….because I want to stop writing about you. Seriously, I am tired of you. I mean, what thhhhhhhhhhsdjhdsfjhhhhhhhh
hxdfghhhhhhhhhhhhh
[twenty minutes later]
Crap, I just fell asleep on my key board… Sorry, guys.
Ms. Portman seems, like, sorta smart with all those languages she’s studied and that whole Hahvahd Yahd thing. And she’s sorta cute. And then she speaks. Every time, I swear, we get ourselves an “It’s alive!” moment.
In Portman’s most recent interview with Elle UK for February, which was accompanied by shots of Portman in lingerie/bustier/underpants, she’s vowing to keep her clothes on yet again:
“There was a lot of controversy about the whole Lolita thing,” she says in the interview. “My parents were super-protective about it, but I got a lot of weird letters. It was really upsetting. I didn’t want to be seen as a sex object, so I went in the opposite direction. I’m definitely not a prude about sex or nudity, I just don’t want to do something that will end up as a screen grab on a porn site.”
Let’s review, and yeah, I am gonna quote myself from November:
According to the Daily Mail, Ms. Portman will bare all again in Darren Aronofsky’s next film, Black Swan. Her excuse cop-out reason is that even though it is “a pretty serious sex scene, and a lesbian one at that,” she insists that “it’s not raunchy — it’s extreme.”
To be fair, she may have conducted the Elle interview before her promo interviews regarding her new upcoming movie Black Swan, where she discussed her nude scene with Mila Kunis.
A word to the wise: If you are a performer conducting interviews months in advance, your personal values are “flexible,” and you are prone to grotesque hyperbolic statements, keep a journal to track your morals from day to day. Then track when the interviews will be released, and then pontificate in the appropriate order.
Related posts:
- Natalie Portman and the Naked Truth Poor thing. Natalie Portman just can’t decide what she...
- Natalie Portman Thinks the Recession Is ‘Exciting’ Natalie Portman apparently lives locked in a beautiful ivory Harvard...
- Natalie Portman Loses Real-Life Game of Apples to Apples Natalie Portman needs to get her…um…values straight, or at least...
- And Speaking of British Vegans… A Stella McCartney Tribute You just know Heather Mills’s blood would boil if she...
- Lily Allen Won’t ‘Pick On’ Crazy Courtney Love…Much Ex-neo-Luddite and former (?) pop star Lily Allen is super...
Shush Audrey, anytime Natalie wants to take her clothes off is ok with me. In fact half the films I have seen her in were due to her lack of clothes and not necessarily the movie itself.
“I got a lot of weird letters…”
SHE NOTICED ME!!!!
The only thing she is good at, besides being a hypocrite, is being a Star Wars character.
Please pick stripping Please pick stripping Please pick stripping Please pick stripping Please pick stripping …
I never thought I’d say this, but I hope she picks stripping, too. That way, maybe we’ll be spared any further thespian stylings from this particular hootchie who can’t act her way out of a wet bag of fries.
And only in the entertainment industry would anybody attempt to persuade us, presumably with a straight face, that she “didn’t want to be seen as a sex object” while simultaneously posing for photos like those above? What, were those photos–and the roles described above–meant to convince us of her intellectual gravitas? Because it ain’t getting done, y’all. She’s pretty to look at, but that’s temporary. She’ll get uglier, but she won’t get smarter. Nor will she probably get MORE self-aware as time goes by, which means that her head will probably hurt a lot while her brain tries to fathom its own stupidity.
There’s an odd twinkle in her eyes…like the light is coming from within…probably the lights from the photoshoot shining into her ears…
“this particular hootchie who can’t act her way out of a wet bag of fries.”
——————————————————————-
How DARE YOU insult such wonderful, culinary delight….off to the corner with you!
Heh. I’m taking my Frosty with me, too.
Like I have said before,Natilie is like dating strippers, you aren’t taking them home for the conversation.
I’d don’t want either but if forced to choose I would say stripping because then I don’t have to listen to her.
Her statements aren’t hypocritical, as there is a difference between ‘the Lolita thing’ and the kind of pictures shown above. She’s just trying to find her way in a town that rewards and punishes female sexuality and I love how smart she is being about it.
Ummmm. . . . aren’t ‘raunchy’ and ‘extreme’ synonyms? You’d think someone with a Harvard education would know to use more distinct words!
But hey, whatever helps you sleep at night Natalie! Cause the difference between a ’sex object’ and ‘lesbian sex scene’ in Hollywood is. . .well. . .not much. But if that’s how you have to excuse your hypocrisy to yourself, you just go right on ahead!
Maybe she DID do well at Harvard. Most college classes really only require you to absorb material long enough to take the test, so as long as you go for an undergraduate degree in a liberal arts/social science major, you don’t actually NEED long term memory.
She probably thinks the pictures are “sensual” or “erotic”, not “sexy”. Though anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that all three describe pictures that men are going to use for their personal enjoyment.
Note to publishers of women’s magazines: Stop putting half naked girls on the covers. If you really want me to buy your stupid rag, give me a cover with a (good looking) shirtless man. Thank you.
Ohhh, the poor lost little lamb. Wandering all forlorn in prudish, uptight Hollywood. Maybe if she just goes ahead and does a few spread-beaver photoshoots, she’ll REALLY teach them something noble about their value system and about how powerful she is. Except, not really.
I agree with kristenbell. Especially if it’s THE kristenbell. I would believe anything kristenbell told me to believe. Because kristenbell is kristenbell.
kristenbell
kristenbell
kristenbell