar 6th, 2009 at 1:02 am

    yep…inadvertently insulted the article. I’m sorry, Holly. The article was awesome.

  18. 18 jlynn Mar 6th, 2009 at 9:50 am

    Some people just float through life asking for it, Megan seems to be one of those people. I wish there were more people like Sharon Osborne to take them down a few notches. Instead we have television executives like the fine people at MTV who give her a reality show of her own.

  19. 19 Habanada Mar 6th, 2009 at 10:15 am

    Whoa! What happened to “NOBODY deserves that kind of treatment!” and all the fiesty sass from the Rihanna board? What about criticizing the commenters who declared that Rihanna now “deserves” what she gets because she’s going back to her abuser? Now suddenly this Megan chick “deserves what she gets” and was “asking for it”? What if Rihanna had been, theoretically, behaving that way toward Chris? What would the responses be then? I don’t like the Osbournes, I’ve never heard of this show, I don’t know what happened, but I kind of thought that “nobody” meant, well, “nobody.”

    And don’t pull out the male-female abuse vs. female-female abuse. For some reason, all violence is okay unless it’s a man against a woman, and it’s ridiculous and an instance of societal hypocrisy that is unforgivable. Cf. my comments in the *first* Rihanna post.

  20. 20 Jrod Mar 6th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    Don’t even ask…

  21. 21 Minnow Mar 6th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    Habanada~

    Maybe Chris Brown should adopt a nasal London-slum accent?

  22. 22 Beige Mar 6th, 2009 at 10:45 am

    Habanada, I do see your point. I just see a difference between something staged and something that happens in the back of a car.

    Maybe that last sentence fits in one of the Kardashian threads. Ick.

  23. 23 Habanada Mar 6th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Dude, I don’t even want to hear “back of a car” and “Kardashian” in the same comment ever again! Shame on you!

  24. 24 Minnow Mar 6th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    Uh yeah, Beige. You’re the one always getting on me for disturbing mental images…

  25. 25 Catharine Mar 6th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    Can you call a girl a douchebag? Just curious (re: Nadi’s post)

  26. 26 Minnow Mar 6th, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    Well, douchebag is much simpler than “sac de la femme toilette hygenic”.

  27. 27 Catharine Mar 6th, 2009 at 9:43 pm

    Well yeah but I’ve never heard a girl called that before. Kind of like calling a girl a prick, or a guy a b*tch isn’t it?

  28. 28 Nati Mar 7th, 2009 at 12:15 am

    Catharine asks: “Can you call a girl a douchebag?”

    Sure, why not? “Douchebag” is such a wonderful noun, it doesn’t discriminate based on gender – it can be both masculine and feminine. Plus, I already used “douchebaguette” on Gwyneth Platrow.

  29. 29 Nati Mar 7th, 2009 at 12:30 am

    I’m still not convinced it wasn’t staged. All reality shows are staged, especially on VH1. *sigh* VH1 used to be all about music, they used to show all the new music videos first. They also used to show all the indie vids, the ones you couldn’t see anywhere else. Now it’s a non-stop jerry-springer-y scream/fight fest.

    It would be funny if it had been staged and she then still sued them. I mean, what are they gonna do? It’s all on camera. They gonna have to either admit it was staged or pay up.

  30. 30 Beige Mar 7th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    Sorry, y’all. I shan’t go there again. Heh.

  31. 31 Habanada Mar 7th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    If men can’t douche, then isn’t it stranger to call them douchebags–i.e., in that women can’t be called pricks because they haven’t got any? I’ve called women pricks before. Maybe it’s time for our insults to be gender-equal! It IS the 21st century after all!

  32. 32 Beige Mar 7th, 2009 at 11:48 am

    I’ve heard Madonna called a dick before. It fits, when you think about it. I think there are aspects of behavior that merit certain descriptions, regardless of the gender associations. For example: K-Fed? Is a douchebag, because he really just isn’t man enough to be associated with prickishness. Martha Stewart, OTOH, IS man enough.

  1. 1 Sharon Osbourne, as Charming as Ever at Deceiver.com Pingback on Nov 6th, 2009 at 7:27 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




March 2009
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Jane: ‘He’s not analyzing it to the nth dress in a...
    • Pastafarian: Stupid bloggers.
    • Stan: Punk rock my ass.
    • AKS: This is the closest I’ve come to putting my...
    • Fortunate_Son: Tony Bourdain is a far left...
    • sarah: I don’t see it as hypocritical. yes he has a...
    • Pastafarian: Ooh!! No!! The baby vulture!! Beaky Buzzard!...
    • LN: Wow Pasta, you were right. And boy does he look...
    • skippy: They need to stop making cheesy, crappy movies...
    • Mermaid: never trust a politician. period. (can’t...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella