Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
20
Nov
09

Miley Cyrus Is 17 Going On Prostitution

miley_cyrus_elle_leather_boots

Happy 17th birthday, Miley! It’s time for the PedoBear to start the countdown ’til you’re legal, and you’re giving creeps good reason that they should keep an eye on that clock:

Miley Cyrus dressed as Julia Roberts’ “Pretty Woman” hooker character for an ’80s party to celebrate her 17th birthday Wednesday night. The teen star — recently criticized for pole dancing at the Teen Choice Awards — donned the sexy outfit and danced the night away at the Canal Room on West Broadway, where Constantine Maroulis and the cast of the Broadway hit “Rock of Ages” surprised Miley with a performance.

First of all, Pretty Woman came out in 1990, so fail on the ’80s theme.

Second, step away from the thigh-high boots! Even if they’ve been rebranded as “over-the-knee boots” by Christian Louboutin, dressing like a sex worker is decidedly inappropriate attire for a teenager who still claims that the whole pole-dancing thing this summer was wholesome entertainment.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

32 Responses to “Miley Cyrus Is 17 Going On Prostitution”


  1. 1 California Dave Nov 20th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    Well, gosh…if Hillary Duff can move on to Gossip Girl and a threesome on that wonderful wholesome show…

  2. 2 AllyKat Nov 20th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    No teenager (particularly minors) should be wearing those boots. They have one purpose: to make everyone who sees them think about the wearer in a sexual manner. I don’t think they’d be appropriate for someone that young over skinny jeans, let alone over pantyhose/tights/bare legs. That pose also has one purpose: to make everyone who sees it think about sex with the model on the table. It isn’t rocket science and it doesn’t require a dirty mind. The only people who would have a different thought are cannibals, who would think, mmm, dinner!

    Guess which thought Miley’s aiming for people to have.

    I guess the only girls who don’t whore themselves out are the ones who aren’t in the entertainment industry. So does the industry make or attract sluts? I know that sounds harsh, but you can’t tell me these girls are unaware of what they’re doing. They may not realize the long-term (or even short-term) consequences, but they know what constitutes as sexual behavior, even if they do try to make it seem normal/respectable with words like “sensual”. I wanted to look and dress cute when I was that age, and I wanted people to think I was attractive, and even sexy, but I knew there was a line between teenage sexy and skank sexy. And I would NEVER have dressed as a sex worker for anything.

    Where is this girl’s mother? Miley needs her butt kicked, and perhaps confined to a convent.

  3. 3 Pastafarian Nov 20th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    17 is perfectly legal here in Illinois. How do I know that? Shut up that’s how.

  4. 4 Bill Nov 20th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    Pasta,

    Yes, legal for, you know doin stuff. Not legal for all those guys typing “Miley Cyrus Nake..” into google.

  5. 5 Ln Nov 20th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    I guess she left Tennessee (Or what ever southern state she is supposed to be from) far far behind.

  6. 6 StrawberryGirl Nov 20th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Her kid sister dressed up like a dominitrix for Halloween. So I guess it runs in the family.

  7. 7 Mister Snitch Nov 20th, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    “First of all, Pretty Woman came out in 1990, so fail on the ’80s theme.”

    Well, NO. For example, if it was a contemporary-themed film released in 1970, it’s a 60’s film. Likewise, Pretty Woman was an 80’s film. What era did you think it reflected? The 90’s hadn’t HAPPENED yet.

  8. 8 Conrad Nov 20th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    One year to go! If she’s doing this kinda stuff now. I can imagine what she will be doing when she hits 18.
    Pant, pant.

  9. 9 Aleric Nov 20th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    The legal age of consent it 16 in Ky and I beleive TN but don’t flash them boobies across the country till they get another year older.

  10. 10 KittyChymira Nov 20th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    Pasta, you’re from good ol’ Illinois, too? Sorry, long time lurker. It’s true though, 17 is legal here.

    But seriously, look at it this way. By the time Lindsay Lohan is done being a public obscenity, Miley should be coming right in to her own! The indecency and idiocy need never stop! Ah, I think it makes me a bad person to think that, and then go “Oh, good, at least Deceiver will NEVER run out of stuff”. God I love reading this stuff, haha.

  11. 11 Pastafarian Nov 20th, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    Yep. Chicagoish area.

  12. 12 katie Nov 20th, 2009 at 11:17 pm

    i agree with alleykat. that’s just stupid. and i LOLed at: First of all, Pretty Woman came out in 1990, so fail on the ’80s theme.

    HAHAHA!

  13. 13 fallingstar Nov 21st, 2009 at 12:58 am

    Hey, Chicago-area here too. Miley is very boring looking to me. I thought she was an awkward looking kid when she first hit the scene. I don’t think she’ll ever be truly attractive. I predict a lot of plastic surgery in the near future. And a lot of drugs and alcohol, and Britney-style head shaving. Anyone who has a dad that creepy (and encouraging of dressing like a skank at ANY age) is permanently messed up.

  14. 14 Catharine Nov 21st, 2009 at 1:44 am

    I agree fallingstar! I mean, I shudder to think what my dad would have done if I had even thought about wearing that! It’s so weird to see dads encouraging it.

  15. 15 Pearce Nov 21st, 2009 at 2:46 am

    …my parents would’ve let me go out like that without a second thought. They would tease me about it (“What happened to the other half of your skirt?” etc.), but they pretty much didn’t care what I wore.

    Actually, I’ve seen much worse on much younger girls.

  16. 16 quigonkick Nov 21st, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    Only because I’ve gotta get some fight outta my system, 1990 was technically the last year of the 80’s. Sure, the numbers are different, but when one counts to 10, “0″ is not the first number you use… it’s “1″. This is why the first year of the new millennium was 2001 and not 2000. Same principle works in decades. Let me have this one, this is as close as I’m ever going to (want to) get in having a point that goes against you folks.

    There, I feel better now.

    “By the time Lindsay Lohan is done being a public obscenity, Miley should be coming right in to her own!”

    In other words, when Miley is a crusty centurion? Ewww…

  17. 17 Mister Snitch Nov 21st, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    Quigon:

    Agreed. Just FYI: The film was actually released in March 1990 – only 3 months into the year. Chances are, in fact, it was in the can entirely before the holidays (1989) and simply waiting for its release date. It’s almost certain that shooting, at least, had ended in 1989 and that only editing & printmaking remained for the new year.

  18. 18 Pastafarian Nov 21st, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    I actually think it takes a couple of years for the previous decade to end. Just watch a movie from like 1982 and all of the clothes are still disco, with silver high heels and stuff. Or maybe 1991 and you’ll see an occasional Members Only jacket. To be fair I guess a movie released in 1982 could’ve been filmed in ‘79 or something. Or maybe I don’t know what I’m talking about. Whatever.

    Take that, Silver jacket with Trans Am on the sleeve!

  19. 19 Mister Snitch Nov 21st, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    “I actually think it takes a couple of years for the previous decade to end.”

    Yes, it can take some time for the tenor of a decade to assert itself. The first decade of the New Millenium is nearly played out, and I’m still trying to figure out what the hell happened.

  20. 20 AllyKat Nov 21st, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    I think “what the hell happened” IS the tenor of the decade.

  21. 21 Ronin Nov 21st, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    “By the time Lindsay Lohan is done being a public obscenity, Miley should be coming right in to her own!”

    In other words, when Miley is a crusty centurion? Ewww…

    Like Lohan will live that long!

    This will end badly & I intend on watching it unfold here on deceiver.com. Thank you!

  22. 22 Jannah Nov 23rd, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    LOL, you guys kill me. X-D

    It doesn’t surprise me at all that a Disney teen like her would be copying Disney’s movie about a prostitute (Spin, Uncle Walty, spin!). So many women are so skewed about that movie anyway, they think that it’s really just a feel-good Cinderella story. One of my friends loved it, and I asked her, “Soooooo, if you can’t afford to send your daughter to college, you think that it’s OK for her to become a prostitute to pay for her tuition?” She replied, “Well…um…no…humph!” Roberts was also afraid to tell her family that she would be playing a hooker, so she just told them that she was making a Disney movie. See? It’s all OK. Meanwhile, impresssionable children are sent skipping sluttily down a rosy path to hellinnahandbasket.

    That’s how we end up with puppet feel-good politicians too, because people go for the surface gloss only and ignore the scary details underneath. Arg.

  23. 23 Owitzia Nov 23rd, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    I gotta wonder how Pretty Woman was pitched. “Well, you see we got this hooker that falls in love with her John, so it’s kinda like True Romance [ignoring the fact that True Romance was likely a later movie]. Except this one has a skeezy best friend character that tries to rape the hooker. It’s a feel good family movie.”

    That said, I do love me some Pretty Woman. I think what makes the movie work is the fact that we don’t actually see Julia doing any hooker-ing, so it’s easy to see her as a cute little Disney princess. Or maybe my love for Richard Gere helped me look past the ickiness of the concept.

  24. 24 Beige Nov 23rd, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    Julia Roberts = Bewigged shark.
    Richard Gere = Rodent-like mumbler.

    Roberts + Gere = Antidote to hotness, romance, or wanting to get scrumpy with anyone, anywhere, EVER.

  25. 25 MC Mom Nov 23rd, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    Beige, so I guess “Runaway Bride” didn’t do it for you either? ;-)

  26. 26 quigonkick Nov 24th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    Let’s settle thins 80s/90s thing once and for all… who has the home phone number of Mr. Al Gore? SURELY he’s know…

  27. 27 Beige Nov 24th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    The runaway bride didn’t run nearly far enough, and there should have been a tank on her scaly heels.

  28. 28 aquasia Dec 10th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    you guys should not be talkin about her she is doing better than yall yall juust jealous she did nothing to hurt noone mind your gbuisness and she will mind her buisness

  29. 29 Beige Dec 10th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    Don’t you have a spelling test to study for? Because, DAMN. I’ve got houseplants who can frame–and type–better arguments than that.

  30. 30 Emma Dec 30th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    Don’t you girls see what this girl is doing!!!?!?
    Because of what she does the way she acts and what she wears, she has given all teenage girls a sterotype!! Apparantly we all do what she does and dress the way she dresses, I for one do not dress like this, and it’s not fair we are getting labelled as sluts because of how she acts! Apparantly all teenage girls take pictures of themselves naked and in their bra and nickers and put it over the Internet. I do not know 1 girl that does that!!!!
    It’s not fair on us, and her 5 YEAR OLD fans that look up to her and she is setting this example to them. Yea it’s okay to dress like a slut infront of the queen, and it’s okay to take pictures of yourself with basically nothing on(sarcastic). I can’t stand this girl. She’s going to end up like Britney, but the bad way she is known for.

  31. 31 sarah Feb 19th, 2010 at 6:30 pm

    … you know this same argument about skanky teenage rolemodels and girls dressing slutty has been going on since my mom was a teenager?

  32. 32 Beige Feb 19th, 2010 at 10:05 pm

    True, sarah, but these days they really ARE slutty-dressing skanks. ;)

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Pearce: fallingstar, I’m 6′, 125 lbs, and...
    • Mfrag: Sadly to me it looks like she had a stroke in that...
    • Hurricane: “Help me! I’m melting! I’m...
    • chrocs: “Rumor has it Chris Martin has become as...
    • Fortunate_Son: I suggest all his coworkers immediately...
    • Fortunate_Son: I hope she washed her hands and utensils...
    • demonterius: i food fried chicken
    • Fortunate_Son: I must say that Holly is a true industry...
    • flirt: From the looks of her in that picture she...
    • Cari Bean: @ Stan: *snort* *chuckle* How right you are.
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella