Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
10
Apr
09

Clash of the Tit(an)s

Pretty much every moral authority on Earth has weighed in on the case of Nadya Suleman, AKA Octomom, AKA The Role Janeane Garofalo Was Born to Play. But there’s one voice of reason that, as far as I’m willing to bother to double-check, has withheld comment: Kim Kardashian.

Now that silence has been broken:

kim-kardashian-octomom-sunglasses-040909

Why is Octomom wearing my Jimmy Choo sunglasses!? I think it’s a little ridiculous that she claims she has no money and is on welfare to take care of her 14 children, yet she is out shopping and buying Jimmy Choo sunglasses!

I guess she’d rather spend her octo-dollars on accessories. Aren’t 14 accessories enough, Octomom?? Am I sensing a shopping addiction here? Khloe and Kourtney can hook you up with someone who can help you battle this!

You know what? It might not be the popular thing to admit, but I gotta side with Crazy McBabymaker here. Sure, they’re both sociopathic narcissists, and neither one of them has earned a dime of the money they spend on doodads and frippery for themselves. But at least Octomom has produced something.

And I get the feeling her reality show will be a lot less boring.

(Hat tip: The Superficial)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

41 Responses to “Clash of the Tit(an)s”


  1. 1 Fortunate Son Apr 10th, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    Octomom is fourteen times as entertaining as the Kardassians. Watched that show once and Bruce Jenner just seemed mortified to be associated with it. PS, what happened to his face?

  2. 2 angry army wife Apr 10th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    I have to agree with Kim here. For someone who raised money for her kids via the internet and paid for her invitro through college financial aid, needs to get a reality check. How can she think she is that important to own the stuff that she does, like these sunglasses? And how niave for those people who gave her money for her kids not thinking that she would spend it on crap like this. Ever heard of Target Octomom?

  3. 3 Swede0319 Apr 10th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    I have no idea on which way to go on this one. One is a no-talent blob body that hooked-up with a running back and the other is an attention grabing, turkey baster loving moron.
    I hate having to make a descision like this!

  4. 4 Habanada Apr 10th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    Well, I have to say that the truth has come from stranger sources, and I love the riff about “aren’t 14 accessories enough?”

    But Simon’s riff about “at least Octomom’s producd *something*” wins. Haha. I’m going to go laugh for a little while now.

  5. 5 Anagram Apr 10th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    i agree with kim. octomom has no job, is basically on welfare, and, quite frankly, has much better things to spend her money on than $600 sunglasses.

  6. 6 Jrod Apr 10th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    As soon as octomom has terrible sex with a c-list celebrity, video tapes it, claims to have “lost” it, and leaks it to the world via internet…then she will be as interesting as Paris Hilton. Wait…wrong celebrity?

    You can’t fault Kim for following a sucessful business plan!

  7. 7 Swede0319 Apr 10th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    What a minute! Those sunglasses cost six bills? Holy Crap Batman!

  8. 8 Beige Apr 10th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Nothing, nowhere and no way, will make me side with Octomom. I may loathe the Kardashians with the depth of a thousand seas, but that’s still less than I loathe Suleman.

  9. 9 angry army wife Apr 10th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Beige ditto. And I would never spend that kind of money of things that can easily be broken, especially if a small child gets a hold of them. I like my $12 bargains.

  10. 10 Vagrant Dog Apr 10th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    Good lord, nobody blinks at Kim calling children “accessories?”

    On a lighter note, we don’t have to worry about Octomom for much longer, because I’ve finally figured out her plan. See, in East Asia you can sell a kid for somewhere about $80,000. It’s obvious that this whole 14 kids thing is merely an investment, and as soon as the price of children peaks she’s going to sell them off and disappear with a couple million dollars.
    I would like to add that I in no way found the black market price for children while considering what I could do with my own.

  11. 11 Simon Scowl Apr 10th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    Good lord, nobody blinks at Kim calling children “accessories?”

    Well, she’s kinda right. It’s not like their mom thinks of them as human.

  12. 12 Queen Bee Apr 10th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    I saw her comments on Radar, that linked to Kim’s site. As of yesterday, her dear “readers” were ripping Kim a new one. I was actually a little surprised at how angry people were at Kim for questioning Nadya’s spending of money on frivolous items. In the photos, it looks like they are both wearing the same sunglasses. Big difference? Kim’s were paid for by money her dad earned or she has earned from whoring herself out on E. Octomom is spending her money on frivolous crap yet wanting to bill the state of California to the tune of $2000 a month so she can feed her kids. Now, I am no math genius or a big budgeting kind of person but I think that $600 could be used to actually feed her kids. Same with the $195 she paid for Tory Burch shoes and the $1200 she paid for make up.
    I’m giving Kim the win.

  13. 13 Toubrouk Apr 10th, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    I go with Queen bee on this and my bull**** scale tip towards the spawn-maker. Kim Kardashian is a worthless Reality-TV Diva but nobody else than her and her family is footing the bill for her lifestyle.

  14. 14 Habanada Apr 10th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    Vagrant–Yeah, I’m with Simon again. While we don’t believe that the children are inhuman, their mother treats them as accessories, and therefore the description isn’t surprising. Unfortunately, Octo isn’t isolated in this phenomenon. I’ve witnessed this “child as lifestyle acessory” in person and that is what should raise eyebrows–the treatment, not the description of it.

  15. 15 Katy Apr 10th, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    I may loathe the Kardashians more than what my cats leave in the litter box but Kim couldn’t be more right. She may feel the need to sound off on everything because she is desperate for attention but I can’t really argue with her here. If Octo had a full-time job (which she shouldn’t anyway with 14 kids) I still wouldn’t be okay with a purchase like that. My mom always worked full time and we still barely scraped by, she would never ever EVER splurge on something like that. I think every mother deserves to treat herself but within her means. This is just ridiculous.

  16. 16 katie Apr 10th, 2009 at 10:38 pm

    the kardashians are completely worthless. i’m sick of hearing about both of these fools.. but i’d say pushing out a ton of kids is a little more entertaining than kim kardashian’s career.. whatever the hell that is.

  17. 17 Shoe Apr 10th, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    where I live there are a lot of walfare mommas and poppas wearing designer wear and they may or may not have 14 kids … that they know of

    of course there are a bunch of uneducated bimbos doing the same

  18. 18 Elle Apr 11th, 2009 at 12:17 am

    “My Jimmy Choo sunglasses” – lulz.

    I didn’t realize that once a skanky d-list celebrity wears something that all us other mere mortals must meet her moral approval before we wear them as well.

    I wouldn’t say I’m *siding* with Octomom here, but Kim is being patently ridiculous.

  19. 19 winewife Apr 11th, 2009 at 2:11 am

    Simon, doodads and frippery? Boy, if I wasn’t already nursing a serious crush on you those words alone would be enough to push me over the edge. You gotta love a man that knows his arcane English.

  20. 20 katie Apr 11th, 2009 at 3:12 am

    i just realized kim said MY jimmy choo sunglasses. LOL bitch plz. someone get this tramp a job.. other than screwing on tape you know.

  21. 21 sushshaf Apr 11th, 2009 at 3:14 am

    i had to laugh that kk was upset and passing judgement. who cares what she thinks. i am with nadya.

  22. 22 Chronic Malanga Apr 11th, 2009 at 4:53 am

    I have no love for the Kardashians and think of them all as a collective of ass hats. However, is she really saying anything new that we haven’t all said in some way or another? The only difference is that for some reason, her opinion on the issue made it to the tabloids. Her undeserved income isn’t coming from student loans/donations/the government.

  23. 23 bigmama Apr 11th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    The only reason I’m siding with Giant Ass is that I have to pay for the baby making heiffer’s glasses and I can’t even afford those on my own. At least GA makes her own cash and not taking welfare. Also, is there even an investigation about all the money Octomom has used for other things besides the kids?

  24. 24 Ani Apr 11th, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    As much as I can’t stand the Kardashians, at least they aren’t frauding the government out of money or misusing student loans. Besides, if KK got in-vitro she would at least have the means to support the kids without being a leech and frauding the system.

  25. 25 Nati Apr 12th, 2009 at 12:33 am

    katie, that “MY” stuck out to me, too, I just didn’t know what to say. They both are so loathsome, it makes it impossible (for me) to side with either of them here.

  26. 26 katie Apr 12th, 2009 at 7:01 am

    nati.. i agree. with everyone weighing in on octo-mom (i pray her 15 mins is up soon. i also said that about heidi and spencer. gag) kim probably thought “why should my attention whore ass miss out on the fun?”

  27. 27 Heather Apr 12th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    I’m just loving the fact that someone else used the word “frippery”

  28. 28 michelle Apr 12th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    Funny how even a moron can see that Octomom is nuts. If you want to be useless, selfish, spoiled, whatever that is your choice. But when you have kids, and your life is supposedly all about them, how can you justify spending cash (that you are begging for)on sunglasses? So impractical, so easily broken, but a celeb must-have when the paps are following you. This tells us allot about how Octo sees herself. Not a mom, but a celeb. I think we are all just a little miffed that KK had to point this out to us.

  29. 29 QB Apr 12th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Since when Kim is the designer for Jimmy Choo?? because she is not wearing Kim’s Jimmy Choo she is wearing Octomom’s Jimmy Choo. Apart from that I agree with Kim/

  30. 30 LN Apr 12th, 2009 at 8:18 pm

    Are you sure they aren’t knock-offs? I have seen many “good” knock-offs where the only way you can tell the difference is when you look at inside the arm.

    Has anyone asked Octofreak if they are real? Because I am sure she is willing to tell you, as she as shared so much already.

  31. 31 Christina X Apr 12th, 2009 at 11:54 pm

    While I agree with Kim Kardashian and hate to admit it, who gave Kim Kardashian the idea to start giving her opinion on everything?

    It’s not like her opinion’s revolutionary or anything, since most of the world has said it before she had…but Kim Kardashian’s just trying to prove that she’s “intelligent” and more than just another porno android. She’s trying to get more people to like her by being relatable, but she just isn’t relatable at all. What she is, is a narcissist who just wants everyone to like her, but at the end of the day, her need for acceptance AMIDST being just another bimbo is honestly very annoying.

    And Keeping Up With the Kardashians puts me to sleep every time I watched it.

  32. 32 angry army wife Apr 13th, 2009 at 9:10 am

    As much as I hate the whole K family, many of you are right. They do not try to get their money by defrauding student loan companies, and reaching out to the public to help raise the kids that they paid for to have. They can afford the money they spend on clothes, unlike this crazy octo chick. Appearances seem that she does spend more money on her than her kids, including the plastic surgery. Regardless of how you feel about Kim, you have to admit that she is right when it comes to this lady and her inability to see how damaging this is to her kids. Even the $195 she spent on shoes could buy a lot of diapers.

  33. 33 Elle Apr 13th, 2009 at 10:26 am

    Christina X,

    Technically, Kim would be a porno “gynoid” not a porno “android”

    . . . . . yes, I’m a complete geek.

  34. 34 Beige Apr 13th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    I think “Keeping Up With the Kardashians” would be a LOT more interesting if it starred an elite team of snipers.

  35. 35 layup33 Apr 13th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    Nikki Reed had these shades on during an interview about her up and coming film Chain letter

  36. 36 superb33 Apr 13th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Yo, the new movie chain letter starring Nikki Reed is to be released in the summer. Nikki reed had these same glasses on

  37. 37 Pastafarian Apr 13th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    So………..Do you guys have some interest in this “Chain Letter” movie?

    See her at dateamillionaire.com!

    (made up domain name- you may not actually find a millionaire to date)

    And so forth.

  38. 38 Minnow Apr 13th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    Damn. Cuz I really need a new millionaire.

  39. 39 bigmama Apr 13th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    Pasta, you mean you’re not a millionaire?

  40. 40 MC Mom Apr 13th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    I’m with you, Beige. Combine “Keeping up with the K’s” with something about those awesome Navy sharpshooters in the Indian Ocean and you’ve got a monster hit.

  41. 41 Nati Apr 14th, 2009 at 3:44 am

    Christina X and katie, I think you guys said it best – Kim just wanted to say something she knew everyone would agree with, just to get people to agree with her. A pathetic (failed) attempt to render herself more likeable.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




April 2009
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Catharine: Ya know, I’m surprised PeTA...
    • David Maggard: Lets get it clear they feel animals are...
    • Pearce: fallingstar, I’m 6′, 125 lbs, and...
    • Mfrag: Sadly to me it looks like she had a stroke in that...
    • Hurricane: “Help me! I’m melting! I’m...
    • chrocs: “Rumor has it Chris Martin has become as...
    • Fortunate_Son: I suggest all his coworkers immediately...
    • Fortunate_Son: I hope she washed her hands and utensils...
    • demonterius: i food fried chicken
    • Fortunate_Son: I must say that Holly is a true industry...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella