Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
23
May
09

How Can Trudie Styler Save the Planet Without Helping to Destroy It?

Last week, Britain’s The Guardian newspaper joined all rational people in mocking Trudie Styler, wife of Sting and savior of Gaia, for flying herself and her entourage all over the place in private jets to tell us how bad oil companies are. A couple of weeks ago, she took a break from telling us WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE FROM GLOBAL WARMING to take a private jet across the Atlantic with her cook and her hairdresser and her hairdresser’s hairdresser and whoever else to go to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. There she rubbed elbows and egos with her fellow celebrities, socialites, and other assorted cultural detritus who have absolutely nothing to do with the White House or its correspondents. The Guardian pointed out her hypocrisy, and it was good.

Well, Trudie ain’t havin’ it. She wrote back to them, and it’s a real beaut:

Given the Guardian’s reputation for a positive stance on the environment, I was angered and saddened by the cheap and scathing tone of your “Lost in showbiz” article about me (Trudie Styler: saving the world one private jet flight at a time, 15 May).

It sought to demolish my credibility as an environmental campaigner by laying charges of hypocrisy against my readily admitted occasional use of private aviation fuel as well as many (less reported) flights on scheduled commercial flights. The article’s gripe extended to a sour attempt to create some sort of faux class envy around me in seeking to “focus … on madam’s most cherished public pose: that of eco warrior”.

The piece turned on the curious assertion that “Trudie’s lifestyle compromises her environmental message so fatally that she can only be a big oil ­double agent created … with the sole aim of undermining an important message with her rank hypocrisy”. Ironically the publication of this article, with its unsustainable attack on my integrity, actually casts the Guardian in the role of double agent. You have given succour to what I would have assumed was a mutual foe, the Chevron oil company.

For many years much of my work as an environmental campaigner has focused on exposing the devastation caused to large parts of Ecuador by Chevron during its exploitation of drilling rights. The recent documentary, Crude, in which I played a substantial role, has effectively concentrated global opposition to Chevron’s continued refusal to make proper recompense for damage to thousands of lives.

Your article will be invaluable to those working on behalf of Chevron who seek to undermine this 14-year campaign through attacking my reputation.

It goes on from there, but you get the idea: Shut up, peasants. Without me, the rainforests will die! And note the clever use of the ecocrite’s new favorite trick: “Sure, okay, I say one thing and do another. I admit it! So get over it, even though I’m not going to stop.”

Congrats on being in a movie, Trudie. I’ll put that in my Netflix queue right after Brimstone & Treacle.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

25 Responses to “How Can Trudie Styler Save the Planet Without Helping to Destroy It?”


  1. 1 California Dave May 23rd, 2009 at 5:50 am

    Remember, kids – she’s rich so she can do what she wants. She’s also British, or the “rich” part would be frowned upon by The One.

    Oh wait, she’s a rich liberal. Never mind – she gets the Moral Authority Card!

  2. 2 Disco Stu May 23rd, 2009 at 6:17 am

    Over an over, the same desperation comes up:

    The Spoiled Rich don’t hate the poor – hell, they *need* them to feel rich. The Spoiled Rich hate the capitalist middle class that is able to enjoy the amazing luxuries today that was once reserved for the truly privileged.

    Homes with… YARDS!
    Time allowed for… TRAVEL!
    Extra money for… SAVINGS!

    Damn, I feel special with my middle-americana job that 99% of history’s populace would die for….

  3. 3 jenn May 23rd, 2009 at 8:32 am

    you give some people enough rope and they will hang themselves. She comes off looking like even more of a jackass than she did before she wrote the letter.

  4. 4 LN May 23rd, 2009 at 8:34 am

    Everytime I see her, I am reminded of the phase Sting went through..remember the one where he went on and on and on about his fabulous tantric (sp) sex life that he and Trudy have.

  5. 5 Ghoouch May 23rd, 2009 at 10:58 am

    The Chevron in Ecuador legal battle was a recent story on CBS’ “60 Minutes” recently. Funny thing, they never once mentioned Trudie. There were lots of lawyers, engineers, scientists, and politicians interviewed, but not one celebrity poseur.

    Such ingrates.

  6. 6 flirt May 23rd, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    It feels like she wrote that letter with a thesauras at her elbow.
    Succour? Recompense? Seriously?

  7. 7 Patrick of Atlantis May 23rd, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    LN
    Nutty chick and tantric sex are kind of a package deal. You can’t get one without the other. I’d love to be proven wrong, but I don’t think I am.

  8. 8 Shikatehead May 23rd, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    I doubt she even wrote it. She probably got her writer’s writer to write it. And everytime I think “tantric”, I think of two naked people standing face-to-face, pressing palms together and moving their hands around in circular gestures, with New Age in the background. How utterly mind-fuckingly boring.

  9. 9 Koka May 23rd, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    Guess we got told that yes, she has a stick up her bum…and that stick is solid gold.

    Like jenn said, her reply made her look even more of a jackass.

  10. 10 Bruce May 23rd, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    “my readily admitted occasional use of private aviation fuel”

    A new euphimism for flying aound in luxurious private jets?

    Or an admission of some deeper problem?

  11. 11 Pastafarian May 23rd, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    …”readily admitted occasional use of private aviation fuel as well as many (less reported) flights on scheduled commercial flights.”

    Gee I wonder which uses more fuel. A Learjet with two passengers, or a fully loaded 975,000 pound Boeing 747. Either way this sub-moron loses.

    No one’s cared about Sting for at least 15 years, I wonder what makes her think anyone would care about his spouse?

  12. 12 Patrick of Atlantis May 23rd, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    By the way, Chevron/Texaco didn’t harm the Ecuadorian rain forest, other than bring civilization to it. ‘Crude’ is a propaganda piece which is meant to aid in the shakedown by environmental klepto-lawyers of a good corporation. I am a witness and unlike the producers of ‘Crude’, I have no monetary incentive to lie.

  13. 13 Mickey Blue Eyes May 23rd, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    The difference between a luxury private jet and a commercial flight is that, while a 747 consumes more fuel than a G5 or whatever she uses, the commercial flight was going where it was going anyway, whether she was going there or not. In fact, by taking a commercial flight, the carbon footprint of the 747 per passenger/luggage/cargo would be reduced.

    If she truly loved Gaia as she claims, she would take a sailboat, the method of travel with the smallest carbon footprint, from England to U.S. But a commercial flight would be an acceptable compromise. As I said above, the commercial flight was going to fly anyway, so she would not add to the global carbon emissions by using a charter flight.

    She is like other Socialist Labor Party British rich celebrities, no f’ing clue or common sense.

  14. 14 Pastafarian May 23rd, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    You’re right the sailboat is a perfect option. They should all travel like that, then it would be several weeks at least before we had to hear from them again. Or if we’re really lucky, at all.

  15. 15 Aleric May 24th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    Did they ever ask her to produce the records of the flights she took on commercial airlines? I bet she can’t produce one legitimate copy.

  16. 16 MC Mom May 24th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    My favorite part of this lovely letter was at the end, when she practically accuses The Guardian of being an accomplice to environmental devastation by daring to question her activities. I’m not sure “jackass” is a strong enough word, Jenn and Koka.

  17. 17 Fortunate Son May 24th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    Trudy’s got a wonky boob job.

  18. 18 Beige May 25th, 2009 at 12:01 am

    I think she should only be allowed to travel whilst stapled to the underbelly of a (sustainable) fire-breathing gryffon. I hear GOOP has a passel of those.

    I hate celebrities more every day, and Trudie ain’t helping matters.

  19. 19 angry army wife May 25th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    Remember, she is rich therefore has meaning in this world. Us lowly people who actually made her rich just need to shut up and never question them.

  20. 20 California Dave May 25th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    But the rich are evil! Obama says so, therefore it must be true!

  21. 21 Beige May 25th, 2009 at 8:14 pm

    “Trudy’s got a wonky boob job.”

    Well, he did tour w/the Police for a long time, and I hear that’s rough on ya. Probably turn anybody wonky, really.

  22. 22 This Guy May 26th, 2009 at 10:51 am

    I love how she touts her taking a lot more commercial flights in addition to her several private ones. It’s like the obese person who has three salads with their KFC bucket and acts like they’ve compensated.

  23. 23 MC Mom May 26th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    CA Dave, you’re forgetting that it’s only certain rich people that Obama says are evil…I think people like Trudie and Oprah get a pass.

  24. 24 Minnow May 27th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    Wow.

    The dinner conversation in the Styler-Sumner house must be so very enthralling, fervid, fomentous, and perspicacious.

    See Trudi, I gots me a thesaurus too.

  25. 25 ShyAsrai May 28th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    i’m heartily sick of the “let them eat cake” disconnect demonstrated by people who have the temerity- nay, the stunning audacity! – to lecture others on the evils of consumption whilst consuming in bigger gulps than anyone else!

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




May 2009
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Emerson: Great, if you want to define “Real”...
    • Tom: SJSnarker, Yikes that is some stomach turning tax...
    • Imabear: While I enjoy food, I don’t consider...
    • Wow: John, because you’re being an obnoxious dick.
    • angry army wife: John, All the posts are delayed for...
    • John: I will ask again Why am I censored
    • John: why am i censored
    • John: “After this year, I think the Ed Block folks...
    • John: After this year, I think the Ed Block folks may...
    • jenny: @Pearce….. So sad for your loss. My...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella