Gossip BlogAds Network Bargain BlogAds Network
04
Feb
10

Noah Cyrus is Roman Polanski-Approved!

Hooo Boy! Is that Roman Polanski joke played out yet? I sure hope not. Because, HAHA! Every time I hear it I laaaugh, and laaaugh.

Anyhoo… It appears that 9 is the new 32, as Miley’s kid sister is set to unveil her new lingerie line for little girls.

Yep. You read that right.

For kids.

Little Noah Cyrus will be teaming up with her best friend Emily Grace to launch a children’s lingerie collection for “Ohh! La, La! Couture.”

Holy crap! I hope it’s ready in time for Valentine’s Day! (I still have to do my shopping):

The company’s website describes The Emily Grace Collection as having a “trendy, sweet, yet edgy feel, reminiscent of Emily’s true personality. She is collaborating with Ooh! La, La! Couture designers to create versatile styles that can be worn with sweet ballerina slippers, funky sneakers or paired with lace stockings and boots for more of a rock and roll look. Emily’s collection will appeal not just to little girls – the line also has an exclusive Teen Collection available to a size 14.

I would hope against hope that lacy under-britches wouldn’t come in size 14 for anybody. But you try explaining that to your mom.

There was a video I was gonna link to, but — surprise, surprise — it comes up as “private.” Weird huh? I’d try to find it elsewhere but I’ll be lucky if I don’t have to clear this story with the judge as it is.

Oh, yeah. This is a blog about hypocrites, right? I’m going with Billy Ray Cyrus on this one. Just because.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Deceiver MadnessAnimal FilesPretenPol

22 Responses to “Noah Cyrus is Roman Polanski-Approved!”


  1. 1 Hurricane Feb 4th, 2010 at 8:54 pm

    I can’t, uh…what I mean is that….er, it has to be…..um…….

    Our culture is fucking sick.

    That’s all I got.

  2. 2 cara Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:09 pm

    Veto Disney. If you ever watched that channel or looked at the bathing suits they sell at Kmart for toddler girls and you would KNOW that Disney is absolutly trying to desexualize our youth. What I mean is they are not propagating sexuality as something to be valued and honored and cherished. I saw a toddler girl Little Mermaid bathing suit, if you could call it that, that looked like something a stripper would wear, so this is not a surprise. Shauna Sand will probably be designing some of those clear stripper heels next with a Tinkerbell on the heel!! I would not be surprised.

  3. 3 cara Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    I’d also like to say that what has happened here, RICH girls aspirering to “work the pole”!!!!!! I do not understand, Noah Cyrus’s parents have the $$$$$ to offer her THE best education she could ever dream of, same with Brook Hogan and yet what do these girls want to do? Work the pole. It was my parents goal to not have me ever go near a stripper pole. They would of shat if I even touched one. Isn’t that what parents do???

  4. 4 Beige Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:42 pm

    I know I’d drop cargo if either of my boys touched a stripper pole.

  5. 5 fallingstar Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:43 pm

    The website for “ooh la la couture” is currently down and I couldn’t find anything else on the intertubes about this lingerie business. I found another story that says this lingerie business is just a rumor started by perez… I sure hope so. Lingerie for 9-year-olds is sick.

  6. 6 Beige Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:47 pm

    Wait a minute. “Noah”? A GIRL? Named NOAH?

    Let’s see: Destiny Hope, aka Miley. Another girl, named Noah.

    Doesn’t Pigeon Cootch, Tennessee, have any social services who could have stepped in here?

  7. 7 angry army wife Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:54 pm

    What? Holy crap. I have nothing. Damn, these kids are growing up way too fast.

  8. 8 CMS2004 Feb 4th, 2010 at 10:18 pm

    And then if (God forbid) little Noah turns up “in the family way” a la Jamie Lynn Spears, it’s going to be “OMG BABIES HAVING BABIES!!!111!” Well, no shit, Sherlock. When you’ve got 9-year-olds designing LINGERIE, they’re gonna start bumping uglies a little early. Hot damn, I’m 31 and I don’t even wear lingerie. I’m a t-shirt kind of girl, much to my husband’s dismay.

    And, yes, Beige — she’s a girl. Named Noah. I don’t get it either. I think Billy Ray made one too many trips to the bathtub still for some moonshine.

  9. 9 AllyKat Feb 5th, 2010 at 12:04 am

    Who in their right mind thinks a nine year old is qualified to design underwear??? I don’t even know where to start with this. Apoplectic spluttering is all that my brain can produce. My mom would beat me now if I took photos like that with a pole, and I’m 28.

    Also: why do people give girls boy names and boys girl names? Are they trying to give their kids a complex?

  10. 10 KittyChymira Feb 5th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    Seriously? My little sister is 16, and I would choke her if I caught her wearing half the stuff this little 9 year old is wearing. Did anyone follow the link? Anyone? Did you SEE what she was wearing? Her skirts looked like the belong on someone working a pole. Man, at 9 I was out playing in dirt and drawing with chalk. I didn’t start shaving my legs till I was 12 or 13. This little one is probably getting waxed and having her eyebrows done. Eeesh. Let her be a damn kid.

    Also, no child should be wearing makeup, much less THAT MUCH makeup.

  11. 11 skippy Feb 5th, 2010 at 3:21 am

    This is really sad. Why are her stupid parents allowing this? Girls are being sexualized so young these days, and it’s tragic.

  12. 12 All Women Stalker Feb 5th, 2010 at 6:41 am

    Good gawd. What are the Cyrus parents thinking? What parenting book have they been reading?! This is just sick. And kids are indeed growing up too fast. O.o

  13. 13 Jenn Feb 5th, 2010 at 10:29 am

    The Cyrus parents are laughing all the way to the bank. They know idiot parents are going to buy this dreck.

  14. 14 This is just further proof... Feb 5th, 2010 at 10:36 am

    The End Is Near!

  15. 15 JonnyComeLately Feb 5th, 2010 at 11:15 am

    Epic Fail… While I would not let my 12 yr old daughter wear those trampy clothes pictured, it appears that this linguini thing is a hoax… Totally believable with this family of attention seekers, but fundamentally untrue…

  16. 16 cara Feb 5th, 2010 at 11:28 am

    They were talking about this on Wendy Williams the other day and the question was arised as to “what should parents do?” Now I have three heathens of my own and in that two girls in the tweens and teens. And you know what, I will say “no” if I don’t approve of what they are wearing and if that doesn’t work, I will “karate chop them in the neck!” (they make fun of me and say I remind them of Miss Piggy, but I say, thinner and hotter LOL) Seriously, thank God my state allows coporal punishment. What has happened to the way we raise children? I swift kick in the ass is sometimes all they need. I mean is it that hard to differenciate between giving your kid the beat down they may have coming and ending up on dreamindemon.

    The Noah for her name though, I actually like. I’ve known girls named Owen, Reagan, Ascher, etc. It’s actually much better then Destiny Hope *gag*.

  17. 17 Shell Feb 5th, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    Isn’t this just a rumour?

  18. 18 TheRose Feb 5th, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    Did anyone actually do any real research on this? What that so-called little girl (I think she might actually be a 27 year old Little Person ’cause no child dresses like that) is wearing is not what the collection is.

    http://www.disneydreaming.com/2010/01/26/emily-grace-reaves-ooh-la-la-couture-collection/

    The above link is the collection. It’s not lingerie it’s costume tutus just like little girls have been wearing forever.

  19. 19 Shell Feb 5th, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    Also:

    http://dlisted.com/node/35912

    I’m no fan of the Cyrus’s but I think you should correct this post.

  20. 20 chrocs Feb 5th, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    Why are the stars in the tutus inverted? Wasn’t that supposed to be evil? Next collection will include a cute Slayer logo in pink blood letters.

  21. 21 StrawberryGirl Feb 5th, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    I took a look at the dresses on that link and frankly, they look like something you’d buy for your kid if she was going to attend an Irish Traveller wedding.

  1. 1 Correction! It Isn’t Creepy. Or Weird. at Deceiver.com Pingback on Feb 5th, 2010 at 8:55 pm

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!




February 2010
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • fallingstar: http://shine.yahoo.com/chan...
    • Stan: Reminds me of Slim Fast. One can fills you up if...
    • Pearce: You rock, Aleric.
    • Mfrag: Yeah that commercial bothered me for the same...
    • Pearce: I hate to be the one slightly dissenting voice...
    • Aleric: So because my GF is 5′2″ and weighs...
    • StrawberryGirl: She should lose the weight BEFORE pimping...
    • StrawberryGirl: It’s easy to love yourself when...
    • Catharine: Ooooh Fallingstar where did you find the...
    • StrawberryGirl: What an arrogant see-you-next-Tuesday....
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • "When it comes to rounding up John Edwards news and links, I can’t hope to compete with Deceiver."Mickey Kaus, Slate

    • "Thank you for your awesome posts. Deceiver is by far the best new blog I discovered this year."Yeeeah!

    • "I love you. This site is like Dlisted if MK read newspapers."  – reader Nanners

    • "Thank you for having the balls to cut through the spin and hype" – reader Kim Hee

    • "OH … MY … GOD … Can I come and work for you people?" – reader Spengman

    • "There must be some hardcore vegans running this site" – reader David

    • "It is nice to get intellectual about something that really has no bearing on anyone’s life"Normality Restored

    • "Another blog filled with the angry ramblings of the jealous and envious" – reader wfc123 at Metafilter

    • "Interesting that most of the hypocrisy comes from popular and attractive women" – reader Joey at Metafilter

    • "Our new guilty pleasure blog"BigHeadDC

    • "Love your site btw, i’m so through with all that nasty perez-like gossip based on nothing…" – reader Nathalie

    • "How did I ever live without the keen insights and cutting observations of Deceiver!? And I mean that sincerely... I love your blog. " – reader Teresa

    • "Deceiver.com is our newest obsession" – reader Judi

    • "I don't visit Perez Hilton anymore. I like Deceiver for the solid content, and the lack of spelling errors. Deceiver has a head on their shoulders, whereas Perez Hilton just has head!" – reader Stella