Straight out of the Phony Four, we’ve got GOOP Girl Gwyneth Paltrow giving PETA the finger again.* Or, well, the toe. According to Just Jared:
Gwyneth Paltrow and designer Valentino Garavani attend the premiere of his latest documentary, Valentino: The Last Emperor, at Los Angeles County Museum of Art’s Bing Theatre on Wednesday (April 1) in Los Angeles.
The 36-year-old actress wore a fashion-forward pair of suede Christian Louboutin “Ariella Talon” ankle boots with multi-strapped leather buckles.
They ain’t kidding about “multi.” Just look at these things. Is she auditioning for the next Hellraiser movie?
Suede! Leather! All she needs to do to complete the ensemble is drape a dead calf over her shoulders. Maybe a couple of bacon strips for earrings. Mmmmm, delicious pig flesh.
(Hat tip to Angryarmywife)
*If you’ve forgotten their little tiff, go here, here, and here.
Related posts:
- Finally, a Reason to Like Gwyneth Paltrow What if a horrible person did a selfish thing that...
- Gwyneth Paltrow Eats Fried Chicken, Then Her Words Gwyneth Paltrow supports meat-free Mondays, thinks Brits are more intelligent...
- Gwyneth Paltrow Gets Experts To Say We’re All Just Jealous Most of the time I’m not sure who Gwyneth thinks...
- We Get It, Gwyneth: America Stinks Gaunt GOOPmistress Gwyneth Paltrow is at it again! Remember a...
- Gwyneth And Her Chicken Gwyneth Paltrow is a little slow. I’m sure you remember...
Wonder how long it takes to put those bitches on?
I am working on a documentary confirming a direct inverse corollary between how much money one has and how little fashion sense one possesses. All donations are welcome.
Good heavens, those are some ugly shoes.
I think she just realized she was losing out to Algore and decided to sprint for the line.
Syd, I think the Gwynnstyr is pretty much used to strapping her bitch on.
Come on Simon, Pinhead has much better fashion sense than to match naugahide-tan against ash grey.
If you’re going to be a hypocrite, at least do it for a good reason — those things are just ugly. Do I even want to know what she paired them with?!
All you have to do is zip up the back. I like those boots! Not, however, with a dress. Booties look awful against bare legs, even if your legs are a mile long. They are just so unflattering. But those would probably look better with some long boot cut or wide leg trousers.
oh wait, nevermind.
http://gofugyourself.celebuzz.com/go_fug_yourself/2009/03/fugneth_paltrow.html#more
they look like socks and sandals or something. Probably cost about $1000
These shoes are perfect for the girl who could never decide between being a ballerina or a cowboy.
And yeah, I can see how Helen Keller would think those shoes would look good with . . . anything.
Kristine summed it up. At least be a good looking hypocrite. Those shoes are ghastly.
The shoes actually look as though they were designed for a prom whose theme was “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”. Fug. Ly.
huh. it didn’t post my follow up.
http://gofugyourself.celebuzz.com/go_fug_yourself/2009/03/fugneth_paltrow.html#more
still think they could work with pants, but they just look weird from the front.
Okay, now I know there’s a conspiracy to make Gwyneth Paltrow the winner of the 2009 Deceiver Awards. I can’t prove it but I am sure there a cabal out there to frame her.
So, Manda, all she has to do is to enter the room backward? Well, easier to kick her bony ass, then.
Yeah, it really shouldn’t be this easy.
Even other notable Hollywood squishybrains consider her rather feeble-minded.
What’s with her legs? Are those goose bumps, razor burn or enlarged hair follicles? You can see those in the picture above and in manda’s picture too. What are they? ugh But I definitely prefer seeing just her legs in a picture instead of having to look at the rest of her. That’s how she should always photograph, those swiss dot legs are a lot less scary, nasty and ugly looking than her face.
good god, how ugly!
Actually, i like the shoes – but I’d prefer them with slim pants or jeans. I’m not into this ankle boot w/ short skirts trend of the last year or so.
I figured out why she is wearing such ugly shoes: it distracts from her hypocrisy! What are we all posting about? Ewww, those are so unattractive! We have fallen for it, completely forgotten that the point is that they are made from animal skin. Behold the evil genius that is GOOP.
I cannot believe that these are the latest fashion. I see them everywhere. It looks like something someone would wear who is into S&M. Not that I know that is or anything. *cough*
To get a full range of her and “orange man”, here is a link to all the photos. The dress is not that bad besides the fact that everything blends into her, which may not be a bad thing considering she is lacking in the beauty department
http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/04/02/gwyneth-paltrow-last-empress/
Gwynnie has a tendency to ruin a great outfit with Tim Burton footwear.
I noticed the chicken flesh right away too. Although the festive polkadots aren’t half as bad as the leg and knee bruises in manda’s shot. It’s rather hard to pull off a fierce fashionista look when you dry shave with a rusty razor and trip over the bathmat on the way out.
Speaking from experience, it sucks to have really dark leg hair and very pale skin.
I may just be insane, but seeing where she shaved her legs makes me feel much less insecure when you can see it on my own.
Which you can’t, because I never wear skirts or shorts.