10
Dec
09

Hop on the Copenhagen Bus! Or Don’t.

Did you know the delegates at Copenhagen have their own bus? Do you have any idea how lonely the driver is?

YouTube Preview Image

“We’re standing at the abyss! Mankind is doomed if we don’t do something right now! Um… as long as it doesn’t interfere with my personal convenience and comfort.” At least that guy in the clown car was committed to the concept, if not his own dignity.

There’s so much going on with Climategate that it’s hard to keep up, you guys!

You’d think these guys would be happy that we’re all gonna be okay. But then they wouldn’t have such a convenient excuse to boss us around.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:


27 Responses to “Hop on the Copenhagen Bus! Or Don’t.”


  1. 1 California Dave Dec 10th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    CO2 is a dangerous pollutant…which is emitted by every mammal on the planet.

    Solution: we need to kill ourselves and all the other mammals. Including whales.

  2. 2 Swede0319 Dec 10th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    Dave, that’s what the eco-nazis and the PeTards want. Why fall for their devious and cunning plan?

  3. 3 Pearce Dec 10th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    If that’s really what they want, they should set and example and kill themselves first. Martyrs for their cause, songs sung in Valhalla, and whatnot.

  4. 4 Kristine Dec 10th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    Yeah, let them drink the KoolAid first…

  5. 5 Pastafarian Dec 10th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    I’m not watching a video that has Beatles music in it. So I’ll take your word for it.

  6. 6 Beige Dec 10th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    You’ll notice that all those claiming that people are bad for the earth generally refuse to shut up and off themselves. It’s a case of “I wish I were dead. No, wait. Not me, YOU.”

  7. 7 mfrag Dec 10th, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    Boss us around and take our money. >:P

  8. 8 Vince Dec 10th, 2009 at 10:12 pm

    Something that really bothers me about the whole Climategate scandal is this:

    Just what other scientific declarations have been based on bogus “facts” and fudged numbers that we don’t know about? From AIDS to cancer research to any number of other scientific theories, how many of them may in fact have been based on data that was manipulated behind some closed door that the public doesn’t know about?

    It’s truly a scary thought. We just assumed that the scientists wouldn’t mislead us, but Climategate has demonstrated otherwise.

    In what other areas have they possibly misled us?

  9. 9 Pastafarian Dec 10th, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    Bigfoot?

  10. 10 Eve Dec 10th, 2009 at 11:25 pm

    Vince, check out Ben Stein’s documentary “Expelled,” about academics and teachers who were blackballed and/or fired over intelligent design: some of them weren’t even proponents of ID, they were merely perceived as being favorable toward it. Regardless of one’s opinion on the topic, the film is worth seeing just as proof that the system is broken and can screw you over very, very badly.

  11. 11 Catharine Dec 11th, 2009 at 12:27 am

    I love how idiots plunk the word ‘science’ into an argument to make themselves look smart. Their biased, ignorant opinions need validation, so they use a big word that will make people sit up and take note! Guess what Al Gore? Science is a vast, complex,and ever-changing field. You can rarely (if ever) say that science is settled! If it’s settled, you’re probably not doing it right. Oh wait. . .

  12. 12 California Dave Dec 11th, 2009 at 12:28 am

    Besides, can you picture these idiots on a bus?

    “Ninety-nine bottles of CO2 on the wall, ninety-nine bottle of CO2…if one of the bottles should happen to fall, OMG WE’RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!”

  13. 13 AllyKat Dec 11th, 2009 at 1:46 am

    I like how a couple thousand scientists in England agree with AGW, they get huge media coverage. Thirty thousand scientists sign a petition disagreeing (I think a school in Oregon sponsored it), barely a blip on the news. Good to know who counts.

    I am seriously bothered that the so-called scientists deliberately manipulated data, lied, sought to influence independent peer journals and otherwise behaved dishonestly and unethically (if not illegally). Shouldn’t there be some sort of sanctions put in place by scientific associations and bodies? Why would anyone want to taint their professionalism and credibility by supporting these tools? As a bio major, I’m embarrassed to be considering a RELATED field. I guess that people really are deluded if they think such behavior should be overlooked.

  14. 14 California Dave Dec 11th, 2009 at 5:30 am

    Shouldn’t there be some sort of sanctions put in place by scientific associations and bodies? Why would anyone want to taint their professionalism and credibility by supporting these tools?

    Because the evil scientists (BOO!) control Ed Begley Jr.’s “peer review”. If you don’t agree with the evil scientists (BOO!), then you don’t get to have your opinions published and you get run out of your field on a rail.

    Basically, we’re back in high school and the evil scientists (BOO!) [sorry, watching Bugs Bunny again] are the Rich Popular Bastards Who Will Ruin Your Life For Fun Because They Can.

  15. 15 Ln Dec 11th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    I have come to the conclusion the evil scientists are the same people who keep telling us that being a size 4 is fat and men prefer well busty women. Liars I tell you…evil liars :0)

  16. 16 Beige Dec 11th, 2009 at 9:38 am

    Forgive my vagueness on this, but remember a couple of years ago, when that scientist in South Korea faked his results on some sort of stem-cell research and was roundly condemned/burned in effigy/regarded as being almost as bad as Bush? WHY ISN’T THAT HAPPENING NOW?!?

    I was always taught that science is about honest, open-ended inquiry and discovery. Turns out, scientists use “facts” like drunks use lampposts: For support, not illumination. They start out with the conclusion they want to reach, and work backwards from there.

  17. 17 quigonkick Dec 11th, 2009 at 10:34 am

    “I was always taught that science is about honest, open-ended inquiry and discovery. Turns out, scientists use “facts” like drunks use lampposts: For support, not illumination.”

    Quite possibly the most brilliant ANYTHING I’ve ever read in my life.

    Thank you!

  18. 18 Bill Dec 11th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    “and men prefer well busty women. “… Um…

    And Beige, that’s a great analogy. Probably because it’s a double analogy, or something, I don’t know, I’m only 1/10 of the way through my morning coffee and my brain hasn’t turned on yet.

  19. 19 jenn Dec 11th, 2009 at 11:35 am

    Beige, That is a good question. Stem cell research certainly has a political angle to it. Just not as exciting as saving the earth for the eco-celebs of the world.

  20. 20 Pearce Dec 11th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Pasta,

    Bigfoot is a crucial part of the ecosystem, if he exists. So let’s all keep Bigfoot possibly alive for future generations, unless he doesn’t exist.

  21. 21 AllyKat Dec 11th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    We’d better put in some environmental protections for Bigfoot, just in case.

  22. 22 Beige Dec 11th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    AllyKat, I propose a stimulus package of roughly $971 billion. American. For the purpose of keeping Bigfoot in shampoo, heartworm pills, and Sasquatch porn.

  23. 23 fallingstar Dec 11th, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    And don’t forget about health care… Bigfoot needs health care… but we all have to pay for it.

  24. 24 Pearce Dec 12th, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    What if Bigfoot needs abortions?

  25. 25 Minnow Dec 14th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    We can pay for Bigfoot abortions with the money we used to spend on her mammograms.

  26. 26 Beige Dec 14th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    Bad news for Bigfoot, though: Only one child per, and once she/he is past 50, she’s toast. No longer contributing to society, y’know.

  27. 27 uggone Jan 6th, 2010 at 10:13 pm

    Dave, that’s what the eco-nazis and the PeTards want. Why fall for their devious and cunning plan?

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!



Report a hypocrite* at
tips@deceiver.com



* Famous people only. We don't care about your two-timing ex, nosy neighbor, or belligerent boss.


Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Discordia: Elle, according imdb.com, he’s done hard...
    • Elle: Isn’t Trejo a one-time jailbird himself?
    • Fortunate_Son: Ounce of prevention beats a pound of cure....
    • O Face: I still think that Lohan was one of the few party...
    • Stan: Don’t forget what we discussed. Two inches...
    • Discordia: Trejo’s said that her only fault was...
    • ugh: Don’t teach teenagers about safe sex, and even...
    • California Dave: Rodriguez probably – and rightly...
    • vampirate: Don’t forget Elijah Wood and Seth Green.
    • Ronin: @BB I think part of the point is this is her...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • “I also really appreciate reading the comments left by Deceiver regulars. I rarely comment myself, but I'm a daily reader. Sometimes I feel like this is the only ‘place’ in the world where people make any sense at all.”

      – reader fallingstar
    • “The running list of PETA faux pas is so long, I've had friends tell me they are funded by special interest groups interested in making vegetarians look ridiculous (I'm not kidding). Read Deceiver.com's hilarious dissection of PETA's latest officious blunder.”

      – blogger Mark Sisson
    • “Look, you have a point deceiver… but you do it in the most douchebaggy way possible.”

    • “I just want to say thanks to the writing staff of both the articles and comments here. You guys keep my sides sore and have collective wit that has more bite than a chinese buffet. The humor delivered at the expense of those who deserve it is almost too much to handle at once. This site cannot possibly be real.”

      – reader quigonkick
    • “If you want to get up to speed on the [John Edwards] accusations and see the supporting materials, the best place I've seen everything laid out so far is on the gossipy blog Deceiver.com. I wish it were Talking Points Memo or Raw Story but nope; Deceiver is all over it.”

      – blogger Lee Stranahan