Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network

Archive for November, 2009

30
Nov

ABC Trades Boy-Kissing Adam Lambert for Girl-Beating Chris Brown

lambert-brownTaking a page from the MTV playbook, ABC has canceled American Idol runner-up and gay icon Adam Lambert’s scheduled appearance on Good Morning America after he kissed a male musician on live TV, yet booked a sitdown with convicted Rihanna face-breaker Chris Brown.

At least one person inside ABC acknowledges the problem in this scenario:

Brown will do a taped tell-all with Robin Roberts, followed by a performance of songs from his new album. But TV insiders say the appearance, slated to air the week after next, has outraged feminists and gay activists who wonder why a convicted girlfriend abuser is more palatable to the network than an openly gay man who broke no laws with his raunchy performance on the “American Music Awards.”

An ABC source said, “The network is giving a mixed message — that it doesn’t trust someone who shocked with an unpredictable show and a gay kiss, but then it is happy to go ahead with Chris Brown, who was convicted of felony assault.”

ABC News has insisted that Lambert’s sexual orientation did not play a role in its decision to pull the plug on his “GMA” appearance this week.

ABC insiders said they ruled the “American Idol” star’s sexed-up shenanigans on Sunday’s awards show — which included him groping a female dancer, kissing a male musician and shoving a male dancer’s face into his crotch — were inappropriate for morning TV. One said, “He was not canceled over a gay kiss. He showed himself to be unpredictable on live TV.”

As opposed to Chris Brown, who has only showed himself to be unpredictable in the front seat of a rental Lamborghini. And in most of his inappropriate defenses of his behavior since he pleaded guilty. But at least he didn’t kiss a boy!

(Hat tip to Jos at Feministing for her finely tuned bullcrap meter.)

30
Nov

Copenhagen? More Like Carbonhagen!

If you’ve been watching the network news lately, you haven’t heard a word about Climategate. Which might be one indication why nobody watches the network news anymore. But if you have access to this cool new thing called the Internet — which you do, right? — there’s all sorts of information about climate scientists faking evidence and stifling their critics, and about the frantic efforts to explain it all away by everyone with an investment in the idea that WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE FROM GLOBAL WARMING. It’s become a big business, all this Green stuff. So it’s only, ahem, natural that the people with a lot to lose are reluctant to admit the game is up.

That’s why the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen next week is going to be so much fun. The London Times has a good roundup of the various celebrity ecocrites flying around telling us not to fly around — Sheryl Crow, John Travolta, Harrison Ford, Oprah, Trudie Styler, U2, Chris Martin, Al Gore, Prince Charles, et al. — and also points out:

The Copenhagen summit next week will generate vast quantities of hot air. It will see 16,500 people coming in from 192 countries. That amounts to 41,000 tons of carbon dioxide, roughly the same as the carbon emissions of Morocco in 2006. Also, the organisers will lay 900 kilometres of computer cable and 50,000 square miles of carpet. More than 200,000 meals will be served and visitors will drink 200,000 cups of coffee — at least that will be organic.

When asked if the carbon footprint might have been reduced by turning Copenhagen into a video conference, a spokesman for the event said: “For such a major agreement, people need to meet together and negotiate face to face. We have delegates from all over the world. Video-conferencing systems are extremely useful, but they don’t match the personal touch. This is one of the main factors in having a good conference.”

This might make sense if there were anything to negotiate. But there isn’t. It’s a hoax. The only reason all these people need to widen their carbon footprints to attend this thing is that they want to be seen attending. They want you to watch them save the world. That’s probably why Obama finally decided to go. What good is being a selfless servant of mankind if nobody knows about it?

If they really thought what they were saying was true, they’d never take another airy-plane ride in their lives. Carbon offsets? Treehugga please. How many mango trees can you possibly plant to offset so much alleged environmental destruction? Not that you’re planting them yourself, of course. You’re donating a minuscule portion of your wealth to somebody who tells you they’re planting mango trees. Which gives you a sense of smug satisfaction as you jet all over the world telling people to stop getting to their jobs on time and seeing where they’re going at night.

The good news is that all these famous people can stop feeling guilty about living like human beings. You’re not really killing the polar bears, Leonardo DiCaprio. You can stop recycling your bathwater, Ed Begley. Seriously. Please stop recycling your bathwater. You have to be around other people.

Update: Commenter Vince asks, “Whatever happened to the Ozone Hole?”

Update: Ah, here’s what happened to the Ozone Hole… It’s fixing itself! Which is now bad, because it’ll cause more global warming or something. Whatever, just shut up and pay your taxes, rubes.

26
Nov

MTV Has The Black Eyed Peas, But No Fried Chicken?

As painful as it is to call attention to the “musical group” the Clipse, I am professionally obligated to call MTV out for their rudderless censorship policy.

In the most recent Clipse video called “Popular Demand,” viewers may be confused by what appears to be performers rapping in front of a blank restaurant marquee. What’s with the flat yellow paint, you ask? Deceiver delivers!

The Brokelyn blog first reported last week that MTV censored the name of the Brooklyn fast food joint in the video — the often vilified “Obama Fried Chicken.” When asked, MTV used the “someone else asked us to censor it, but we don’t remember who” excuse. (Really. They really used that excuse.)

Here are the censored and uncensored version of the video. Below are some screen shots so you don’t suffer (like I did) watching the actual videos.

MTV edited

MTV unedited

Feeling uncomfortable yet? MTV is known for censorship of various sorts. (Plenty of things are glazed over, and some randomly strong statements or images go untouched by the PTB’s.) Cable TV channels can’t protect us from stupid people any more than they can protect us from bad music, but MTV seems unable even to protect itself from its own double-standard.

Continue reading ‘MTV Has The Black Eyed Peas, But No Fried Chicken?’

25
Nov

We Are Thankful That So Many Famous People Are Phonies

For our readers overseas, the American “Thanksgiving” holiday is usually a time to sit around a table with relatives we seldom see, eat massive amounts of turkey and side dishes, and listen to grandma bitch about why no one ever calls, and how come Cindy was late to cousin Earl’s funeral, and if Jim just came out of the closet we’d all be much happier, thank-you-very-much.

Ah … good times.

DECEIVER-dot-com-GIBLET-CZAR

But you don’t come here for family moments that you’ll cherish for a lifetime. So here’s a Thanksgiving serving of Deceiver casserole for you Americans. Just so you’ll have something to talk about tomorrow besides Aunt Rachel’s botox.

You non-Americans, just play along like usual, ok?

Continue reading ‘We Are Thankful That So Many Famous People Are Phonies’

25
Nov

Ed Begley Jr. Smites Global Warming Unbelievers

If you’re one of the benighted few who still can’t comprehend that WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE FROM GLOBAL WARMING, part-time actor and full-time warming scold Ed Begley Jr. has got news for you:

YouTube Preview Image

Whew! Too bad Stuart Varney’s desk doesn’t have some sort of spittle-guard. Sounds like Ed Begley’s bridgework is made of 100% recyclable materials.

Now, on principle, there’s nothing wrong with the lifestyle Begley wants you to lead. Frugality and conservation and respect for the environment are self-evidently noble goals. But people like Begley have turned them into a sort of secular religion, which is why we see this zealous fury at the heretics and unbelievers who dare to challenge their most cherished beliefs.

Notice the phrase Begley keeps pounding on: “peer-reviewed.” Global warming is real and you can’t prove it isn’t and shut up shut up shut up, because it’s been peer-reviewed. Well, one of the most damning revelations so far in these Climategate e-mails is that AGW researchers have been conspiring to prevent anyone who disagrees with them from being published in peer-reviewed journals. They’re saying, “If you disagree with me, you’re not my peer, and therefore you deserve no review.” There’s even discussion of having editors fired for daring to publish articles critical of AGW.

They’ve fixed the fight. Any evidence that contradicts them is inherently illegitimate because it doesn’t appear in the appropriate publications — thanks to the very people being contradicted — and any publication that disagrees with them is inherently illegitimate. They’re claiming consensus because the dissenters simply don’t count. What’s scientific about that?

To put it in terms even Ed Begley could understand: It’s kind of like casting agents stereotyping an actor as an unlikable, intensely geeky jerk, and then being reluctant to give him good roles that don’t involve being a jerk who’s intensely geeky and unlikable. Don’t you hate that sort of groupthink? How can you stifle somebody’s career just because you can’t open your mind and admit you might be wrong?

I sympathize with the guy, though. What he’s going through right now… it must be what the Pope would be feeling if Jesus came back and did a duet with Adam Lambert. What do you do when your whole life is a lie?

25
Nov

Eva Mendes Renounces Fur, Still Absolutely Loves Leather

eva-mendes-fur-2You know the Oscar-worthy scripts aren’t exactly rolling in when Eva Mendes takes a starring role in a snuff film for PETA:

The sexy star admits she once wore fur to a Hollywood event, but she’ll never repeat her mistake.

And, by way of repenting, she’s hosting a new Internet expose about the fur industry.

The film includes the latest investigation of fur farms and markets in China, the world’s largest fur exporter.

Mendes tells WENN, “Millions of animals are killed for their pelts each year… I didn’t always know how animals were killed for their fur, and I even wore fur once myself.

“When I learned how cruel the fur industry is – and that there are no laws protecting these animals – I swore that I’d never wear it again. Please join me today as we go behind the scenes of the international fur trade, and find out how you can look glamorous without supporting animal suffering.”

Well first of all, she didn’t wear fur only “once.” Nice try, glamourpuss.

But more importantly, if it’s wrong to kill animals for their pelts, how does she explain her ongoing fascination with Ferragamo’s gathered leather hobo this fall? (Which is lined in moth-murdering silk, no less.) That Prada leather-and-lace bowler she carries would be the star of any serious bag-collector’s archives. And she totally rocked that jade green ostrich clutch by Bulgari in September. You know how you can tell it’s ostrich leather? You can see the nubs where the tanners tore out the bird’s feathers. Super animal friendly!

And have you seen this woman’s shoe collection? Giuseppe Zanotti, Christian Louboutin, and Brian Atwood have never met a cow they didn’t immediately want to turn into a stiletto.

Why is it so damn hard for PETA people to understand that leather is made the same way as fur?

24
Nov

Tai Babilonia Update (in case you like aging ice-grannies…)

Tai Babilonia skated at Rockefeller Center today, against wearing animal skin, or something.

And yes, those are leather skates. (Thanks to one intrepid Deceiver reader for reminding us to look.)

Tai-bab-skate1

Go here if you really must watch the video. I love the little girl who skates past her, does a double-take, and then keeps on skating. (Internal monologue: “It’s New York. You think I’m impressed?”)

Continue reading ‘Tai Babilonia Update (in case you like aging ice-grannies…)’

24
Nov

Demi Moore Insists It’s Her Real Body on W’s Cover

Demi Moore is at the center of a controversy surrounding her cover of W magazine’s newest issue, which was widely panned for what appeared to be a bad Photoshop job on her left hip.

Demi is not one to take any perceived criticism of her body lightly, so she immediately took to the Tweets to defend the reality of her emaciation with what she purported to be the unretouched version of the cover image:

demi-moore-twitter1

Then somebody figured out that not only was the image Photoshopped, it appeared to be a frankenphoto combining the body of a model on Balmain’s runway and Demi Moore’s ironed-out face. But is that enough to convince Demi Moore that she should drop the pretense? Of course not.

Continue reading ‘Demi Moore Insists It’s Her Real Body on W’s Cover’

24
Nov

Global Warming Enthusiasts Feel Chill Winds

If it were still possible for Al Gore’s knees to knock together, it would be happening right now. For years, the doughy doomsayer has made a fortune peddling the theory of anthropogenic global warming, while telling us all to shut up because his favorite scientists say so. Now the brainiacs who claim they’re saving the world are scrambling to save face.

Last week a huge file containing internal e-mails and data files from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was leaked onto the Internet. Keener minds than mine (sorry I can’t narrow it down more than that) are currently combing through it all, but as the Wall Street Journal reports:

Yet even a partial review of the emails is highly illuminating. In them, scientists appear to urge each other to present a “unified” view on the theory of man-made climate change while discussing the importance of the “common cause”; to advise each other on how to smooth over data so as not to compromise the favored hypothesis; to discuss ways to keep opposing views out of leading journals; and to give tips on how to “hide the decline” of temperature in certain inconvenient data.

Some of those mentioned in the emails have responded to our requests for comment by saying they must first chat with their lawyers. Others have offered legal threats and personal invective. Still others have said nothing at all. Those who have responded have insisted that the emails reveal nothing more than trivial data discrepancies and procedural debates.

Yet all of these nonresponses manage to underscore what may be the most revealing truth: That these scientists feel the public doesn’t have a right to know the basis for their climate-change predictions, even as their governments prepare staggeringly expensive legislation in response to them.

But… why would Al Gore lie? Could Leonardo DiCaprio really be so gullible?  Why are they trying to shake my faith in Gillian Anderson?

No word yet from President of the Environment Gore on Climategate — he’s still basking in the afterglow of his triumphant SNL cameo — but lesser-known weather-warriors like George Monbiot and Tim Flannery have suddenly forgotten their mantra of “The science is settled.” Whoops! Turns out science isn’t so scientific when you prevent or dismiss all efforts to duplicate your results.

Our leaders want us to stop living our lives, and to fund our own punishment, based on information from places like CRU. If that information is bad and the people providing it are dishonest, we have a right to know.

(Hat tip to Tim Blair)

Update: At the NYT’s Dot Earth blog, Andrew Revkin notes the controversy. With this caveat:

The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they won’t be posted here.

Hasn’t this guy ever heard of the Pentagon Papers?

23
Nov

Skater Tai Babilonia Bares Her Figure for PETA

UPDATE for you Farkers: You want the pics? You got ‘em. Click here, but don’t say we didn’t warn you.

tai-babiloniaIn what may be PETA’s most geriatric stunt yet, 1980 Olympics figure skater Tai Babilonia will be skating in the nude tomorrow to protest Santa Baby’s slipping of sables under the tree:

There will be no sequined costume for champion figure skater Tai Babilonia tomorrow — in fact, there will be no costume at all. As part of PETA’s iconic “Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” campaign, the two-time Olympian will skate on the ice rink at Rockefeller Center wearing just a tiny flesh-colored thong, and carrying a sign across her chest. The champion skater is stripping off to encourage shoppers to cross fur off their Black Friday shopping lists.

Deceiver readers in New York, you’ve been warned: Don’t go anywhere near Rockefeller Plaza tomorrow around 12:30. Unless you to see a naked 50-year-old former drug addict making a damn fool of herself, but in that case, you could just become a Pam Anderson groupie and call it a day.

Only thing is, Babilonia’s newfound commitment to animals doesn’t extend as far as Morton’s Steakhouse, since Robin Leach says she’s known to frequent the one in Las Vegas (sixth item):

If the bartender mixing signature cocktails at Morton’s Steakhouse looks slightly familiar, don’t be surprised to learn he is former pro ice-skating champion Keith Green. He starred in City Lights at the Flamingo, and in Le Ice at the Luxor and decided to stay in Vegas as a full-time resident. Previously he appeared on NBC’s Wide World of Sports and toured with Dorothy Hamill’s Nutcracker, and Torville and Dean’s Face the Music world tours. He serves up heavenly martinis with the speed of a skater when best friends Tai Babilonia and Randy Gardner drop by for drinks!

Her love of Morton’s may have come from a training diet endorsed by her longtime coach, who makes no secret of encouraging his clients to eat plenty of muscle-building beef.

And she may want to rethink her support of One Step Closer and AmFAR, both charities that raise money for research to prevent and treat HIV/AIDS. Because how does she think scientists develop such treatments? Fairy dust or animal testing?

Just sayin’, if she wants to get in with the PETA crowd, she ought to know what else they stand for.




November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • tammie: Vince is right, we will fry anything. Even...
    • CroppyBoy: With all due respect to the dead, Ms. Paltrow...
    • skippy: I think it’s acceptable to euthanize an...
    • skippy: Whenever a celebrity starts spouting off about...
    • skippy: This commercial has been irritating me, too....
    • bigmama: Eat less junk food and move more=best way to...
    • bigmama: I don’t care about Twilight so I have no...
    • Stan: They should put the used undies in a special pile...
    • Vince: South Carolina boy here, so I know my fried...
    • JollyGreenMidget: AllyKat, so right. If the PETArds value...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella