Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
23
Sep
09

Julia Roberts Bars the Door at a Hindu Retreat

julia-roberts-EPL-setJulia Roberts arrived in India over the weekend to great fanfare, preparing to film the Indian segments of Eat, Pray, Love. In fact, it sounds like she got really into it:

Hindus have applauded the makers of Hollywood movie “Eat, Pray, Love” and its star Julia Roberts for reportedly launching the India leg of the shooting with a hawan (a fire sacrifice). …

Oscar winner Roberts participated with her four-and-a-half-year-old twins-Hazel and Phinnaeus-and two year old Henry, and she also joined in langar (mass lunch), reports suggest.

On the first day’s shooting, Roberts wore ruddraksh (seeds of the tree Eleocarpus ganitrus) mala (rosary), black salvar (a kind of trousers), purple kurta (loose-fitting upper garment) and ate matar-panir (peas-cheese), aloo-gobhi (potato-cauliflower), rice and chapati (Indian thin bread) with her bare hands and found Gulab-Jamun (an Indian sweetmeat) her favorite.

So I can understand why those same locals are pissed now that she rolled in — 350 bodyguards deep — to film in a Hindu temple during their holy days.

JULIA ROBERTS has upset locals by surrounding herself with 350 security guards while she films in India.

Villagers say bouncers are barring them from their temple at a Hindu retreat where Eat, Pray, Love is being shot.

One disappointed worshipper said: “It’s the holiest time of the year and we must not be stopped from visiting our own temple.”

But a cop said: “Nobody can breach the cover. We have strict instructions.”

Which means: No worshiping for you! It sounds like she got the “eat” part down cold, but the “pray” and the “love” could use some work.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

29 Responses to “Julia Roberts Bars the Door at a Hindu Retreat”


  1. 1 Hurricane Sep 23rd, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    I am so SICK and TIRED of all the little people constantly complaining about how they are inconvenienced by being forced out of their neighborhoods, restaurants, houses of worship etc…

    Don’t they know the stars are all better than us? Don’t they know we should be bowing at their feet instead of complaining about them?

  2. 2 Beige Sep 23rd, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    Dear Julia,

    Nobody who looks THAT much like a Muppet needs 350 bodyguards. Yeah, we get it, you’re all about the common touch, unless commoners try to actually…y’know…touch you. Or infringe on your sacred 150-foot radius.

    You’re from fargin’ SMYRNA, GEORGIA, you fugly bitch. Extract that stick from your ass, and use it to pole-vault RIGHT OVER YOUR DAMN SELF.

  3. 3 Freak Show Sep 23rd, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    350 bodyguards? I guess you can never have too much overkill….

  4. 4 Toubrouk Sep 23rd, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    I just can’t wait for the fakey, two-cent syrupy spirituality that will leaks from that bloated movie. I love the whole concept; block those who have genuine spirituality to worship so that big movie productions can sell their hokey McCrap version of spirituality for the price of a theatre ticket.

    Pure Gold Vs. Gold Pleated Tin. Hypocrisy always looks good with a spiritual touch.

  5. 5 jenn Sep 23rd, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    She’s perfect for this book – self-centered and self absorbed just like author Elizabeth Gilbert.
    I will definitely miss this one.

  6. 6 Dee Sep 23rd, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    I think it’s ridiculous that the people that LIVE there can’t use their own house of worship.. just curious though, did someone not remember the holy days when they gave permission for the movie to film?

  7. 7 Angry Army Wife Sep 23rd, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    350 bodyguards? Do the people who live there even know who she is? Her money is better spent on maybe building schools or providing to the poor, not on 350 people to guard her.

  8. 8 Aleric Sep 23rd, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    Are you serious that she had 350 body guards?? That is almost a Company in todays modern army. Who thinks they are that inportant that they need a Company of armed men to protect them?

  9. 9 Aleric Sep 23rd, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    Oops menat to say Batallion not Company.

  10. 10 Mermaid Sep 23rd, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Aleric said:
    Are you serious that she had 350 body guards?? That is almost a Company in todays modern army

    Really, and in India too – with all those vegetarian weaklings who can probably be knocked down with one good kick from a meat eater!

  11. 11 TheIrish Sep 23rd, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    Julia Roberts still makes movies? I thought she like died or retired or went back to her home planet.

  12. 12 Nimrod Sep 23rd, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    Is that Vin Diesel in that picture acting as one of her bodyguards? Three hundred and fifty of them could not only take over a Hindu temple, but any nearby cities as well. Without using guns.

  13. 13 Jrod Sep 23rd, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    350 Bodyguards? Looks like I won’t be hitting that…

  14. 14 Lilly Sep 23rd, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    Yum…gulab jamun….now I’m hungry. Ooh! I think I have gulab jamun mix in my pantry! Oh, sorry…I was woolgathering.

    Of course she won’t let anyone near her – they’ll get close and smell the stink of bullshit around her.

  15. 15 Beige Sep 23rd, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    Gaaah, this double-bagger is one of those celebs whose very faces just make me mad. She’s rather less talented than an 8-pack of tortillas, not quite pretty enough to be a centipede, and not quite sweet enough to be a rattlesnake. Julia Roberts makes Katherine Heigl look like Tinkerbell.

  16. 16 California Dave Sep 23rd, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    I agree with Dee. And didn’t anyone – ANYONE – from the production company check to make sure they wouldn’t offend anyone? Isn’t that the Hollywood mantra, that nobody be offended by ANYTHING?

  17. 17 Scott F. Sep 23rd, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    You know, I’ll probably take a lot of crap for this, but I don’t see the villain here being the Hollywood types.

    India is just the newest in a long long line of countries that is perfectly willing to take our money, then love to turn around and act like we’re the Worst People In The World(tm).

    Dave and Dee hit the nail on the head – someone had to give them the okay to shoot when they did, and the odds are that person knew perfectly well what week it was going to happen. Now, who should we really expect to know the details of a religious holiday? The people who live there, or the Hollywood people who don’t know anything beyond bottled water preferences?

    Frankly, the Indian people bitching about the Hollywood types is like my friend inviting me over to hang out on the same weekend as his wedding anniversary and his wife getting mad at ME for not knowing better. It’s HIS anniversary, so it’s kinda on him to be aware of it and work around it, and I as the innocent bystander probably expected him NOT to pick a time that would be a problem.

    Same applies here – their house, their rules – if they said it was alright, then you can’t blame the guests for being ‘insensitive’.

  18. 18 Koka Sep 23rd, 2009 at 9:58 pm

    Surprised me, too………..didn’t India sell out to become Bollywood?

  19. 19 Jessicarrot Sep 23rd, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    Well, I do believe that there is a holy day about every week in India. They were bound to get on someone’s nerves. And isn’t Gulab Jammun dessert? Fried syrup-soaked donut, right? You can’t go wrong there. I’m not a fan of Julia Roberts, but I hardly think she alone is to blame for the little snafu.

  20. 20 AllyKat Sep 24th, 2009 at 12:38 am

    I think people hit the nail on the head about the locals okaying filming during holy days. The part I am really wondering about is the 350 bodyguards. I don’t think there are that many people in the Pennsylvanian town my mom grew up in. Maybe somebody screwed up and added the zero in. Actually, 35 bodyguards seems like overkill, too. That’s more people than are in classes in my county’s school district. 350 people is almost half of my high school graduating class!

    And why does a Hindu retreat use a local temple? Shouldn’t they have their own private worship space?

  21. 21 Lilly Sep 24th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    Keep in mind, though – the locals in question are probably political officials, not the actual locals who would want to use the local temple. If my little town was being used to film a flick in the library, and I wanted to go in and was told “no you can’t” I’d get mad too. I didn’t give MY permission for these people to be in my library and keep me from using what is public property. I would be willing to bet that the majority of locals had no clue that they would be banned from their own public temple. Most likely the people in power in this area said okay and to hell with the locals – cause we’re getting paid!

    And, yeah, Gulab Jamun is a dessert – milk and cheese balls soaked in sweet rosewater syrup. They are delicious!

  22. 22 Lilly Sep 24th, 2009 at 11:16 am

    Dave – I thought the Hollywood mantra was “I have the money, therefore I’m better than these POOR people.”

  23. 23 Minnow Sep 24th, 2009 at 11:22 am

    I gotta sympathize with the temple goers here.

    But only because the film crew remaking Red Dawn totally screwed up my life yesterday.

    Yeah, ‘cuz Red Dawn was so damn good the first time…

  24. 24 MC Mom Sep 24th, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    Holy cow (so to speak), AllyKat, did you go to Ginormous Central High? My graduating class was maybe 320.

    Minnow, they’re remaking “Red Dawn” in Michigan? Are things really that bad up there?

  25. 25 Angry Army Wife Sep 24th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    Hey, Red Dawn was awesome – in the 1980’s. I hate the fact that they are remaking so many movies from the 80’s. Very disturbing.

  26. 26 Beige Sep 24th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    I’m sure the events in the remake of “Red Dawn” will ALL be chalked up to GWB and American chickens coming home to roost. Because we’re the locus of pure EVIL.

  27. 27 Angry Army Wife Sep 24th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    oh, of course. Cause Obama could do no wrong. Neither could Clinton. Even though he let Osama go on more than one occasion.

  28. 28 Minnow Sep 24th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    Are things really that bad up there?

    Well, let’s just say a commie invasion might be an improvement.

    The Reds have gotta be more organized than our current state Democrat overlords…

  29. 29 Pastafarian Sep 24th, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    350 bodyguards? I bet that’s more people than will actually see this piece of crap movie.

    I hope someone didn’t say that already because I’m not reading 27 comments. I’ve already wasted a day trying to think of Indian jokes that didn’t involve beads, whiskey, beaver pelts, and repeating rifles before I realized it was the other kind of Indian.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




September 2009
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Kelli: “Just like animal abusers, many drug...
    • dooflotchie: Oh HELL no! I just hit that “Contact...
    • me: Gisele pisses me off for a variety of reasons,...
    • chrocs: Well, being pregnant is not an excuse to eating...
    • Emerson: Great, if you want to define “Real”...
    • Tom: SJSnarker, Yikes that is some stomach turning tax...
    • Imabear: While I enjoy food, I don’t consider...
    • Wow: John, because you’re being an obnoxious dick.
    • angry army wife: John, All the posts are delayed for...
    • John: I will ask again Why am I censored
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella