Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
28
Jan
10

I Bet Bill Murray Won’t Be in the Sequel if the Groundhog is all CGI

America’s cutest, fuzziest group of terrorist sympathizers, PETA, is demanding that the most adorable weather forecaster in history be replaced with a robot.

That’s right. I said robot.

No, I’m not talking about Al Roker … hubba hubba amiright? Or should I say Hubba Bubba? (Hey, do they still make that gum?) Anyway…

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is requesting a robotic stand-in for the furry favorite of the beloved Groundhog Day festival known ’round the world. PETA says it’s unfair to keep Phil in captivity and then subject him to huge crowds and bright lights every Feb. 2.

William Deeley, president of the Inner Circle of the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club — once they finished the secret handshake and matched their power rings — said: “The groundhog is being treated better than the average child in Pennsylvania.”

Really? He probably should have phrased that better somehow.

But have no fear, Punka- … PunkyBrew- … Aw, Punxsawhatever Phil is kept in a climate-controlled environment and gets an annual inspection from the state Department of Agriculture. You know, kinda like your mom.

I bet some of those animals that were dumped behind the Piggly Wiggly wished they were robots.

Listen: I love animals as much as the next guy. Especially with ketchup. But the last thing I need to deal with when Skynet becomes aware is killer gophers. It’s gonna be enough hassle dealing with the Terminators as it is. Me and my muscular frame and dashing good looks can only battle one killer species at a time.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

14 Responses to “I Bet Bill Murray Won’t Be in the Sequel if the Groundhog is all CGI”


  1. 1 Toubrouk Jan 28th, 2010 at 5:44 pm

    Did it ever happen to everybody here? You go to sleep one night figuring that PeTA couldn’t go lower than porn stars and “Gangstas” to only notice than, overnight, those lunatics found shovels and dug their pretty deep hole a tad deeper?

    Damn, I need a support group…

  2. 2 angry army wife Jan 28th, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    My mom emailed me this article earlier and I could not believe it. What next PETA? SEriously? Phil? I think some people were not hugged enough as children.

  3. 3 Beige Jan 28th, 2010 at 6:03 pm

    You’d think that serious frowny-faced Saviors of Animalkind would have other things to deal with. Weren’t there, I don’t know, maybe some animals injured/killed/inconvenienced in Haiti or something? They’ve gotta worry about a FARGIN’ GROUNDHOG?

  4. 4 Stan Jan 28th, 2010 at 6:25 pm

    I would have believed them had they said the ground hog was being treated better than the average child in California. But they had to go for the gold and claim Pennsylvania. I’m with PETA on this one.

  5. 5 AllyKat Jan 28th, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    I considered sending this in for a tip. Does this mean Pasta and I share a brain?

    Phil wouldn’t know what to do with himself in the wild. Then again, PETA doesn’t know what to do with themselves in society, as evidenced by their increasingly weird demands.

  6. 6 Rocko Jan 28th, 2010 at 10:26 pm

    I’m actually surprised PeTA hasn’t done this before. But I really just wanted to comment to say Pasta, I like your writing style.

  7. 7 Menace Jan 28th, 2010 at 11:37 pm

    They do still make Hubba Bubba in increasingly strange flavors and colors. Here’s hoping they’re testing it on animals, looking for a better solution to the old gum-in-hair problem. I’d kill a panda for that.

  8. 8 AKS Jan 29th, 2010 at 12:15 am

    Pasta, I’m disappointed that you don’t comment on the posts you author to stridently disagree with the posts you author.

  9. 9 Pastafarian Jan 29th, 2010 at 1:13 am

    Thanks Rocko.

  10. 10 Conrad Jan 29th, 2010 at 9:31 pm

    PETA: People Eating Tasty Animals.

  11. 11 Kevin the Veteran Jan 30th, 2010 at 10:05 am

    PETA is hilarious!!
    I bet they sit around and play the Kevin Bacon Game to see how they can link the use of hand sanatizer with animal cruelty.

  12. 12 rob Jan 31st, 2010 at 12:51 am

    Lol, your move to consistent blogger on this site is awesome. I read your posts with a smile on my face.

  1. 1 Mother Teresa Not Fit For A Stamp? at Deceiver.com Pingback on Jan 29th, 2010 at 3:35 pm
  2. 2 PETA’s Superbowl Ad Picks: Do They Know What Real Dogs Look Like? at Deceiver.com Pingback on Feb 10th, 2010 at 1:31 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




January 2010
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • California Dave: Fried chicken is something I’ve...
    • Commander PopTart: Pearce, And round out that menu with a...
    • Pearce: Yeah, things that come in “tall”...
    • Pearce: Or you could go with the “lock yourself in...
    • Pearce: Someone should introduce her to fried Twinkies.
    • Claudia: Oh good Lord. Sterilizing animals is not cruel....
    • Claudia: Pearce — slightly off-topic, but Gap sells...
    • Claudia: It is annoying how “every shape” in...
    • Catharine: Ya know, I’m surprised PeTA...
    • David Maggard: Lets get it clear they feel animals are...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella