10
Feb
10

PETA’s Superbowl Ad Picks: Do They Know What Real Dogs Look Like?

It’s official: PETA has been holed up for so long working on their robotic replacements for all creatures great and small that they’ve actually forgotten what real animals look like. Or something.

PETA’s blog lists this year’s “Top 5 Superbowl Ads” which “made history with their creative alternatives to live animals”:

  • “Whale of a Tale,” Bridgestone: Three friends. One animatronic whale. Millions of happy viewers. Bridgestone also gets extra kudos from us for recently banning the use of endangered animals in all of its commercials!
  • “Timothy Richman,” Cars.com: The pros of animatronic tiger cub birth: clean, cute, and pain-free. The cons of animatronic tiger cub birth? We can’t think of any.
  • “Finding Beaver,” Monster.com: Leave it to this (CGI) beaver…to play the fiddle? Hoedown, here we come!
  • “Squirrel,” Honda: Why can’t all hoarders be this sleek, adorable, and (faux) furry?
  • “Underdog,” Doritos: We yelled “Holla!” when this taunted dog flipped the tables and put the shock collar on the man. Payback is simply delicious.

Um, I’m not sure if they noticed, but that Doritos dog ain’t animatronic. Yeah, it was a pair of fake doggie paws that put the shock collar on that mean, Doritos eating dude (I can see why PETA got off on that one), but still. Real dog. REEEEAAL DOG.

So, what PETA is trying to tell us is that it’s OK to use live animals if they’re engaged in torturing humans — or if we use them to create fake, CGI animals, but otherwise it’s just not cool?

Whew. Glad they cleared that up. I was starting to get really confused.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:


4 Responses to “PETA’s Superbowl Ad Picks: Do They Know What Real Dogs Look Like?”


  1. 1 Mindy Feb 10th, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    What a joke!

  2. 2 angry army wife Feb 10th, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    When we first saw this commerical, it was a big outburst of “wait till PETA gets ahold of this commercial”. What a crock of horse crap. Why is PETA still in existance?

  3. 3 Beige Feb 10th, 2010 at 8:46 pm

    Why is PETA still in existance?

    …Because we get such a kick out of watching them flail in teh failz?

  4. 4 LoopTheLup Feb 11th, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    The cons of animatronic tiger cub birth? Newborn tiger cubs (heck, newborn cubs in general) don’t look like that.

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!



Report a hypocrite* at
tips@deceiver.com



* Famous people only. We don't care about your two-timing ex, nosy neighbor, or belligerent boss.


Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Discordia: Elle, according imdb.com, he’s done hard...
    • Elle: Isn’t Trejo a one-time jailbird himself?
    • Fortunate_Son: Ounce of prevention beats a pound of cure....
    • O Face: I still think that Lohan was one of the few party...
    • Stan: Don’t forget what we discussed. Two inches...
    • Discordia: Trejo’s said that her only fault was...
    • ugh: Don’t teach teenagers about safe sex, and even...
    • California Dave: Rodriguez probably – and rightly...
    • vampirate: Don’t forget Elijah Wood and Seth Green.
    • Ronin: @BB I think part of the point is this is her...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • “I also really appreciate reading the comments left by Deceiver regulars. I rarely comment myself, but I'm a daily reader. Sometimes I feel like this is the only ‘place’ in the world where people make any sense at all.”

      – reader fallingstar
    • “The running list of PETA faux pas is so long, I've had friends tell me they are funded by special interest groups interested in making vegetarians look ridiculous (I'm not kidding). Read Deceiver.com's hilarious dissection of PETA's latest officious blunder.”

      – blogger Mark Sisson
    • “Look, you have a point deceiver… but you do it in the most douchebaggy way possible.”

    • “I just want to say thanks to the writing staff of both the articles and comments here. You guys keep my sides sore and have collective wit that has more bite than a chinese buffet. The humor delivered at the expense of those who deserve it is almost too much to handle at once. This site cannot possibly be real.”

      – reader quigonkick
    • “If you want to get up to speed on the [John Edwards] accusations and see the supporting materials, the best place I've seen everything laid out so far is on the gossipy blog Deceiver.com. I wish it were Talking Points Memo or Raw Story but nope; Deceiver is all over it.”

      – blogger Lee Stranahan