Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
12
Mar
09

DECEIVER MADNESS Round 1: Sarah-cuda vs. The (Maybe) Frankenator

politicos-headerd3-coleman-palin

Not to pour salt in the wounds of these high-profile election losers, but there’s a reason to look forward to this match-up: It’s the biggest Republican-on-Republican action in the tourney.

deceivermadnesslogo091

Like most people not from Minnesota, U.S. Senator Norm Coleman just couldn’t believe that Al Franken might pull out a win against him in the contested Minnesota Senate race last November. So he suggested the Distinguished Gentleman From Saturday Night Live concede before all the votes were in. But pride goeth before the fall, and Coleman wasn’t laughing when it suddenly started to look like there would be a Sen. Stuart Smalley after all. So he did what all gracious losers do: He sued.

And what can be said about Sarah Palin that hasn’t been said already by Tina Fey? Well, for starters, there’s the issue of first grader Piper Palin parading around with an $800 Louis Vuitton bag (or is it?) while her politico mom worked the election circuit with grand speeches about hard family-finance decisions. Or the one about wasteful earmarks after not being so against government spending when she needed the money for pet projects in Wasilla. See what I mean? Oh, yeah, you betcha.

This poll — and today’s seven other Round 1 matchups — will be open for 24 hours. Updated Brackets will be posted tomorrow.

Deceiver Madness '09 Round 1 (Politicos bracket): Pick the bigger hypocrite

  • Sarah Palin (10) (59%)
  • Norm Coleman (7) (41%)

Loading ... Loading ...

REMINDER: We’re giving away prizes to a few lucky voters every week. Wanna win some cool loot? Leave a comment below (with a valid e-mail address) telling everyone how you voted and why.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

48 Responses to “DECEIVER MADNESS Round 1: Sarah-cuda vs. The (Maybe) Frankenator”


  1. 1 Toubrouk Mar 12th, 2009 at 9:25 am

    Sarah Palin got the vote here. She’s still in Office and a danger to be a runner-up in the next Republican congress of 2012.

  2. 2 Embrodak Mar 12th, 2009 at 9:40 am

    Sarah Palin scares me. End of story.

  3. 3 Chronic Malanga Mar 12th, 2009 at 9:41 am

    Sarah Palin and her daughter, Bristol, the poster child for abstinence only education, got my vote.

  4. 4 Carlo Mar 12th, 2009 at 9:45 am

    Norm Coleman is beginning to look like a colossal whiner. That’s why he got my vote.

  5. 5 angry army wife Mar 12th, 2009 at 9:52 am

    Norm got my vote. I like lipstick on pitbulls! :)

  6. 6 bigmama Mar 12th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    Close but Sarah Palin because she has more power right now than Coleman. Plus, Franken will probably hang himself on some scandal before the end of his term.

  7. 7 Habanada Mar 12th, 2009 at 10:21 am

    Just like the posts on Sarah Palin herself, the reasons to put her up here seem pretty weak, so I vote for the other guy. And I guarantee that most of the votes for her won’t be due to hypocritical behavior but due to just plain old good fashioned hatred. But that’s okay, you know? I’m voting against the people I hate, too. So go for it!

  8. 8 Beige Mar 12th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    This was a tough call. Coleman.

  9. 9 D---- Mar 12th, 2009 at 10:29 am

    Are you putting 2 Republicans up on your site?! WTF! When did this blog join the left wing commie conspiracy?!!?

  10. 10 Saro Mar 12th, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Sarah, because nothing sounded more staged than her “folksiness”.

  11. 11 Beige Mar 12th, 2009 at 10:36 am

    D—-: This counts as our daily dose of grievance-nuggets, so we right-wing morons can remain permanently enraged. Because Rush was busy.

  12. 12 Swede0319 Mar 12th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    Sarah, you betch ya!

  13. 13 MrsCman Mar 12th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Norm – Minnesota politics are funny! I have only three words for Norm that should have echoed in his head the entire election: Governor Jesse Ventura.

  14. 14 Minnow Mar 12th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Oh-fer-geeze, it’s dat big smilin Norman fer me, doncha-no?

  15. 15 Queen Bee Mar 12th, 2009 at 11:54 am

    I had to go with Sarah, mostly because she is so pretty. Norm, not so much.

  16. 16 Nivek Mar 12th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    Coleman. Anything involving lawyers immediately makes you a loser. F the lawyers. Real individuals solve problems themselves…like Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr did.

  17. 17 Runolfr Mar 12th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    We hates Palin! We hates it forever!

  18. 18 jenn Mar 12th, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    Coleman – all the way

  19. 19 StrawberryGirl Mar 12th, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    Coleman’s a RINO, though he’s still preferable to Frakenstein, while Palin is not. Though I’m sure the lefties here will appreciate the opportunity to slam a real conservative.

  20. 20 California Dave Mar 12th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    Coleman. Since the 2000 election nonsense, he could have taken a stand and gracefully conceded.

  21. 21 luscious_t Mar 12th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    ugh – Palin That woman BLATANTLY talked out of both side of her mouth the whole election

  22. 22 kbug61 Mar 12th, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    Aaargh. You guys are making this very difficult, but I figure Coleman was doing what any self-respecting republican does–try to steal the election if you can’t win legitimately, whereas Palin puts my gastric juices in overdrive.

  23. 23 Crow Jane Mar 12th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    Going with Coleman.

  24. 24 X Mar 12th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Wow the seeding is super messed up in politicos.

    Palin. VP debates. ’nuff said.

  25. 25 cattirun Mar 12th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    everyone sues in america… it’s just a big lawsuit after the other…
    sarah on the other hand… her charisma got to me… and deceived me so her….

  26. 26 Simon Scowl Mar 12th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    I realize it’s futile, but Sarah Palin is not abstinence-only:

    http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/06/nation/na-sexed6

  27. 27 Kristine Mar 12th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    My goodness, the ignorance in the comments in this thread… republicans sue to win elections they “can’t”?! It pained me to vote for Coleman just now, because Franken *cheated* his fat ass into that seat so he should be sued (unlike when Democrats sue). However, Coleman is a RINO and I like Palin. StrawberryGirl hit a ton of nails on the head.

  28. 28 Aleric Mar 12th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Sorry neither in this bracket.

  29. 29 The Irish Mar 12th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    My vote goes toward Palin.

    Oh wait…this poll isn’t on whose hotter?

    I’ll go with Coleman then because I disdain the number of lawsuits amongst politicians.

    Also, he probably looks better in a one piece…

  30. 30 Beige Mar 12th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    I still laugh over the Onion headline: “Autopsy of Local Man Reveals 100 More Franken Votes”.

  31. 31 Scott F. Mar 12th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    I love the Cuda, so Coleman gets the vote.

    Oh, and “Coleman was doing what any self-respecting republican does–try to steal the election if you can’t win legitimately”. REAAAAALLLLY? Are you just too young to remember 2000 so you repeat BS Democrat talking points? Bush was declared the winner from the start, Gore sued to challenge the results, which at NO TIME changed the outcome. The only thing Bush’s people ’sued’ to do was stop the 15th or 16th recount.

    Republicans don’t sue to win elections, Democrats just keep counting votes until they can magically create enough for their guy to win.

  32. 32 Pastafarian Mar 12th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    I voted for the other guy to piss off the Palin Haters.

  33. 33 Beige Mar 12th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    Hey, they’ve found the Lost City of Atlantis, off the coast of Florida. It was built largely of lost Gore and Franken votes. I KNEW it.

  34. 34 Nick Mar 12th, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    Hard choice. I don’t care for either of them but I had to go with Palin on this one.

  35. 35 Christine Mar 12th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    Sarah-cuda!

  36. 36 californiaflame Mar 12th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    Palin. For all the excellent reasons mentioned above.

  37. 37 Chronic Malanga Mar 12th, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    I was not aware of Palin’s not being abstinence only, Simon. Wow. Makes Bristol’s announcement that she thought it unrealistic less of a big deal than Fox or wherever I read made it out to be.

    I wouldn’t want to change my vote though, even if I could. Sarah Palin annoys the mess out of me and that’s the least of my issues with her.

  38. 38 Marc Mar 12th, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    I guess being down would be losing to Al Franken….being kicked is because you are still dragging the whole thing out longer by suing…

  39. 39 k Mar 12th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    Oh….had to go with Palin. She needs to take care of her kids.

  40. 40 katie Mar 12th, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    after reading the first 3 comments on here, i have nothing else to say. palin!

  41. 41 Hjay Mar 12th, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    Anyone who loses to Mr. Franken gets my pity vote.

  42. 42 Rocko Mar 12th, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    I voted for Sarah. I’d sue too if practically all the found votes were for my opponent.

  43. 43 randomstalker Mar 12th, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    Sarah Palin FTW! Because her mess-ups were often more entertaining.

  44. 44 Matt Mar 12th, 2009 at 11:54 pm

    “It’s the biggest Republican-on-Republican action in the tourney.” Bad image. Eww. Well, anyway, I went with Palin, because of overexposure. It seemed like the people who really liked her were obsessed with her and the people who really didn’t like her were obsessed with her, too. And it created too much Palin talk.

  45. 45 Koka Mar 13th, 2009 at 12:35 am

    I gave it to Coleman….never show fear. The Palins just showed stupidity.

  46. 46 Nati Mar 13th, 2009 at 1:37 am

    Palin. Duh.

  47. 47 Jill Mar 13th, 2009 at 9:27 am

    Coleman

  48. 48 BFG Mar 17th, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    Both of those are weak, and are obviously just quota entries.

    They both pale in comparison to the others.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




March 2009
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Pearce: They probably did use school funds on some level....
    • Kelli: “Just like animal abusers, many drug...
    • dooflotchie: Oh HELL no! I just hit that “Contact...
    • me: Gisele pisses me off for a variety of reasons,...
    • chrocs: Well, being pregnant is not an excuse to eating...
    • Emerson: Great, if you want to define “Real”...
    • Tom: SJSnarker, Yikes that is some stomach turning tax...
    • Imabear: While I enjoy food, I don’t consider...
    • Wow: John, because you’re being an obnoxious dick.
    • angry army wife: John, All the posts are delayed for...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella