10
Mar
10

D.C. Councilman Blows Smoke Up Law’s Butt

Illinois may think it grows the country’s most corrupt politicians, but Washington, D.C. is giving them a run for their laundered money. The hometown of Marion “Bitch Set Me Up” Barry now has another shining star on the municipal government scene: Councilman Jack Evans.

In 2006, when D.C. banned smoking in bars and restaurants, Evans lent his voice and his vote in support of the measure. “D.C. is one step closer to becoming smoke free,” he published in his weekly newsletter at the time.

Yet on St. Patrick’s Day 2010, he’s trying to give his buddies a chance to smoke cigars at two charity events near and dear to Evans’s wallet heart:

Jack Evans (D-Ward 2) has asked his council colleagues to keep tradition alive for the all-male Society of the Friendly Sons of St. Patrick and another organization, Fight for Children, which hosts an annual smoke-filled professional boxing fundraiser.

Evans, who is a member of the Irish organization, said the measure was narrowly crafted, making an exception for only two nights a year and protecting workers by allowing venue employees to opt out of working the events.

But the rules are the rules, entirely because people like Evans voted to make them law. How do you like them apples?

H/T: Jacob Grier

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

Related posts:


12 Responses to “D.C. Councilman Blows Smoke Up Law’s Butt”


  1. 1 Fortunate_Son Mar 10th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    Brief sidebar:

    John Edwards henchman Andrew Young (and wife) jailed for 75 days for contempt.

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/edwards_andrew_young_ordered_jailed_sex_tape_hunter/celebrity/68295

  2. 2 Aleric Mar 10th, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    Remember the Democrats credo, “Do as I say, not as I do” or “The rules only apply to the little people”.

  3. 3 Stan Mar 10th, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    Never trust a man with no jaw line.

  4. 4 LN Mar 10th, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    Or shifty eyes

  5. 5 bigmama Mar 10th, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    Still doesn’t beat Blago and Ryan. Nice try though.

  6. 6 Pastafarian Mar 10th, 2010 at 6:00 pm
  7. 7 Mermaid Mar 10th, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    never trust a politician. period. (can’t help noticing his right eye has a mind of its own)

  8. 8 LN Mar 10th, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    Wow Pasta, you were right. And boy does he look better with the green hue

  9. 9 Pastafarian Mar 10th, 2010 at 6:55 pm
  10. 10 AllyKat Mar 11th, 2010 at 1:06 am

    DUIs supposedly increased in the counties closest to DC after the law was passed – people fled to the smoky bars of the suburbs, but then had to drive home. Law of unintended consequences. The premise behind such laws is stupid, it isn’t really about “protecting” the workers or other patrons. It’s about telling people what to do and trying to lower smoking rates. I don’t smoke, but I know that a lot of people who go out to eat and go to bars like to smoke while there. If I want to work in a smoke-free establishment, I’ll apply at an office or clothing store. If you don’t want exposed to secondhand smoke, don’t apply for a job at a place where people smoke! People have a choice: patronize and work at places where smoking is allowed, or do so at places where smoking isn’t allowed. No one is forced to work in these spots. No one is forced to patronize places where smoking is allowed. If a bar or restaurant thinks that their business will be best if they allow smoking, that shouldn’t be a problem. Smoking is legal, and until it isn’t, private localities have a right to allow or disallow it on their property.

    I am actually fairly anti-smoking (it’s a stupid, deadly habit), but I don’t think private, non-essential businesses should be forbidden to allow patrons to chose to ingest nasty but legal drugs. If I don’t want to be around it, I don’t have to be. If it is okay to smoke outside on public ground, how can it be wrong to do it inside on private ground, regardless of the owner’s/tenant’s wishes?

  11. 11 angry army wife Mar 11th, 2010 at 5:29 pm

    That man looks just plain creepy in the photo above. Like Bill Clinton creepy.

  12. 12 Anonymous Mar 12th, 2010 at 1:47 am

    lol@Pasta’s pics…Doesn’t he look like Jiminy Cricket a bit as well?

    http://users.cwnet.com/xephyr/rich/dzone/hoozoo/images/jiminy2.gif

Opinions expressed in these comments are those of the commenters, and probably don't represent the views of your humble Deceiver bloggers. If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient. We "moderate" comments to sift out spam, obscenities, and harassment.

All (civil) opinions are welcome. And if you can't be civil, at least be entertaining!



Report a hypocrite* at
tips@deceiver.com



* Famous people only. We don't care about your two-timing ex, nosy neighbor, or belligerent boss.


Deceiver Atom Feed
Bookmark and Share
About Deceiver
CafePress
  • Recent Comments

    • Discordia: Elle, according imdb.com, he’s done hard...
    • Elle: Isn’t Trejo a one-time jailbird himself?
    • Fortunate_Son: Ounce of prevention beats a pound of cure....
    • O Face: I still think that Lohan was one of the few party...
    • Stan: Don’t forget what we discussed. Two inches...
    • Discordia: Trejo’s said that her only fault was...
    • ugh: Don’t teach teenagers about safe sex, and even...
    • California Dave: Rodriguez probably – and rightly...
    • vampirate: Don’t forget Elijah Wood and Seth Green.
    • Ronin: @BB I think part of the point is this is her...
  • people like you crave deceiver

    • “I also really appreciate reading the comments left by Deceiver regulars. I rarely comment myself, but I'm a daily reader. Sometimes I feel like this is the only ‘place’ in the world where people make any sense at all.”

      – reader fallingstar
    • “The running list of PETA faux pas is so long, I've had friends tell me they are funded by special interest groups interested in making vegetarians look ridiculous (I'm not kidding). Read Deceiver.com's hilarious dissection of PETA's latest officious blunder.”

      – blogger Mark Sisson
    • “Look, you have a point deceiver… but you do it in the most douchebaggy way possible.”

    • “I just want to say thanks to the writing staff of both the articles and comments here. You guys keep my sides sore and have collective wit that has more bite than a chinese buffet. The humor delivered at the expense of those who deserve it is almost too much to handle at once. This site cannot possibly be real.”

      – reader quigonkick
    • “If you want to get up to speed on the [John Edwards] accusations and see the supporting materials, the best place I've seen everything laid out so far is on the gossipy blog Deceiver.com. I wish it were Talking Points Memo or Raw Story but nope; Deceiver is all over it.”

      – blogger Lee Stranahan