Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network

Archive for August, 2009

31
Aug

Green Water Bottles And Their Chemicals

sigg

Because everyone needs overpriced heavy-metal water bottles, SIGG prided itself in creating BPA-free, environmentally-friendly water carriers often seen carried by hippie/hipster tree-hugging folk.

People freaked out about the BPA chemical contained in plastic water bottles and created these ugly things. (Turns out the FDA never even recommended discontinuing use of products containing BPA.) Awesome, we’re all ok to keep drinking out of our Nalgene and Gatorade bottles.

But if you bought one of the environmentally friendly (assumed chemical-free) SIGG bottles prior to August 2008, it wasn’t as chemical-free as you might have hoped.  The CEO of SIGG posted a letter on the company’s website letting consumers know that if you bought your better bottle more than a year ago, it actually contains the BPA chemical you were probably trying to avoid by purchasing it.

In the future, maybe just reuse a bottle you already have before going out and purchasing one of these $20 (or more) water bottles.

h/t: Gawker

31
Aug

Note: A Seat in Congress Isn’t a Lifetime Appointment

It shouldn’t be, anyway. Although you wouldn’t know it by the way some of our fine elected officials have been behaving lately!

First up is New Hampshire Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter, who has come up with a clever way of dealing with people who ask her questions in townhall meetings that she doesn’t feel like answering:

YouTube Preview Image

Ed Morrissey notes: “I’ve watched this video a couple of times, and I still can’t figure out why the police took this man out of the room.” Apparently because he asked whether the guy in the purple SEIU shirt, the one trying to drown out his question, was even a resident of New Hampshire. The implication being that the young fellow was bussed in from somewhere else. But that would be astroturfing! So out the older guy goes.

Oh, sorry, he was ejected because he didn’t have a ticket to speak. As Now Hampshire notes (emphasis mine):

In four short years Carol Shea-Porter has evolved from a rabble-rousing, town hall disrupting anti-war activist who once had to be forcibly removed from a President George Bush event in Portsmouth to a Member of Congress who instructed armed security guards to remove a frustrated voter from her own town hall event in Manchester on Saturday.

In the appended video, Shea-Porter can be seen instructing security to remove a man for standing to ask a question without a ticket. Shea-Porter previously held a lottery to determine who could ask questions. She can also be heard taunting the man on his way out by saying, “I do hope the movie theater can be a little quieter for you…”

“The irony is, of course, that Shea-Porter used to be a ‘tea-bagger’ on the left,” writes Nashua Telegraph columnist Kevin Landrigan. “She stalked then-congressman Jeb Bradley at town hall-style meetings the 1st District Republican incumbent held throughout his district.”

Four years ago Carol Shea-Porter protested at the State House alongside people dressed as Nazis while accusing the federal government of trying “to brand us like sheep.” On Saturday, she disparagingly referred to people who do not trust the same federal government to run our health care system as “these people.”

Nazis, eh? So the government is a bunch of Nazis when you’re one of the people, and then when you win a position in the government, it’s the people who are the Nazis. Nazi see, Nazi do!

Bonus: The guy who was escorted out, Carl Tomanelli, is a retired NYC cop.

Next up is the always-charming Nevada Senator Harry Reid. According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal:

On Wednesday, before he addressed a Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce luncheon, Reid joined the chamber’s board members for a meet-’n'-greet and a photo. One of the last in line was the Review-Journal’s director of advertising, Bob Brown, a hard-working Nevadan who toils every day on behalf of advertisers. He has nothing to do with news coverage or the opinion pages of the Review-Journal.

Yet, as Bob shook hands with our senior U.S. senator in what should have been nothing but a gracious business setting, Reid said: “I hope you go out of business.”

And hello to you too, Senator! Keep up the good fight against those “evil-mongers.” Republicans tend to reserve the word “evil” for other countries that hate America, but now we know that the real bad guys are American citizens who disagree with your policies. If they’re members of the press, even worse!

Charlie_Rangel,_official_109th_Congress_photoAnd finally, good ol’ New York Congressman Charlie Rangel. Charlie, Charlie, Charlie… NY Post:

Rep. Charles Rangel claimed on mortgage papers that a Harlem brownstone was his principal residence — even though he was living elsewhere at the time, The Post has learned.

When the Democrat — who is under investigation by the House Ethics Committee — took out the mortgage in 1990, he said the property on West 132nd Street was his “principal residence,” records show.

But Rangel has been living since the 1970s in Harlem’s Lenox Terrace apartment complex, where he improperly amassed four rent-stabilized properties.

State law requires that rent-regulated apartments be the tenant’s residence…

Newly filed financial-disclosure reports show Rangel has understated his annual earnings, his assets and his business dealings by millions of dollars since 2002, The Post has reported.

Whoops! NY Post again:

Rep. Charles Rangel failed to report as much as $1.3 million in outside income — including up to $1 million for a Harlem building sale — on financial-disclosure forms he filed between 2002 and 2006, according to newly amended records.

And according to the Boston Herald:

New York Rep. Charles Rangel is facing more questions over his personal finances after an amended report he filed this month shows he failed to disclose up to $500,000 in assets in 2007.

An amended report to his 2007 Congressional disclosure form indicates that Rangel’s assets include a checking account with a balance between $250,000 and $500,000.

And what makes all this tax-dodging tomfoolery so delicious?

Rangel is the powerful chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, which writes the tax code.

With all that tax-free cash, you’d think Rangel could afford lozenges! Sounds like he smokes ground-glass cigars or something.

It’s tough to keep up with all the corruption and hypocrisy in government these days, but that seems like a good start. If you’ve got a good one, leave it in the comments!

31
Aug

Claire Danes Presents Her Expert Findings on Monogamy

claire-danes-hugh-dancyCelebitchy got its hands on an advance copy of Claire Danes’s hugely hypocritical interview with BlackBook Magazine, and I don’t know how I went so long without knowing that the erstwhile Angela Chase is such an insufferable windbag.

She really loves to hear herself talk about relationships:

While she’s had several serious relationships in the past—she dated Australian indie-pop star Ben Lee for six years and was with [Billy] Crudup for two, just prior to [fiancé Hugh] Dancy—marriage, she says, was never something for which she yearned. “I’ve always wanted to be in a partnership, I’ve always wanted to have that kind of intimacy and collaborate with someone in such a deep way. But I think that can be achieved in a lot of ways. I was talking to my friend recently about monogamy—is it feasible, is it realistic? I resolved that there isn’t really a better model. We just can’t shake monogamy. It definitely demands a kind of rigor and discipline and selflessness. But it’s also fun.”

Hmmm. If you haven’t been following Claire Danes’s love life over the past decade — and really, why would you — you might have missed the time Billy Crudup left then-7-months-pregnant Mary Louise Parker for her. That was most certainly a display of rigor and discipline and selflessness for the ages.

Then later, she hooked up with Hugh Dancy while she was still in a relationship with Crudup, which sort of serves Crudup right for ditching his pregnant partner of seven years.

This is some juicy stuff right here — I can’t wait until she gets hers in the third act.

31
Aug

Demi Moore Denies Plastic Surgery With Eerily Straight Face

demi_moore_2009Unless she’s drinking the blood of virgin unicorns, I don’t see how it’s possible that Demi Moore can say she’s never gone under the knife. But she continues to perpetuate the myth in French Marie Claire’s new issue:

The Hollywood star, 46, has managed to stay looking like a woman in her twenties for two decades, prompting speculation that she has spent at least £200,000 remodelling her face and body.

But in an interview in with French Marie Clare, Moore flatly denied that she had ever had any surgery.

“It’s completely false, I’ve never had it done,” she said, adding: “But I would never judge those who have.

“If it’s the best thing for them, then I don’t see a problem.”

Moore went on to say that she disliked the idea of undergoing surgery “to hold up the ageing process.”

“It’s a way to combat your neurosis. The scalpel won’t make you happy.

“That said, the day when I start crying when I look at myself in the mirror might be the day when I’m less adamant about not having it done,” she said.

“For the moment I prefer to be a beautiful woman of my age than try desperately to look thirty.”

Is she being coy? Because she doesn’t look like any other 46 year old on the planet. In fact, she looks better now than when she was 30. And I’m sure she knows it.

She’s long maintained that her preternaturally youthful looks are due to … something else, and definitely not Dr. Brian Novack. But come on. It’s Hollywood, and plastic surgery is not just for “other people,” so let’s drop the pretense.

28
Aug

Jeremy Piven Triumphant

Woo, Piven! You did it, buddy! According to the LA Times:

Jeremy Piven avoided a large payout after an arbitrator ruled Thursday he did not break his contract when he abruptly dropped out of the hit Broadway revival of “Speed-the-Plow” last December. Piven said he left because of fatigue brought on by high levels of mercury in his bloodstream. And the reason given for these elevated levels? His sushi addiction. As the play’s author, David Mamet, acidly remarked at the time, “My understanding is that he is leaving show business to pursue a career as a thermometer.”

Whew! Well, this obvious victory of justice hasn’t cured everyone’s skepticism. In fact, it prompted “The Grand Conspirator” at Heeb Magazine to add:

Now that Jeremy Piven’s fishy tale is safely off the hook—an arbitrator ruled in Piven’s favor in the dispute with the producers of Broadway’s Speed-the-Plow over his departure from the play—I suppose it won’t hurt to reveal what I heard. Last year, around the same time that Piven claimed that mercury poisoning forced him to drop out of David Mamet’s play, I attended a Tiny Vaudeville production in Los Angeles with Piven’s then personal assistant. Sitting in the theater waiting for the show to begin, I couldn’t resist asking about his boss’s fish eating habits. If anybody was to know the real story, it had to be the assistant; who do you think was making all those posh sushi bar reservations and placing to-go orders for sashimi? His response was discreet, but definitive—the mercury poisoning was “bulls***.”

Bulls***? What, like he’d make up an outrageous story to get out of a job he didn’t like, and then he’d be too arrogant to admit what everybody knows already? Phhhht! This is the Pivster we’re talkin’ about here, people!

Piven’s got a movie out right now, doesn’t he? Has anybody seen it? And by “anybody” I mean “anybody on Earth.” Nope, doesn’t look like it. Hey, fish aren’t the only things that can flop!

28
Aug

ABC Won’t Run “Partisan” Ad

America’s Broadcasting Crazies aka ABC news is refusing to run a national ad critical of Obama’s healthcare reform plan.

YouTube Preview Image

Remember in June when ABC ran that awesome (read: extremely boring) health care special while being hosted by the Obama White House?  Well now ABC news has said they will not run the ad that pokes holes in Obamacare because it is “partisan.”  ABC spokeswoman Susan Sewell said in her written statement,

The ABC Television Network has a long-standing policy that we do not sell time for advertising that presents a partisan position on a controversial public issue.   Just to be clear, this is a policy for the entire network, not just ABC News.

I love when our lovely unbiased news networks refuse to run paid advertisements like this one from the League of American Voters (a non-profit group that advocates individual liberty and government accountability).  CBS has approved the ad for national distribution while NBC is still considering the ad pending a few revisions.  Just ABC won’t sell time for partisan positions on controversial public issues, but they’re happy to include them in regularly scheduled news programming.

ABC in all their “non-partisan” glory deserves to be questioned for selling out to Obama’s healthcare propaganda while refusing to run an ad that presents the other side.

28
Aug

Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa in Hot Water Over … Water

villaraigosaLos Angeles is in the middle of a water crisis, and this is very serious business to hear Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa talk about it. Water rationing! Major fines for violations! The drought could last for years! As he intoned in February:

“The level of severity of this drought is something we haven’t seen since the early 1970s. We have to move quickly to address this problem,” Villaraigosa said at a news conference at City Hall.

But apparently it’s not serious enough that he’s willing to risk his lawn:

Although he tells the denizens of Los Angeles to cut down on their water use or face fines and higher bills, Mayor Villaraigosa’s city-owned mansion has had its lawn watered during illegal hours several times, NBC’s Joel Grover found in a month long investigation.

When approached by Grover, Villaraigosa said he would look into it. Sprinkler use is only legal on Mondays and Thursdays before 9 a.m. and after 4 p.m. NBC shows footage of sprinklers in use on days not allowed under the law.

What do you expect? That the mayor of a city he has nearly bankrupted should have dead grass in his front yard? Seriously, Angelenos, where are your priorities?

27
Aug

I’m Too Sexy for This… Britney Spears Concert???

If you can’t get your freak on at a Britney show…

According to Page Six, there’s a new name in restraint and public decorum:

There seems to be a double standard at Britney Spears’ concerts. During Tuesday’s packed show at Madison Square Garden, a spy tells Page Six that some fans were escorted from the aisles and taken into the hallway by security guards after being told they were dancing “too provocatively” at their seats. One of those yanked by guards, Sandra Ion, a Dramatics hair salon manager, said: “I guess there had been a complaint from someone in our section that our dancing was too risque. Meanwhile, Britney is onstage gyrating half-naked and singing ‘Get Naked.’ It was totally ridiculous. They should have just moved whoever complained instead of all of us.”

The Superficial has some pics from the concert, just to give you an idea of the tone these naughty young ladies were lowering.

And here’s where I wanted to post the video for “Toxic,” for a frame of reference on what’s “too provocative,” but I ended up preferring the re-creation somebody did in The Sims:

YouTube Preview Image

Sim-Britney’s acting is indistinguishable from the real thing! And her breasts are just as real.

(And yes, the headline was a Right Said Fred reference. For the old folks out there. Ahem.)

27
Aug

Mel Gibson’s ‘Model’ Girlfriend Sues Over Lingerie Photos

oksana-grigorieva-mel-gibsonMel Gibson’s soon-to-be trophy wife Oksana Grigorieva is landing herself an image problem. I’ve yet to see a favorable story printed about his pregnant mistress. (Probably because she has a habit of going after rich, older actors.)

This story isn’t going to be any different. She’s retained the services of a brass-knuckle law firm in Beverly Hills to limit the circulation of some photos of her in lingerie from her modeling days:

Oksana, pregnant by Mel, on Tuesday sued a man she claims sold photos of her in lingerie. The suit, filed by top Los Angeles firm Lavely & Singer, calls Oksana “an internationally renowned model, pianist and musical composer and performer.” (Quick, name one of her songs. Buzzzz. Time’s up. Sorry.)

The lawsuit claims Samuel Oriti met Oksana in 2004 and told her he was trying to negotiate a deal for her with a prominent lingerie company. She participated in a photo session, based on his representations the suit claims, and modeled lingerie. Oksana also claims she paid for the shoot and that Oriti promised not to distribute the photos elsewhere.

But…didn’t her lawyers just try to convince us that she is an “internationally renowned model”? Which is up for debate, as it’s not like 30-something moms are burning up the runways (Heidi Klum, as always, excluded). In fact, other than these underwear shots, I think it’s fair to say nobody’s seen her model before.

I’ve seen the pics and sure, they’re cheesy but it’s not like she’s naked (link SFW). I’m pretty sure you can’t sue people just because you’re embarrassed and your pockets suddenly got a whole lot deeper.

26
Aug

PETA Founder Wishes PETA Could Be Less Controversial

naked-peta-protestIngrid Newkirk sat down with Montel Williams yesterday to chat about the “Save the Whales” billboard you all know and love. She tried the “think of the children” rationale for proselytizing vegetarianism, which is bullcrap because the billboard also taught kids it’s OK to call fat beachgoers “whales.”

Montel tried to get Newkirk to admit that she was trying to get a reaction with this stupid message, but again, no dice:

MW: Ingrid, you have admit, come on, I’ve got it, you were controversial, you hit your home run, it went out of the park, I’m talking about it for three days. And the rest of America is going to keep talking about it. But the truth is, I think Joseph is right. Any child who would use that as a reason, or anybody who now says ‘those fat people are people who pick on animals,’ come on, we’ve got to slow down a little bit.

IN: I wish more than anything you can ever imagine that we could not be controversial, and we could not be provocative. I really do.

Really. Uh huh. Come on. Whatever, Ingrid. All PETA knows is the lowest common denominator, and here the freaking founder is saying she wishes they would tone it down. It’s not like she’s in charge or anything. But unfortunately, Newkirk’s selective memory appears to mean we can look forward to salacious stunts and naked celebrities for decades to come.

(Have to thank Jezebel for transcribing the interview, ’cause there’s no way my ears could take listening to those four minutes over and over.)




August 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • me: Gisele pisses me off for a variety of reasons,...
    • chrocs: Well, being pregnant is not an excuse to eating...
    • Emerson: Great, if you want to define “Real”...
    • Tom: SJSnarker, Yikes that is some stomach turning tax...
    • Imabear: While I enjoy food, I don’t consider...
    • Wow: John, because you’re being an obnoxious dick.
    • angry army wife: John, All the posts are delayed for...
    • John: I will ask again Why am I censored
    • John: why am i censored
    • John: “After this year, I think the Ed Block folks...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella