Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
06
Aug
09

Congress Hops On Board This Gravy Plane

private-jet-interorRemember not too long ago when Congress freaked out about auto execs riding in private jets? Members of Congress berated executives of General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler in committee hearings and the media. Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY) said:

“It’s almost like seeing a guy show up at the soup kitchen in a high hat and tuxedo.”

Well, Congress has decided they feel left out by not having their OWN private planes. Just before recess, the House approved almost $200 million for the Air Force to buy three private jets for Members of Congress. That kind of money is nothing when we’re looking at spending a trillion dollars on health care, so why not just throw in a few jets?

Everyone knows MOCs work so hard that they can’t possibly ride on a plane with us plebeians when they vacation to Hawaii. (Members of Congress are also known for showing up at soup kitchens in tuxedos, we just don’t talk about it.)  We the taxpayers sincerely apologize for ever expecting our high and mighty representatives to stoop to our level.

So thanks to Congress, Detroit auto-makers got their bailout and you got your airplanes. I guess everyone is happy. Except for us.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

47 Responses to “Congress Hops On Board This Gravy Plane”


  1. 1 Jannah Aug 6th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    Good article!

    Some atuo execs also got fired by Obama. Can we fire these knuckleheads too?

  2. 2 Christopher Aug 6th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    That is truely the point. Why can’t congress just mingle with us…the great unwashed? This goes for both sides of the isle. I’m going to write my congressman on this issue and see if he would use the plane. Being voted into congress is almost like hitting the lottery these days. Many forget this job is supposed to suck.

  3. 3 Pastafarian Aug 6th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    The Democrats in Congress are just like those pigs in “Animal Farm”.

    And I’m just like that giant muscular, handsome horse. No not Sarah Jessica Parker.

  4. 4 Angry Army Wife Aug 6th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    Or show up to a soup kitchen wearing $500 fugly shoes.

    It looks like someone beat me to the punch on this story. Passanger planes are good for us, but god forbid if someone from Congress has to mingle with their contiguents. I bet Pelosi still has her private jet. How much fuel does she burn?

  5. 5 Mack Aug 6th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    One would think that a representative would not call a dinner jacket by the plebeian term “tuxedo,” and that a top hat (or, as the honorable member says, a “high hat”) is not worn with a dinner jacket.

  6. 6 Freak Show Aug 6th, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    Why don’t we dig a little deeper and question WHY these same people who are trying to get this huge global warming bill through the Senate are chosing to buy and fly private jets?

    So WE have to cut back to save the planet but our elected officials get to fly privately? Seems to me that something is amiss….

  7. 7 TheIrish Aug 6th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Glad to see that the “People’s Party” is still sticking it to those self-righteous Republicans!

  8. 8 Angry Army Wife Aug 6th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Freakshow – welcome to the hypocracy that is our Democratic Party :)

  9. 9 Beige Aug 6th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Pasta, I’m writing “Mrs. Pastafarian” all OVER my Trapper Keeper. ;)

  10. 10 D--- Aug 6th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    I saw a special on this a while ago. They were going to be like mini-Air Force Ones

  11. 11 Minnow Aug 6th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Uh, Beige? That wouldn’t be a Dawson’s Creek Trapper Keeper, would it?

  12. 12 Pearce Aug 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    Curses! Beige has foiled me yet again!

    ….get off my lawn.

  13. 13 Aleric Aug 6th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Don’t worry guys, the people are starting to question their hard working, self sacrificing representitives in government. In fact many of them are meeting with their constituants in town halls and running like scared rabbits when the angry voters show up. Not to mention PEBO has started a snitch line to report any and all abuses of our brave elected officials. So the tables have finally turned.

  14. 14 Freak Show Aug 6th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    I’ve tended to believe we should more frequently oust the incumbent. Try to make sure the elected officials understand that they need to make sense or they’re gone.

    I’m free this weekend. Anybody wanna go incumbent ousting with me?

  15. 15 AllyKat Aug 6th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    Here’s another hypocritical move:

    “Post-racial” President nominates racist for Supreme Court, “Not-racist” Senate confirms her. It is good to know that my Virginian senators are just as racist as the senators of 50 years ago!

    They’ve just switched targets.

  16. 16 Koka Aug 6th, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    Hah, we can only wish. You know, they didn’t use any such US guvmint owned *special* plane to bring home those 2 women from N Korea…..Stephen Bing the Hollywood producer let them use his plane.

    Beige, don’t forget to write the “4ever” part……..lol

    Pearce, if we disguise ourselves as yard gnomes and wear pointy red hats can we stay on your lawn?

    Ya’ll have to excuse me, I’ve started some new migraine medicine this afternoon and it is some really good stuff. Look at all the pretty colors!!

  17. 17 Pearce Aug 6th, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    …pointy-hatted yard gnomes are always welcome. Along with those bright pink flamingos with the wings that spin with the breeze.

    Just none of those kids with their baggy pants and their devil music and their marijuana and their space ponies.

  18. 18 Stacey Aug 6th, 2009 at 10:34 pm

    OT – because I’m too lazy to open my email program to send this forehead smack in, http://perezhilton.com/2009-08-06-your-first-look-50. Heidi, the jeebus freak, proudly showing off her Playboy spread cover for this month. What a retarded hypocrite.

  19. 19 Beige Aug 7th, 2009 at 7:42 am

    These are some of the best comments, like, EVER. :)

    If Congress thinks they’re all too good to share a “health” “plan” with the flyovers, what makes any of us think they’d deign to travel the way the rest of us do? America may have been founded at least in part on the idea that royalty is bogus, but Congress, and especially The Anointed One, are working on overturning that.

  20. 20 Angry Army Wife Aug 7th, 2009 at 8:32 am

    Whatever. Like, John Hughes died yesterday.

    And I love the fact that Boxer said that these are “well dressed” people coming to shout at their representatives so it is a manufactured events. Really? Cause they just look like pissed off Americans who are upset that their government thinks they are a bunch of inbred, ignorant people who cannt think for themselves.

  21. 21 Angry Army Wife Aug 7th, 2009 at 9:23 am

    Update: $500 million for 8 planes. Sniff Sniff. What is that nasty smell. Oh, yeah. Hypocracy

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124960404730212955.html

  22. 22 Jenn Aug 7th, 2009 at 10:02 am

    not only can they not fly like the rest of us, none of them will sign up for the health care reform they are trying to shove down our throats. Disgusting pigs.

  23. 23 Angry Army Wife Aug 7th, 2009 at 10:15 am

    Jenn, why would they? They have amazing coverage and would only want our health care to suffer, not theirs

  24. 24 Christopher Aug 7th, 2009 at 11:00 am

    I read the Air Foce didn’t ask for the Gulfstreams. They asked for tankers in a different request. They frown upon going over budget for items they didn’t ask for because it will affect another aspect of the budget down the road…the US Air Force has better budgeting practices than the government.

  25. 25 Aleric Aug 7th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    My brother in law is a pilot in the Army, used to fly apaches now he shuttles the big brass around the world. He frequently comments on how the generals and their staff are happy to have a clean plane to get to places like Jabutie Africa and never complain that the aircraft he flys are sometimes 10 years old. I would much rather spend the money on better tranport craft for our soldiers and not to cart Nacny and her bunch around in luxury and style.

  26. 26 Angry Army Wife Aug 7th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Heck, Spend the money on ammo and armor for our troops. Oh that right. There is no longer a “war on terror”. I remember 9/11 and it is a WAR ON TERROR, dumbasses

  27. 27 RNB Aug 7th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    $200 million? Why does that number sound familiar? Oh, yeah! We could have bought another F-22 instead! But it’s more important that Nancy Pelosi not have to make a refueling stop in Kansas when jetting home for the weekend. Besides — like the talking points readers keep reminding us — ‘The Air Force doesn’t want those planes.’

  28. 28 Jannah Aug 7th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    You are so on target Pasta. Some are indeed more equal than others, and “the pigs are walking.”

    Great points everyone else, also! Too true Army Wife, did she expect us to come to the meetings barefoot and in rags?! Probably expected protesters to have missing teeth as well.

    :-p

  29. 29 AllyKat Aug 7th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    Heck, the Air Force doesn’t want to transport Congress. I’m sure they would rather Congress fly commercial, too.

    This reminds me of the stimulus money sent to Milwaukee for their school system for expansion. The same school system that is shedding students and has over a dozen empty schools. They didn’t even ASK for the money, but somehow it wound up in the stimulus bill.

  30. 30 Koka Aug 7th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    Jannah, you forgot the muumuus, wifebeaters, and the sponge rollers….evidently those darn protesters didn’t read the memo on dress code.

  31. 31 Mandamus Aug 7th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    In the interests of fairness I feel that I must point out that the more they are provided for legally(as galling as it might be sometimes), the less susceptible they might be to bribery from other parties.

  32. 32 Minnow Aug 7th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    If that’s the case Mandamus, let’s give ‘em all free hooker vouchers too.

  33. 33 Beige Aug 7th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    @Minnow–that was included in the porkulus bill. So to speak. You know, the one that was posted in its gajillion-page entirety, for something like 15 minutes?

  34. 34 Mandamus Aug 7th, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    Hey, if free hooker vouchers kept them clean from lobbyist and corporate special interest influence wouldn’t that be worth it?

  35. 35 Pastafarian Aug 7th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    Free hooker vouchers?! Finally a bill I can get behind!

    **sits in the corner**

  36. 36 Angry Army Wife Aug 7th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    Thing is about those lobbyist, the same ones that Obama did not like, he hired. go figure. The Messiah was on TV AGAIN the other day spouting nonsense about passing the first bill with no pork or wasteful spending in it. Seriously? What about the $30 million to save a mouse in SF. How does that stimulate the economy?

  37. 37 jimmy Aug 7th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    Gee I was feeling kinda good because I was shopping around for a used Gulfstream III. Maybe congress can buy some of the automakers planes.

  38. 38 Minnow Aug 7th, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    Maybe congress can buy some of the automakers planes.

    ‘cept most of the automakers RENTED theirs…

  39. 39 Jannah Aug 7th, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    Oh man, Koka, I’m gettin’ me summa them sponge rollers! X-D

  40. 40 Vince Aug 7th, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    “Hey, if free hooker vouchers kept them clean from lobbyist and corporate special interest influence wouldn’t that be worth it?”

    —–

    There’s a simple way to keep corporate special interests out. Separate Business from State and State from Business.

    But that’ll never happen. Government won’t give up its regulatory authority. What the anti-corporate mindset really wants is to keep Business out of Government while keeping Government *IN* Business.

    As it is, I’m much more concerned about non-corporate special interests, such as the NAACP, NOW, Emily’s List, PETA, AFL-CIO, and other various whiny “disadvantaged” groups out there. After all, there’s tremendous power in being a victim these days.

  41. 41 Koka Aug 7th, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    Yeah..everybody is listening to those whiny nutbunnies and not to the real victims….the average John and Jane Doe who is being told to either swallow it or choke on it.

    Jannah, I’ll meet ya at Sally’s Beauty Supply and we’ll get us some of those pink sponge rollers….LOL…….then at the next protest we can show up and stand our ground.

    The rest of ya’ll are invited too, only none of you guys wear baggy shorts. Pearce doesn’t like them.

  42. 42 Jenn Aug 8th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    Looks like this group from Congress road the ‘gravy plane’ all the way to the Antarctic on our dime. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124967502810515267.html

  43. 43 AllyKat Aug 8th, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    Because nothing stops “climate change” in the Antarctic like flying there on a plane!!

  44. 44 Beige Aug 9th, 2009 at 6:47 am

    Vince–you’re absolutely right. Except, add SEIU to that list.

  45. 45 Anna Aug 10th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    I know we already sent them tea bags in the mail, but can we actually teabag hypocritical congresspeople? I’d pay extra taxes to see that. They won’t let us in the White House to speak directly to Our Glorious Leader (he hates it when the unwashed masses trample his lawn) but I’d really love to hear your ideas for pestering his sycophants and shoe shiners. Protest GO!

  46. 46 Beige Aug 10th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    Anna, Bill Maher says you’re stupid. He says we’re ALL stupid, actually. Because his SAG card means he wouldn’t be subject to a lot of the crap we’d have to deal with, so the fact that we don’t like it means he’s smarter than us, neener neener.

    I’d suggest teabagging Maher, but something tells me that nothing would make him happier.

  47. 47 Freak Show Aug 11th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




August 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Emerson: Great, if you want to define “Real”...
    • Tom: SJSnarker, Yikes that is some stomach turning tax...
    • Imabear: While I enjoy food, I don’t consider...
    • Wow: John, because you’re being an obnoxious dick.
    • angry army wife: John, All the posts are delayed for...
    • John: I will ask again Why am I censored
    • John: why am i censored
    • John: “After this year, I think the Ed Block folks...
    • John: After this year, I think the Ed Block folks may...
    • jenny: @Pearce….. So sad for your loss. My...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella