Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
06
Jan
10

Senator Sheldon and Troop Funding (Take 3?)

sheldonI loves me a good “before and after” when it comes our illustrious elected officials swine. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)–who must just hate the fact that no one would ever elect someone named “White House” to be president and live in the… oh, never mind. He had this to say on December 21:

The lowest of the low was the Republican vote against funding and supporting our troops in the field in a time of war. As a device to stall health care, they tried to stop the appropriation of funds for our soldiers. There is no excuse for that. From that there is no return.

Problem is, he got pretty “low” himself two years ago. Legal Insurrection did some leg work and found this:

In May 2007, Whitehouse was only one of 14 Senators to vote against the Iraq war funding supplemental to support the troop surge, at a time our troops were fighting al-Qaeda in the field in a time of war. Whitehouse also was one of 10 co-sponsors of a bill to cut off funding for the troops in Iraq unless troop withdrawals started within 120 days.

What a forgetful little Casablanca.

Before he slammed Republicans for voting against troop funding  last month (Which practically NO ONE denies was a gimmick to pass the health care bill, just sayin’), and before he voted against funding the troops in 2007, he played yet another angle in May 2006. According to OnTheIssues.com:

The bravery of our troops-so many from Rhode Island-has been extraordinary. But we cannot let their continued presence on the ground become the source of more security problems than they solve. We need to responsibly extricate ourselves from Iraq. And we need to resolve that never again will American troops go to battle without the body armor and protection they deserve. It’s not a parent’s job to outfit America’s soldiers. That’s what the President and Congress are supposed to do.

News flash Sheldon.  You are Congress.

Wait…..it’s not THAT Sheldon?

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

14 Responses to “Senator Sheldon and Troop Funding (Take 3?)”


  1. 1 Aleric Jan 6th, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    Clueless as always, and these same simpletons get re-elected every year.

    Except perhaps this year……..

  2. 2 Beige Jan 6th, 2010 at 5:23 pm

    Courtesy of the IMDb:

    Harry Burns: With whom did you have this great sex?
    Sally Albright: I’m not going to tell you that.
    Harry Burns: Fine, don’t tell me.
    Sally Albright: Shel Gordon.
    Harry Burns: Shel? Sheldon? No, no, you did not have great sex with Sheldon.
    Sally Albright: I did too.
    Harry Burns: No you didn’t. A Sheldon can do your income taxes, if you need a root canal, Sheldon’s your man… but humpin’ and pumpin’ is not Sheldon’s strong suit. It’s the name. ‘Do it to me Sheldon, you’re an animal Sheldon, ride me big Shel-don.’ Doesn’t work.

  3. 3 Mister Snitch Jan 6th, 2010 at 5:32 pm

    “no one would ever elect someone named “White House” to be president and live in the…”

    Well that WOULD be terribly confusing and probably would result in someone hitting The Big Red Button by mistake. That’s how these things happen.

    Now, THIS piece is a nice, neat example of hypocrisy. Democrat says the Rethuglicans were voting down money for the troops. Turns out he was doing exactly that his own self. Clear, straightforward, documented.

    Like Sgt. Friday always used to tell me: ‘Just the facts, ma’am.’ Though why he kept calling me ‘ma’am’ I’ll never know.

  4. 4 quigonkick Jan 6th, 2010 at 5:33 pm

    Off subject, but not really…

    Just a friendly reminder for everyone to remember that John Kerry WAAAAAY back saying he voted for troop funding before he voted against it. His NO vote was a protest against the war. I’m still waiting for his severed head to roll through my town… I owe it a kick or forty… I have boots just for the occasion.

    And these examples of hypocrisies are just from the spotlight whores who can’t keep their mouths shut. Imagine how many Congressmen simply labor within the shadows and wreak havoc that evades headlines. THOSE are the types that really need to go.

    LOVE the news about Pelos(k)i taking a dig at nObama. This is like watching a snake and a GIANT spider fight to the death: no matter what, someone’s gonna end up wounded and that’ll make the exterminator’s job that much easier.

  5. 5 Mister Snitch Jan 6th, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    “these same simpletons get re-elected every year”

    Well, we’re talking RI (Providence) politics here. It’s pretty much as corrupt as New Jersey, only a lot smaller. You gotta understand – and believe me, I KNOW – these pols are not so much ‘elected’ as they are ‘installed’.

  6. 6 All Women Stalker Jan 6th, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    Holy eff. I think he’s pretty confused about which side he’s on. Or what issues he’s supporting. I can’t believe someone like him is working for the government. Sad. Just sad.

  7. 7 Conrad Jan 7th, 2010 at 2:06 am

    Dickheads are always confused.

  8. 8 angry army wife Jan 7th, 2010 at 10:08 am

    and yet people keep re-electing idiots like this. I bet if they actually read stuff about their Congressmen and Senators they actually may vote based on what kind of person they are. Then again, that would mean that they actually care.

  9. 9 Bill Jan 7th, 2010 at 11:51 am

    I like the SNL sketch that has the Kerry-Bush debates. Kerry says “When talking to those that support the war, I support the war. When talking to those that oppose the war, I oppose the war. That’s not flip-flopping, that’s pandering.”

  10. 10 Pastafarian Jan 7th, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    That’s not a picture of the senator is it? And who else beside me knew that was a Shazam! shirt?

    Alright so I’m an idiot.

  11. 11 The Oversneer Jan 7th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @MisterSnitch — The “tips” e-mail is upward and to the right. And if you want to try your hand, we accept guest submissions.

  12. 12 Pastafarian Jan 7th, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    Really?! Guest submissions?! Ooooh baby!

  13. 13 Mojo Jan 7th, 2010 at 7:52 pm

    Being from RI we refer to him as Wheldon Shitehouse (thank Buddy Cianci), I can not stand this man! He only won because there were 3 parties running for that seat and the indie Chaffee stole the Repub votes.

  14. 14 White Debbie Jan 9th, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    Why on earth is it a picture of Sheldon from “Big Bang Theory?” I was so hoping he’d been busted wit a hooker!

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




January 2010
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Herandar: Sounds like Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman after...
    • Herandar: Worsworth: ‘I wandered lonely as a...
    • AllyKat: StrawberryGirl: That reminds me of a couple...
    • AllyKat: Why stop here? Let’s develop an app that...
    • rachellyn0205: but i guess, if drugs arent able to be...
    • LN: Yeah right, they were so happy that they had a trial...
    • Anna: Was the term “not family-friendly” the...
    • coa coa: Sarah I loved this blog. There is alot of truth...
    • Jannah: Farrah’s documented pain immediately came...
    • Pastafarian: You are golden Swede that’s a big 10-4.
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella