24
Nov
09

Demi Moore Insists It’s Her Real Body on W’s Cover

Demi Moore is at the center of a controversy surrounding her cover of W magazine’s newest issue, which was widely panned for what appeared to be a bad Photoshop job on her left hip.

Demi is not one to take any perceived criticism of her body lightly, so she immediately took to the Tweets to defend the reality of her emaciation with what she purported to be the unretouched version of the cover image:

demi-moore-twitter1

Then somebody figured out that not only was the image Photoshopped, it appeared to be a frankenphoto combining the body of a model on Balmain’s runway and Demi Moore’s ironed-out face. But is that enough to convince Demi Moore that she should drop the pretense? Of course not.

She gobbled up the “you can never be too rich or too thin” compliment from a Twitter follower:

demi-moore-twitter2

And then affected outrage when someone accused her of playing along with the lie:

demi-moore-twitter3

So how, again, does she explain this?

Demi-Moore-Anja-Rubik

We’re still waiting for Demi’s explanation of that amazing coincidence. Seems like she better make damn sure that’s her “actual shape” and not someone else’s before she starts accusing the media of bullshitting the public.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:


16 Responses to “Demi Moore Insists It’s Her Real Body on W’s Cover”


  1. 1 Minnow Nov 24th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    Dang, AllyKat!

    All our off topic ramblings are hereby justified! ;)

  2. 2 Angry Army Wife Nov 24th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    Wow, she has a twin!

  3. 3 Ln Nov 24th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    OMG How did that model on the runway use Demi’s body? Wow they really have come a long way with science and stuff. I am so glad Demi got her head back on straight after the switch, ‘cuz in the cartoons it can get messy.

  4. 4 Beige Nov 24th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    Pssst…Demi, honey? The word isn’t “thin”. It’s “desiccated”. I’d offer you a thesaurus, but it’d probably snap your little armbone thingies. You’re welcome.

  5. 5 Catharine Nov 24th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    Dude why would you WANT to claim that body was yours?? Sorry to the supermodel in question but to me her body looks horrific. Unless you’re going for ‘death-camp’ chic.

  6. 6 AllyKat Nov 24th, 2009 at 8:19 pm

    The full dress looks like a loincloth gone wrong…

    You could cut glass with some of those protruding bones. I’ve been REALLY skinny, but I don’t think I ever looked like that. She looks like she needs to be hospitalized, like if she tried to eat regular food her body would reject it. Somebody tell the models that they would look prettier with several more pounds.

    The fact that the torsos match up so perfectly kind of ruins Demi’s argument. All hail Minnow’s fab Photoshopping spotting skills! She called it. :)

  7. 7 Fortunate_Son Nov 24th, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    LOL. So did John Edwards write this denial?

    Yes, your hips were not touched or retouched,

    In fact, they weren’t even photographed, rather, they were completely replaced!

    Here is the original image people my hips were not touched don’t let these people bullxxxx you!

  8. 8 Mister Snitch Nov 25th, 2009 at 12:57 am

    Yeah, OK. She’s a hypocrite, her claim’s transparently bogus, she’s vain, yadda yadda. But she’s in a business with no place for old women. Probably there should be an intervention, friends and family confronting her with copies of that cover, urging her to quit. That’s a graphic cry for help, is what that is.

  9. 9 katie Nov 25th, 2009 at 6:44 am

    seriously demi, get off twitter and get a life. please. seems thats all she does is tweet crap (i read about it on here and on a few other celeb gossip sites) she’s a little old for that but ok!

  10. 10 ShyAsrai Nov 25th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    it looks as though any photoshopping that occured was done to rub out the BONY protrusions of the model.

    whether or not it’s a complete switch, neither body is demi’s real body. nor is that her ‘real’ face.

    that being said, if i had the money, i’d be a ‘plastique’ woman, joyfully having myself tucked, sucked, lifted, stretched, sanded and pinned!

    alas, it has ever been the fate of aging women to be set aside in favor of the nubile, young & fresh, even if the older is vastly and objectively prettier, more attractive than the younger.

    fair? no. true? yes.

  11. 11 Robin Nov 25th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    Demi Moore = Dan Rather

  12. 12 All Women Stalker Dec 21st, 2009 at 9:23 am

    Whoa! This is very shocking! Especially about that composite of Demi Moore’s body and the model’s. What was she thinking?

    -Denise

  1. 1 Demi Moore's W magazine controversy | My Fashion Life | Demi Moore Celebrity Monitor Pingback on Nov 26th, 2009 at 8:07 am
  2. 2 Demi Moore Lashes Out at Twitterer Who Calls Her Old at Deceiver.com Pingback on Dec 18th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
  3. 3 Demi Moore and Photoshop of Horrors: It’s Getting Ugly at Deceiver.com Pingback on Dec 22nd, 2009 at 7:13 pm
  4. 4 Wanted: The Truth About Demi Moore’s Photoshopping at Deceiver.com Pingback on Jan 22nd, 2010 at 1:58 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!



Report a hypocrite* at
tips@deceiver.com



* Famous people only. We don't care about your two-timing ex, nosy neighbor, or belligerent boss.


Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Clownfish: Interesting article on Julian Assange’s...
    • James Woods: How does $379,000 match $500,000?...
    • James Woods: I can’t even understand what he was...
    • James Woods: This ties into local governments demanding...
    • James Woods: Peta and the pornstar aren’t worthy of...
    • sex: very muscular body, I really liked having a...
    • Drastic: When does “editorial oversight” end...
    • RNB: ‘Shield.’ S-H-I-E-L-D....
    • Jenn: Heh heh Vince… good one.
    • Vince: Is there an echo in here?
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • “I also really appreciate reading the comments left by Deceiver regulars. I rarely comment myself, but I'm a daily reader. Sometimes I feel like this is the only ‘place’ in the world where people make any sense at all.”

      – reader fallingstar
    • “The running list of PETA faux pas is so long, I've had friends tell me they are funded by special interest groups interested in making vegetarians look ridiculous (I'm not kidding). Read Deceiver.com's hilarious dissection of PETA's latest officious blunder.”

      – blogger Mark Sisson
    • “Look, you have a point deceiver… but you do it in the most douchebaggy way possible.”

    • “I just want to say thanks to the writing staff of both the articles and comments here. You guys keep my sides sore and have collective wit that has more bite than a chinese buffet. The humor delivered at the expense of those who deserve it is almost too much to handle at once. This site cannot possibly be real.”

      – reader quigonkick
    • “If you want to get up to speed on the [John Edwards] accusations and see the supporting materials, the best place I've seen everything laid out so far is on the gossipy blog Deceiver.com. I wish it were Talking Points Memo or Raw Story but nope; Deceiver is all over it.”

      – blogger Lee Stranahan